Війни, технології, епідемії, дипломатія, геополітика — все, що навколо нас.
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@3svitova/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/3svitova?igsh=MTl4
📲Зв'язок: @ThirdSvitova_bot
Created
10 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 366 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +2,590. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,782–22,268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 17:41
21,774
-11
8 Nov 2026, 08:09
21,785
+33
7 Nov 2026, 00:05
21,752
+28
6 Nov 2026, 03:07
21,724
+28
4 Nov 2026, 23:41
21,696
-103
4 Nov 2026, 02:58
21,799
+10
3 Nov 2026, 02:01
21,789
+87
2 Nov 2026, 02:48
21,702
-6
1 Nov 2026, 02:55
21,708
+15
31 Oct 2026, 01:57
21,693
-15
29 Oct 2026, 23:36
21,708
-25
29 Oct 2026, 02:19
21,733
-13
27 Oct 2026, 21:09
21,746
-7
26 Oct 2026, 20:58
21,753
+24
25 Oct 2026, 21:20
21,729
+1
24 Oct 2026, 21:16
21,728
-3
24 Oct 2026, 00:01
21,731
-9
22 Oct 2026, 22:11
21,740
-10
21 Oct 2026, 18:30
21,750
+4
20 Oct 2026, 11:38
21,746
first reading
Engagement
410 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.7%
avg views ÷ 21,774 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,210
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.764%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 410 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
410 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
542,168
Reactions total
4,144
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,200
Videos
≈4,460
Links
≈10,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 56m
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 117 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,118 reactions across 399 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
6,978
27.8%
❤
5,082
20.2%
🤬
3,947
15.7%
👍
2,712
10.8%
🤔
1,148
4.57%
🫡
1,144
4.55%
🤡
966
3.85%
💯
771
3.07%
😢
583
2.32%
😁
563
2.24%
🤯
323
1.29%
🥰
275
1.09%
🤣
223
0.888%
💊
114
0.454%
🤝
87
0.346%
💔
60
0.239%
🗿
36
0.143%
😈
31
0.123%
👎
27
0.107%
🙉
16
0.064%
4 further kinds
32
0.127%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 410 of the 410 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,911 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 410 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 410 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @third_svitova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 410 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 66 posts held from the last 30 days (25.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Якби Покровськ просто пропустив крізь себе росіян, Добропілля вже не було б, — командир 7-го корпусу ДШВ Євген Ласійчук в інтерв'ю «Українській правді».
Головне з великої розмови про оборону Покровська, ситуацію на Запоріжжі та тактику росіян:
▪️ Росія готує транспортний локдаун Запоріжжя. За словами Ласійчука, окупанти вже атакують мости, дамби та енергетичну інфраструктуру. На Гуляйпільському напрямку зосереджено…
🇩🇰🇺🇦 Данія надасть Україні новий оборонний пакет на €645 млн, — Зеленський.
Кошти спрямують на ударні дрони та перехоплювачі, боєприпаси для F-16 і програму PURL.
Окремо Данія виділить €20 млн на енергетичну підтримку Херсонщини.
Третя світова🪫
🔴 Запрошуємо до перегляду нового випуску
Стали відомі переможці наймасштабніших дронових змагань України «Дикі дрони».
Також озвучили дуже солідні призи для найкращих команд і операторів БпЛА.
Головний сержант БпС Black Raven 93-ї ОМБр «Холодний Яр», співорганізатор «Диких дронів» Денис «Сідий» Кардаш розповів для «Третьої світової» про новий рівень змагань, про унікальну «банду» дронярів і які зараз FPV найпопуля…
🇸🇦🇾🇪 Саудівська коаліція заявила про знищення трьох об'єктів із виробництва балістичних ракет хуситів у Ємені
Під удар потрапили підприємство зі складання ракет, завод із виробництва твердого ракетного палива та лабораторія ракетної електроніки.
За заявою коаліції, операцію провели у відповідь на ракетні та дронові атаки хуситів по цивільних об'єктах.
Третя світова🪫
🇺🇦 Генштаб підтвердив удар по 123-му авіаремонтному заводу в Старій Руссі Новгородської області рф, де ремонтують літаки А-50
У ніч на 10 листопада на території підприємства пролунали вибухи та виникла пожежа. Масштаби пошкоджень уточнюються.
У березні 2026 року на цьому заводі вже було пошкоджено літак А-50.
