Channel
@byeva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,833subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001134972615 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @byeva |
| Description | меня зовут Ева Саид , и я fashion-консультант и инфлюенсер! Мой канал про личные находки из мира моды, lifestyle и просто повседневную жизнь. сотрудничество — byevablog@gmail.com Канал включен РКН в перечень персональных страниц: https://c |
| Created | 11 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/byeva |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 26,833 | +21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 26,812 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 26,798 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 26,795 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 26,805 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 26,808 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 26,818 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 26,812 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (4 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 97,360 |
| Reactions total | 1,266 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,266 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,080 | 85.3% | |
| 🔥 | 63 | 4.98% | |
| custom 5237960153617145567 | 55 | 4.34% | |
| 💔 | 34 | 2.69% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 1.66% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 0.79% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.237% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,266reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
очень хочу поехать осенью в Казахстан 🇰🇿 ищу консьерж-агента, который сможет организовать путешествие полностью от точки А до точки В 🫰🏻 в планах: тур по главным местам Мангистау + Алматы и восточная часть Казахстана. хайкинг, палатки, озёра, поля, горы, конные прогулки — хочется увидеть максимум красоты страны! если у вас есть проверенные контакты, поделитесь, пожалуйста 🤍
❤75
сегодня был совершен шоппинг набег в agentprovocateur в цуме на 4 этаже… куплена пижама, купальник и еле сдержала себя от покупки этих каблуков… почему никто не говорил, какие они удобные?
❤83
девочки.. те самые водолазки с подплечниками во всех оттенках были замечены только что на sale! do not walk —>> run на сайте стартовал pre-season sale, на котором также были замечены пуховики по очень приятной цене и неубиваемые костюмы из кашемира, мой серый, что только не прошел — как новый
❤37
если вы меня спросите мой любимый образ за прошлую неделю — вот он! джинсы nikonorova футболка rockabi туфли amina muaddi
❤115🔥27
кейп от питерских bclb! невестам на заметку
❤95💔34custom 52379601536171455677🔥4
я дико извиняюсь, но почему я только сейчас узнала про это отечественный бренд с чехлами kkspace? ночному шоппингу быть!! а кто-то покупал уже?
❤106🔥13
пока не совсем определилась, какой оттенок мне нравится больше: розовый или черный но определено влюбилась в это платье
❤60custom 523796015361714556714
дико извиняюсь, но сегодня хотелка дня — Алиса с планшетом пару дней назад за ужином все начали рассказывать у кого какая алиса, и тут я узнала о той, которая с планшетом.., и мысли о ней более не покидают меня
❤70
как там говорят? у уважающей себя девушки всегда должно быть припрятано платье на внезапное вечерние мероприятие!? и вот повод найти то самое платье
❤64
уже моя вторая стрижка у Евгения Меньшаева в KL! прошу плотный срез по спинке, с мягким каскадом у лица, нравится, что после стрижки Евгения волос легко поддается укладке
❤78🥰10💯9
случай из жизни: прихожу как ни в чем не бывало на тренировку по теннису, и первое, что слышу от тренера: вот ты выставила этот visbody, а мы же утром на следующий день были там же с подругой на осмотре… восторг тренера был неописуем, как и мой после сканера: узнала про зажимы в мышцах, про соотношение мышечной массы и жира, не говоря уже про то, что из 61кг массы моего тела —> 29кг это мышцы! приятно делала скан в…
❤50💯12
в интересном высветилась одна из самых красивых невест, которых я видела за последнее время! образ 10 из 10!
❤153custom 523796015361714556732
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @byeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 10,858 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BYEVA 🧚🏻♂️” (@byeva), 26,833 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/byeva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.