Саід Ісмагілов Ворог втрачає ініціативу на фронті, сили оборони України вдало контратакують і звільняють наші землі навіть на Донбасі. Тому російський режим перейшов в режим терору цивільного населення. Для цього було обрано столицю, і задіяно відносно новий тип дронів на реактивних двигунах. Але найголовніша ворожа хитрість, це тактика безперервних ударів, коли ворог практично без довгих пауз кидає на столицю по де…

Channel
Монова
@monovaolena
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,473subscribers
+166 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001291598383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @monovaolena |
| Description | Чат: t.me/monochrome_chat |
| Created | 5 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/monovaolena |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Монохром” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 33,473 | -32 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 33,505 | -36 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 33,541 | -39 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 33,580 | -43 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 33,623 | -44 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 33,667 | -49 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 33,716 | -476 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 34,192 | +1,795 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:24 | 32,397 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:03 | 32,417 | -21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 32,438 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 32,457 | -24 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 32,481 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 32,491 | -55 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 32,546 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 32,582 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 32,595 | -23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 32,618 | +813 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 31,805 | -1,178 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 32,983 | first reading |
Engagement
336 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.0%
- avg views ÷ 33,473 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,690
- 105 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.65%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 114
- of 336 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 105 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 336 (4 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 912,210 |
| Reactions total | 62,739 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 07:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,400
- Videos
- ≈4,220
- Links
- ≈4,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 03m
- Average length
- 59s
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
193,093 reactions across 303 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 39,556 | 20.5% | |
| ❤ | 38,867 | 20.1% | |
| 😁 | 32,319 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 26,507 | 13.7% | |
| 💯 | 22,862 | 11.8% | |
| 🤣 | 6,728 | 3.48% | |
| 💔 | 6,597 | 3.42% | |
| 🙏 | 4,119 | 2.13% | |
| 🤬 | 2,853 | 1.48% | |
| 😢 | 1,863 | 0.965% | |
| 🤡 | 1,426 | 0.739% | |
| 🤔 | 1,224 | 0.634% | |
| 👏 | 987 | 0.511% | |
| 🤯 | 861 | 0.446% | |
| 🫡 | 634 | 0.328% | |
| 👀 | 570 | 0.295% | |
| 🥰 | 542 | 0.281% | |
| 💊 | 504 | 0.261% | |
| 🍾 | 427 | 0.221% | |
| 🤷♂ | 391 | 0.202% | |
| 45 further kinds | 3,256 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 303 of the 336 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193,093 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 336 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Вимкнула реакції на каналі. Поки що не знаю, тимчасово чи на постійній основі. Хай русня кусає себе за хуй и ригає щщями Мані в пазуху, а не тут під дописами. Тепер до суті. Оці кадри — це майже точна копія кадрів від 11 вересня 2001 року в Нью-Йорку. Теракт, люди у вікнах, позаду вогонь. Тоді на диби встав увесь світ. А зараз світ дивиться, як нас роками вбивають. Мовчки.
Монова pinned a photo
Понеділок останнього тижня перед відправкою чергової партії дронів-перехоплювачів для РУБпАК «Жнець». Відправка, нагадаю, запланована на 3 жовтня, суботу. І у нас є ще пʼять діб, щоб суттєво покращити результат. Станом на 12 годину понеділка маємо сукупно на усіх рахунках Сталевих Птахів 580 тисяч гривень (12,34 дрона). Сподіваюсь до суботи наскирдувати ще на пʼять. Погнали, котики. ПриватБанк⬇️⬇️⬇️ • Посилання, …
Добра така пачка полонених 40+ точно. Це свідчить, що це не просто зачистка н.п. на виступі від розрізнених інфільтрованих груп. Противник міцно намагався тримати плацдарм великими силами. Це ті, яким повезло залишитися живими. Уявіть, яка кількість безповоротно вйобаних та поранених.