Третя світова🪫
Сили оборони уразили російський підрозділ «Рубікон» поблизу окупованого Бердянська, за 107 км від лінії фронту, — УВ «Південь».
Операцію спільно провели Harpy Group, Служба зовнішньої розвідки, ЦСО «А» СБУ та 412-й окремий полк безпілотних систем.
Третя світова🪫
В Архангельській області рф обвалився залізничний міст, кілька вагонів вантажного потяга зійшли з рейок
Інцидент стався сьогодні о 05:10 на перегоні Черемуха–Віледь. Рух ділянкою Печорської залізничної магістралі повністю перекрито.
Попередньо не виключають диверсію, однак офіційного підтвердження немає.
Третя світова🪫
🇺🇦🇺🇸🇷🇺 Перейшли до тристороннього формату переговорів Україна-США-Росія. На порядку денному – ключові питання припинення бойових дій та наближення миру, — Умеров.
👍 Підписатись на Фокус
💥 У Новгородській області рф сьогодні вночі, ймовірно, було атаковано 123-й авіаремонтний завод
Підприємство обслуговує військові літаки Іл-76, Іл-78, Л-410 та авіадвигуни.
Місцева влада підтвердила атаку БпЛА та пошкодження промислового об'єкта, не уточнивши його назву.
17 березня завод уже атакували – тоді повідомлялося про ураження ангарів та літака А-50.
Третя світова🪫
Росіяни зараз зазнають більших втрат завдяки сприятливій погоді для роботи українських дронів, — речник Угруповання об’єднаних сил Віктор Трегубов.
За його словами, листя з дерев уже опало, погода залишається ясною, а холод поки не заважає роботі БпЛА. Тому розвідувальні та ударні дрони працюють на повну потужність.
Зараз у нас особливо врожайні місяці,
— зазначив Трегубов, додавши, що поки невідомо, чи збережеться…
🚁 Починаємо серію спеціальних випусків із військово-спортивних змагань «Дикі Дрони»
У першому випуску – «Варшава», оператор FPV 429-ї окремої бригади безпілотних систем «АХІЛЛЕС», яка перемогла в командному заліку змагань.
Ось вам з цікавого – про перехід на більші FPV-дрони з рамами 13-15 дюймів.
За словами військового, зі збільшенням зони ураження зростає потреба в дронах, здатних доставляти боєприпаси на більші…
❤20🫡5🔥3😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 410 posts we hold for @third_svitova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@third_svitova edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
30 September 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @third_svitova as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Соціально-Побутовий Журнал «Водограй» @mag_vodogray · 25,385#1
Український Наступ | #УкрТг ∆ @ukrnastup · 132,921#2
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Соціально-Побутовий Журнал «Водограй» @mag_vodogray · 25,385 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 September 2026
PSDinfo 🇺🇦 @PSDinfo · 53,381 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
Alpha Centauri | Космос @alphacentaurichannel · 34,327 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
Соняшник🦅 @soniah_hub · 42,135 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
WarArchive @WarArchive_ua · 51,487 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Танки. История и современность. Btvt.info @btvt2019 · 24,161 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 September 2026
Ukrainian Special Military @ukrainianspecialmilitary · 18,662 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 29 September 2026
НІП «Тиск» @TyskNIP · 29,482 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Dnipro Osint ⟨ Гарбуз ⟩ @DniproOfficial · 35,633 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
КіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno @kiber_boroshno · 69,760 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Мілітарний @milinua · 74,626 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Повернись живим @savelifeua · 24,400 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
In Factum @in_factum · 45,301 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
OsintFlow ✙ @osintflow · 30,945 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
Дивізіон-«ТІВАЗ» @tivaz_artillery · 41,309 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Пхеньянська Правда🇺🇦 @asian_ukraine · 23,879 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
KARYMAT @karymat · 74,361 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
DroneBomber✙ @dronebomber · 63,827 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Mortis Æterna / Департамент пасивних заходів @mortisaeterna · 19,281 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 September 2026
Легіон Диванної Розвідки 🇺🇦🔱 @couch_iu · 30,930 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
Позивний Каппа @KappaHimera · 51,619 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології @serhii_flash · 171,647 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Третя Сила @The3rdForceUA · 54,082 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Airborne Division @airborne1126 · 27,678 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Третя світова🪫” (@third_svitova), 21,774 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/third_svitova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
