Binance’s Spot Market Share Drops to 42% After $6.3B Hack as OKX Gains • Binance's spot trading share dropped to 42%, its lowest in 12 weeks, following a $6.3 billion hack, while OKX and Coinbase increased their shares to 14% and 9.6%, respectively. • After the hack attributed to North Korea's TraderTraitor group, Binance experienced net outflows of $5.6 billion, with assets decreasing from $171 billion to $157 bill…

Channel
CryptoPotato News (Official)
@CryptoPotato
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,980subscribers
-170 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001173752748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoPotato |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoPotato |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 02:57 | 5,980 | -2 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:51 | 5,982 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:46 | 5,996 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 6,000 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:58 | 6,009 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 6,022 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:46 | 6,037 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 6,042 | -7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 6,049 | -6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 6,055 | -9 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 6,064 | -14 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 6,078 | -6 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 6,084 | -8 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 6,092 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 6,093 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 6,102 | +7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 6,095 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:13 | 6,087 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 6,097 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 6,099 | first reading |
Engagement
132 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.14%
- avg views ÷ 5,980 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 128
- 35 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.963%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 35
- of 132 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 132 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,469 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 02:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 87.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Morgan Stanley Tokenizes US Stocks and Treasuries Through DTCC’s New Service • Morgan Stanley has tokenized US stocks and Treasuries using the DTCC Tokenization Service, which launched on October 28. • The service allows for the creation of tokens backed one-to-one by securities, maintaining the same legal rights and protections as the underlying assets. • Trading of tokenized stocks is now expected to begin in the …
Crypto PACs Lose Key Races After Spending Millions in Midterms • Crypto-focused super PACs spent over $176 million in the 2026 US midterms, but faced significant losses, including a $64 million effort to defeat Democrat Sherrod Brown in Ohio. • Despite Brown's previous criticisms of the crypto sector, he softened his stance during the campaign, ultimately winning with 49.7% of the vote against Republican Jon Husted'…
CFTC Opens Equity Perps Trading and Gets Sued Hours Later • The CFTC has approved the trading of perpetual futures on individual US stocks, classified as security futures products under federal laws, allowing US traders access to popular overseas products. • A lawsuit has been filed by the Capital Markets Alliance, backed by Cboe and Citadel Securities, claiming the CFTC exceeded its authority and encroached on the …
Top Zcash Price Predictions as ZEC Surges 14% Daily • Zcash (ZEC) has surged over 14% in the past 24 hours, surpassing $1,300, driven by bullish sentiment and expectations of a new all-time high. • The upcoming NU7 upgrade, set for November 5, aims to reduce block time significantly, which analysts believe could lead to further price increases. • Despite the recent gains, there are concerns about a potential pullbac…
$380M in Shorts Liqudated in an Hour as Bitcoin (BTC) Skyrockets to $81K • Bitcoin surged to $81,000 after dropping to a seven-week low of $75,600 following the US midterm elections, with altcoins like ETH and XRP also experiencing significant gains. • Over $910 million in both long and short positions were liquidated in the past 24 hours, with $380 million in shorts liquidated in just one hour. • The market's rapid…
Official Trump (TRUMP) Drops to a 3-Month Low Following the Democrats’ Victory: Details • The Democratic Party achieved a significant victory in the midterm elections, gaining control of both the Senate and House, even in traditionally Republican states like Texas. • The election results led to increased volatility in crypto markets, with many digital assets initially dropping before recovering, while meme coins ass…
ZachXBT Names French Banking Giant in Alleged $133M Crypto Heist • ZachXBT has identified Crédit Mutuel Arkéa as the alleged EU financial institution involved in a crypto theft exceeding $133 million, following suspicious withdrawals from centralized exchanges. • The investigation revealed that stolen funds were withdrawn in USDC and USDT, then laundered through various transactions, with the actual amount potential…
The Next Altcoin Rally May Be Closer Than You Think: Analyst Points to Key Signals • The cryptocurrency market experienced volatility following the $6.3 billion Binance hack and the US midterm elections, but many altcoins have begun a V-shaped recovery. • Analyst Ali Martinez identified Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and Cardano (ADA) as potential short-term rally candidates, with buy signals indicating possible rebo…
ZEC Explodes by 13% Daily as BTC Price Reclaims $78K After Midterm Elections: Market Watch • Bitcoin's price dropped to a seven-week low of $75,600 post-US midterm elections but rebounded to around $78,500, with a market cap of $1.570 trillion. • The largest hack in crypto history, involving $6.3 billion from Binance, contributed to significant volatility in Bitcoin's price, which fell to $76,100 before recovering s…
After Historic Binance Hack, South Korea Considers 99% Cold Wallet Rule for Crypto Exchanges • The recent Binance security breach, resulting in over $6.3 billion stolen, has led South Korean regulators to consider increasing the cold storage requirement for exchanges from 80% to potentially 99%. • The proposed change could pose challenges for smaller exchanges, as higher cold storage levels may delay customer withdr…
Bitcoin Whipsaws After Democratic Sweep: BTC Reclaims $78K • Bitcoin dropped to a 7-week low of $75,600 following the US midterm elections, reacting negatively to the Democratic control of Congress. • The cryptocurrency quickly rebounded to over $78,000 as political uncertainty eased and buyers returned to the market. • Analysts suggest that Bitcoin's recent price action may indicate a local bottom, with support aro…
Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @CryptoPotato. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@coingape · 22,669
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@www_Bitcoin_com · 51,336
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@CryptopolitanOfficial · 23,947
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@officialcryptodaily · 30,162
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
@the_block_crypto · 24,288
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
@analyticsinsightmag · 33,501
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@bloombergcrypto · 24,117
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
@CryptoWorldNews · 40,842
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@CryptoProUpdates · 34,183
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
@cryptoquant_official · 55,478
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@cmcal_bot · 29,755
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoPotato News (Official)” (@CryptoPotato), 5,980 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoPotato.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.