Channel
@CryptoPotato
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,154subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001173752748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoPotato |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoPotato |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 6,154 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 6,150 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 6,151 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 6,150 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:09 | 6,150 | first reading |
97 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 97 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 97 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,426 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ZachXBT Names Tiffany Milanovich in Alleged Wallet and Coinbase Theft Network • ZachXBT identified Tiffany Milanovich as a US-based scammer linked to over $5 million in thefts through impersonation scams involving hardware wallets and exchanges. • Milanovich allegedly drained funds from victims by posing as support staff, recorded herself taunting them, and showcased her luxury purchases and gambling with stolen mon…
SEC Plans Vote on New Crypto Investment Contract Rules as CLARITY Act Stalls • The SEC will hold an open meeting on August 14 to consider proposing new rules for a tailored offering path for certain crypto investment contracts, independent of the stalled CLARITY Act. • A formal proposal from the SEC would require a lengthy process, including public comments and revisions, which typically takes 12 to 18 months to fin…
Internet Computer (ICP) Rebounds 10% Weekly: What’s Happening and What’s Next? • Leading cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum saw volatility but posted minor gains, while Internet Computer (ICP) outperformed top assets with a 10% weekly increase. • ICP's price peaked at nearly $2.40, driven by nearing the milestone of 300 billion processed transactions, significantly surpassing Solana's total. • Despite recent…
Ethereum Price Analysis: Is ETH’s $2K Dream Dead After the Latest Rejection? • Ethereum is consolidating around $1.8K after recovering from June lows, but remains under pressure with key resistance at $1.9K and $2.1K. • The 4-hour chart shows ETH in a broad ascending channel, needing to hold above $1.83K to maintain a bullish structure, while a drop below could lead to support around $1.71K-$1.75K. • The exchange su…
Ripple (XRP) Just Dipped Below $1: Collapse Warning or Hidden Opportunity? • Ripple's XRP token has dropped over 7% in the past week, falling below the $1.00 mark, leading to divided opinions among analysts regarding its future. • Some analysts predict further declines, with potential drops to $0.86, while others see recent whale activity and technical indicators as signs of a possible rebound. • Accumulation of ove…
Bitcoin Knots Plans New Proof-of-Work Algorithm After BIP-110 Enforcement Fails • Bitcoin Knots announced plans to select a new proof-of-work algorithm for the stalled BIP-110 chain after it produced only two blocks, warning users against switching to software that undermines consensus rules. • The BIP-110 fork, which has only 2.5% support, has faced significant block production issues, while the main Bitcoin networ…
ADA’s Rally Hits a Wall: Analyst Warns a 25% Drop Could Be Next • Cardano's price increased by 15% in August but has retraced to $0.187, with concerns of a potential decline due to reduced whale activity and technical indicators. • Analyst Ali Martinez warns of a possible drop to $0.17, citing a death cross formation and a sell signal on the daily chart. • Despite bearish signals, ADA's exchange outflows are higher …
Bitcoin Miner Riot Stock Jumps 24% After $9.1B Anthropic AI Deal • Anthropic has signed a 20-year agreement with Riot Platforms to pay $9.1 billion for computing capacity at Riot's Texas campus, significantly boosting Riot's stock by 24% in after-hours trading. • Riot will provide 191 megawatts of capacity, enough to power approximately 143,000 homes, although neither company has publicly confirmed the deal's detail…
Important Ripple News and XRP Price Update: August 11 • XRP is facing significant selling pressure, nearing a drop below $1.00 for the first time in nearly two years, while BTC remains stable around $64,000. • The XRP Ledger reported a 400% increase in tokenized real-world assets, reaching $4.4 billion, but also warned of phishing scams targeting the community. • Ripple has made regulatory progress, securing a MiCA …
XRP Dumps to 21-Month Low as BTC Price Falls to $64K: Market Watch • Bitcoin's price fell from above $65,000 to under $64,000, with significant drops in larger-cap altcoins like Ethereum and XRP. • Ethereum is struggling below $1,900, while XRP is near a 21-month low, just above $1.00. • The overall cryptocurrency market cap has decreased by approximately $40 billion, now standing at $2.250 trillion. https://crypto…
Pi Network’s PI Crashes Below Key Support as Pioneers Await Major Update Today • Pi Network's native token, PI, has dropped below the key support level of $0.09 after a brief recovery, currently trading around $0.086. • The community is anticipating the second-to-last protocol upgrade (version 26), which must be completed by August 11 to avoid disconnection from the network. • The project's market cap has fallen bel…
Only 90 Bitcoin Wallets Hold 10K+ BTC: And That Number Just Hit a 6-Month High • Bitcoin's price fell below $64,000 after failing to maintain a push above $65,000, with a 1.6% decline over the past day. • The number of elite wallets holding at least 10,000 BTC has increased to a six-month high, while smaller holders are losing ground, indicating a shift towards stronger hands. • Institutional interest in Bitcoin ETF…
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @CryptoPotato. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 343,508 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoPotato News (Official)” (@CryptoPotato), 6,154 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoPotato.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.