Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Blockworks

@blockworks_news

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,961subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001707271216
TypeChannel
Username@blockworks_news
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blockworks_news

Growth

3,9614,0143,987.57 August 2026 — 4,014 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,011 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,009 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,961 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,953–4,022 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:473,961-48
11 Aug 2026, 05:014,009-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:324,011-3
7 Aug 2026, 04:454,014first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣550.0%
220.0%
220.0%
🏆110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC≈2,290 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

USDT is the means of exchange for roughly 80% of Venezuela's oil sales, one economist estimates https://blockworks.co/news/venezuelas-sanctions-stablecoins

🤣321

6 Jan 2026, 17:53 UTC≈2,100 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

After a lull in late 2025, Strategy is back to buying BTC — but its accumulation may be more episodic going forward https://blockworks.co/news/strategy-playbook-2026

🤣2

6 Jan 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ranger’s ICO begins today and will run through Jan. 10; it's selling 39% of the total RNGR supply https://blockworks.co/news/rangers-ico-metadao

5 Jan 2026, 15:16 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 8 August 2026

ETH leverage is stabilizing, while the next retail-leverage wave could form in equity perps https://blockworks.co/news/eth-derivatives-reset

2 Jan 2026, 23:44 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 8 August 2026

Alright, alright, alright: Good news rarely makes headlines, and 2025 was a better year than it seemed https://blockworks.co/news/friday-charts-finding-good-news-in-spite-of-bad-headlines

2 Jan 2026, 16:56 UTC828 viewsread 8 August 2026

In a choppy week for crypto, DePIN and Gaming sectors had gains of 13.1% and 12.6%, while L2s lagged https://blockworks.co/news/depin-gaming-surprising-rebound

1 Jan 2026, 18:23 UTC709 viewsread 8 August 2026

DTCC is tokenizing a subset of DTC-custodied U.S. Treasuries on Canton, a network that says it supports $6T+ in onchain RWAs https://blockworks.co/news/cantons-rwa-rails/

1 Jan 2026, 16:45 UTC636 viewsread 8 August 2026

Will crypto have a watershed attention moment in 2026? https://blockworks.co/news/cryptos-coffee-pot-moment

1 Jan 2026, 00:24 UTC560 viewsread 8 August 2026

Happy New Year from the Breakdown, and from all of us on the Blockworks telegram!! Sharing a champagne emoji with you all! 🍾🍾🪩🪩🎉🎉

1 Jan 2026, 00:22 UTC559 viewsread 8 August 2026

In crypto (and most of life), it's not failure that defines us — it's our resilience. https://blockworks.co/news/failure-is-an-option/

31 Dec 2025, 19:23 UTC558 viewsread 8 August 2026

BTC yield without impermanent loss is no longer theoretical: Yield Basis uses leverage to eliminate IL and distributes real protocol earnings to LPs https://blockworks.co/news/yield-basis-native-btc-yield

31 Dec 2025, 17:17 UTC506 viewsread 8 August 2026

The idea that companies should be run for the benefit of shareholders is relatively new — and it may conflict with industry growth and innovation https://blockworks.co/news/users-are-the-best-investors-to-have/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blockworks_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,165,614 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Coin Bureau
@CoinBureau · 119,214
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
unfolded.
@unfolded · 118,897
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Wu Blockchain News
@wublockchainenglish · 253,066
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blockworks” (@blockworks_news), 3,961 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockworks_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.