Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Khorne Group

@khornegroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,005subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001987605531
TypeChannel
Username@khornegroup
DescriptionWar on live. Warhammer fans against russian orcs. Maim! Kill! Burn! Announced by Khorne
Created31 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khornegroup

Growth

19,00519,05619,030.56 August 2026 — 19,056 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,055 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,048 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,033 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,028 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,023 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,014 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,005 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,997–19,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:1719,005-9
12 Aug 2026, 00:1219,014-9
11 Aug 2026, 01:3419,023-5
10 Aug 2026, 04:0119,028-5
9 Aug 2026, 03:1119,033-15
8 Aug 2026, 00:4219,048-7
7 Aug 2026, 01:4419,055-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:0219,056first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 19,005 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,390
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held10 (24 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total33,850
Reactions total1,075
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,210
Videos
1,890
Links
511

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 55s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,075 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥68163.3%
14513.5%
😁666.14%
🤔565.21%
👏454.19%
👍302.79%
🤪282.60%
😱121.12%
🍌40.372%
30.279%
🤩20.186%
🥰20.186%
😢10.093%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,075reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @khornegroup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,550 views81 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔥🇷🇺Новоросійськ, вночі. Одна з наймасштабніших атак на місто. NASA зафіксувало пожежі на: ▪️Нафтовий термінал "Шешаріс" ▪️База Військово-морського флоту Росії ▪️Комплекс зерносховищ ▪️Морський транспортний термінал Зеленський: Для атаки на Новоросійськ були використані протикорабельні ракети "Нептун", ударні безпілотники "Паляниця" та "Барс", а також морські дрони.

🔥707👍3😢1

3 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC≈3,570 views128 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Video

🔥Під атакою один з найбільших логістичних центрів 🇷🇺Wildberries у Хрестовому (Владимирская область) Сьогодні, 03.08.2026, логістичний центр Wildberries площею 171 900 м² потрапив під атаку. Цей об’єкт є одним з найбільших логістичних хабів компанії та відіграє ключову роль у розподілі потоків товарів між Московською областю та центральною, північно-західною та північною частинами Європейської Росії. @khornegroup

🔥121👍51🍌1

2 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈3,520 views143 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Логістичний центр Wildberries у Новосемейкіно (Самарська область) площею 178 600 м², один із ключових хабів компанії у Поволжі, повністю зруйнований. @khornegroup

🔥1279👏5👍2

31 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC≈3,090 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @ua_stalkerPhoto

Залітайте на ефір https://t.me/ua_stalker?livestream Запитання ставте у коментарях під цією публікацією. Теми: Перша частина. 1. Як працюють іноземні агенти впливу? Яка їхня інфраструктура, цілі, механізми? Як ефективно їм протидіяти? Друга частина 2. Хто такі сучасні українські праві? Новітня історія руху. Загальне окреслення вектору розвитку й правого сегменту. Головні виклики перед рухом станом на сьогодні.

22🤔6👍5🍌1

30 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC≈3,250 views121 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня ночью Вооруженными Силами Украины в ответ на террористические акты московского режима нанесен массированный удар высокоточным оружием большой дальности воздушного базирования. Ударными беспилотными летательными аппаратами по объектам оборонно-промышленного комплекса в городах: Пенза, Сарапул(Удмуртия), Пермь, Тамань, Керчь. Цели удара достигнуты, все назначенные объекты поражены. Напомним, Вооруженными Сил

🔥95👏166👍3🍌1

29 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC≈3,500 views126 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Осінтер 📱GloOouD задокументував 54 самогубства російських загарбників на фронті протягом 210 днів. (1 самогубство кожні 4 дні) Загальна ж кількість доходить до 500 @khornegroup

66🔥40👏11👍5🥰2😱2

29 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC≈3,640 views107 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Сгенерированное китайцами видео, демонстрирующее футуристический сценарий того, как они, будут вести войну с НАТО В нем показаны: 1. Биомиметические дроны Аппараты в видео созданы по образу и подобию реальных животных и насекомых. Это делается для идеальной маскировки — радары и визуальное наблюдение могут принять их за обычную фауну. -Дроны-птицы: Роботизированная полярная сова, орел и мелкие птицы используются д

😁66🤪26😱103🤩2

29 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈3,150 views107 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ударні дрони завдали масованого удару по Рязанській області Росії; внаслідок атаки горять місцевий НПЗ та склад Wildberries @khornegroup

🔥8616👍4🍌1

26 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC≈4,310 views76 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

DARPA учит дроны видеть физику, а не картинку Военные патенты, спонсируемые DARPA, перестали гнаться за вычислительной мощностью ради самой мощности. Война выигрывается за счет автономности. Главный враг современного умного оружия — проблема SWaP (размер, вес и энергопотребление). Каждый лишний ватт, потраченный на работу нейросети, требует тяжелой батареи, а каждый грамм батареи крадет дальность полета и массу взры

🤔50🔥1273👍2🤪2

24 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC≈4,270 views152 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🔥два склади Wildberries у Санкт-Петербурзі згоріли :) @khornegroup

🔥130👏138👍1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @khornegroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 922,083 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Khorne Group” (@khornegroup), 19,005 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khornegroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.