Біда (ні). Проте можна нарешті порахувати скільки людей в Донецьку по статистичної формулі. Навіть півмільйона не назбирати.
👍4

Channel
@andriyshTime
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
28,117subscribers
+225 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001551993831 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @andriyshTime |
| Description | Канал керівника Центру Вивчення окупації Петра Андрющенка. Прямий зв'язок з автором @andriyshTimeBot Підтримати канал https://send.monobank.ua/jar/6fyrnveXX6 💳Номер картки банки 4441 1111 2425 6425 |
| Created | 20 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/andriyshTime |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 28,117 | +47 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 28,070 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 28,068 | +46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 28,022 | +65 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 27,957 | +17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 27,940 | +15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 27,925 | +17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 27,908 | +16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 27,892 | first reading |
215 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 215 (5 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 619,157 |
| Reactions total | 17,370 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15,786 reactions across 199 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3,587 | 22.7% | |
| 👍 | 2,306 | 14.6% | |
| ❤ | 2,214 | 14.0% | |
| 🤬 | 1,801 | 11.4% | |
| 😁 | 1,595 | 10.1% | |
| 😢 | 841 | 5.33% | |
| 👌 | 723 | 4.58% | |
| 🙏 | 658 | 4.17% | |
| 🤔 | 521 | 3.30% | |
| 💯 | 394 | 2.50% | |
| 🎉 | 330 | 2.09% | |
| 🥴 | 233 | 1.48% | |
| 🤯 | 203 | 1.29% | |
| 👏 | 169 | 1.07% | |
| 😱 | 131 | 0.83% | |
| 😍 | 63 | 0.399% | |
| 🤩 | 15 | 0.095% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.013% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 215 of the 215 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,370reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 215 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Біда (ні). Проте можна нарешті порахувати скільки людей в Донецьку по статистичної формулі. Навіть півмільйона не назбирати.
👍4
🙏Дякую всім за підтримку роботи каналу. Дякую, що читаєте та довіряєте. 🔗Посилання на банку: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/6fyrnveXX6 💳Номер картки банки 4441 1111 2425 6425
👍1
Росіяни почали випускати інфографіку щодо наших ударах по їх території. З урахуванням даних МО РФ звісно. Звісно має бути поправка на «все збили», але виходить, що тепер росіяни звітують про потенційні влучення краще за нас :)
😍15👍9🤔2🤯1
🛵🇺🇦 Горлівка. Наші дрони в небі.
❤39🔥24👍3
Маріуполь - Сімферополь. Сухопутний коридор Смерті. І якщо ви подумали, що там дійсно щось «нормализовалось» - це не так.
🔥68❤7👍2😁2😢1
У липні частка Росії в імпорті сирої нафти Індією досягла рекордних 50,83%, або 2,47 млн барелів на добу. У річному вимірі російські поставки зросли на 62,4%, хоча порівняно з рекордним червнем вони скоротилися на 4,8%. Цікава тут саме причина. На початку року індійські НПЗ намагалися скорочувати закупівлі російської нафти через американський тарифний тиск. Але проблеми з постачанням із Близького Сходу через війну з…
🤬31❤1
Нарешті доведено реальне застосування біологічної зброї НАТО. Чекаю на українське коріння … 😂😂😂
😁63🔥6❤2🥴2
🤯 Мінкульт бронюватиме учасників "Тисячовесни": програми фінансування мистецьких проєктів під егідою Зеленського, на який з бюджету йде 4 млрд грн Тепер підприємства, установи чи організації, які безпосередньо задіяні у створенні проєктів у межах президентської ініціативи «Тисячовесна» (за договорами вартістю від 100 тисяч гривень), отримують офіційне право на визнання своєї критичності та, відповідно, на подальше …
🤬49🤔2😁2
На тлі великої кількості подій масштаб атаки на Новоросійськ міг залишитися недооціненим. Давайте розберемося чому йдеться про складну комбіновану операцію Сил оборони України із застосуванням повітряних і морських безпілотників та ракетного озброєння. За даними Генштабу, в ніч проти 12 серпня в Новоросійську були уражені одразу чотири російські військові кораблі: фрегати «Адмірал Макаров» і «Адмірал Ессен», малий р…
❤40🔥16👍4👌2
Україна тестує власні реактивні дрони для знешкодження реактивних Shahed За словами Михайла Федорова, в Україні стартували бойові випробування перших вітчизняних дронів-перехоплювачів. Розробка покликана ефективно протидіяти оновленим реактивним версіям ворожих безпілотників. Проєкт реалізувало одне з українських підприємств завдяки грантовій підтримці оборонного кластера Brave1. Завдяки реактивному двигуну новий дро…
👍49❤15🙏6👏3😢1
⚠️Росія продовжує нормалізувати військову службу як місцевий ринок праці. У Запорізькій області триває набір до «БАРС-Запоріжжя»: заявлена зарплата 210-350 тис. рублів на місяць плюс регіональна виплата 50 тис. рублів. При цьому роботодавці в Якимівському окрузі того самого дня публічно називають однією з основних економічних проблем дефіцит кваліфікованих кадрів.
🤬27❤2👌1
🇵🇱🇱🇹 Польща та Литва забезпечили понад половину імпорту бензину в Україну У липні Україна імпортувала близько 196 тис. тонн бензину. Одразу 107,8 тис. тонн, або близько 55%, надійшло лише з двох напрямків: ▪️ Литва — 56,1 тис. тонн ▪️ Польща — 51,7 тис. тонн ▪️ Румунія — 34 тис. тонн ▪️ Греція — 24,9 тис. тонн ▪️ Німеччина — 20,9 тис. тонн ▪️ Молдова — 5,8 тис. тонн Особливо різко наростила поставки Польща. Ще у т…
🙏35❤15👍2👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 215 posts we hold for @andriyshTime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 63,929 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Андрющенко Time” (@andriyshTime), 28,117 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andriyshTime.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.