Понеділок має починатись з хороших новин
Білецький: «Противник був введений в оману і проспав справжній удар» Третій армійський корпус звільнив Нове, Рідкодуб і Катеринівку та відновив контроль над Карпівкою і Новомихайлівкою. Втрати противника — 2000 живою силою, понад 250 росіян захоплені в полон. Так закінчився третій сезон «Вівальді», переломний для всієї операції. Ми повернули ще 51 км² української землі, а від початку наступальних дій — 176 км². Го…
В Олешки доставили близько чотирьох тисяч кілограмів продуктів одразу на 100 визначених локацій за допомогою дронів, повідомив очільник Херсонської ОВА Прокудін. За його словами, російські військові збивають безпілотники з продовольством, відбирають або перепродають їжу, затримують мешканців і вдаються до насилля, намагаючись зірвати отримання цієї допомоги. Раніше Суспільне поспілкувалося з мешканцями Олешок, які …
Рассел Кроу вийшов покурити з кадру
Про бабушку в трусіках, дасльоз🤧
Ця благословенна земля не могла не народити геніальних митців, настільки вона божественно прекрасна. Коли ходиш вузькими вулицями маленьких містечок Тоскани, з кожним кроком ніби провалюєшся крізь епохи та історичні нашарування. Усе глибше, аж до загадкових етрусків. Які робили довершені, естетично бездоганні речі ще тоді, коли великий Рим був у вовчиці в лоні. Неможливо усі враження за два тижні вмістити у один доп…
Монова pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 336 posts we hold for @monovaolena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@in_factum · 45,08340 postsExilenova+
@exilenova_plus · 297,83210 postsСУСПІЛЬНЕ НОВИНИ
@suspilnenews · 262,7405 postsШрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 97,0213 postsБабель
@babel · 77,5523 postsExile+
@exile_plus · 21,1073 postsТарас Григорович повідомляє
@tgp_news · 58,0912 postsZelenskiy / Official
@v_zelenskiy_official · 670,1402 postsЮрій Богданов
@yb_ua · 26,4872 postsНі, не той самий Болгарін
@ExitedBulgarian · 6,2651 postКирило Буданов
@Kyrylo_Budanov_Official · 54,6941 postПрайс Тайм
@PriceTimeBest · 8,1211 postТретій армійський корпус
@ab3army · 278,6911 postБАЗА, це Хʼюстон
@baza_houston · 45,0611 postInformNapalm
@informnapalm · 131,3501 postОперативний ЗСУ
@operativnoZSU · 366,5241 postМАДЯР🇺🇦
@robert_magyar · 601,8781 postРозвідка Ноєм
@rozvidka_noem · 112,1161 postСоняшник🦅
@soniah_hub · 41,9651 postСуспільне Харків
@suspilne_kharkiv · 108,7711 postТретя світова🪫
@third_svitova · 21,7651 postДесантно-штурмові війська ЗС України
@ua_dshv · 35,1461 postmonitor
@war_monitor · 971,6921 postYIGAL LEVIN
@yigal_levin · 219,0331 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@in_factum · 45,0836 postsБабель
@babel · 77,5524 postsExilenova+
@exilenova_plus · 297,8323 postsШрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 97,0213 postsYIGAL LEVIN
@yigal_levin · 219,0333 postsТретій армійський корпус
@ab3army · 278,6912 postsПозивний Каппа
@KappaHimera · 52,1492 postsКіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno
@kiber_boroshno · 67,7462 postsUkraine context | UC
@ukraine_context · 93,3282 posts3-тя окрема штурмова бригада
@ab3brigade · 44,4751 postБАЗА, це Хʼюстон
@baza_houston · 45,0611 postГоловне управління розвідки МО України
@DIUkraine · 223,7401 postДПСУ | Держприкордонслужба
@DPSUkr · 58,4801 postDroneBomber✙
@dronebomber · 59,3791 postГенеральний штаб ЗСУ
@GeneralStaffZSU · 63,2471 posthromadske
@hromadske_ua · 103,8521 postМіністерство оборони України
@ministry_of_defense_ua · 66,1641 postОперативний ЗСУ
@operativnoZSU · 366,5241 postМАДЯР🇺🇦
@robert_magyar · 601,8781 postПідтримка каналу
@rozvidka_noem_support · 2981 postСлужба безпеки України
@SBUkr · 296,7781 postСоняшник🦅
@soniah_hub · 41,9651 postСуспільне Донбас
@suspilnedonbas · 8,9121 postТретя світова🪫
@third_svitova · 21,7651 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ShrikeNews · 97,021#1
@yigal_levin · 219,033#2
@marshalvdv · 95,378#3
@readshvets · 22,005#4
@lachentyt · 1,552,688#5
@ssternenko · 880,002#6
@informnapalm · 131,350#7
@gistapapapa · 104,724#8
@Tsaplienko · 321,310#9
@D7_channel · 35,242#10
@TruthMinistry · 18,390#11
@kazansky2017 · 149,018#12
@zloyodessit · 82,229#13
@yb_ua · 26,487#14
@RomanShrike · 42,255#15
@ButusovPlus · 348,142#16
@kopytkoav · 26,728#17
@torontotv · 112,045#18
@che_vit · 11,516#19
@berezoview · 140,969#20
@deepstateua · 760,108#21
@nexta_live · 771,869#22
@pandoras_box_ua · 158,995#23
@resurgammmm · 55,369#24
@blackhumourinua · 19,244#25
@dmitriy_chekalkyn · 46,393#26
@ToBeOr_Official · 303,177#27
@censor_net · 183,762#28
@voynareal · 1,514,585#29
@DanaYarovayachannel · 10,914#30
@NazarPrykhodkoPlus · 22,099#31
@huyovy_kharkiv · 465,235#32
@OleksiyDrone · 1,256#33
@privatnamemarnya · 115,804#34
@ukrnastup · 136,116#35
@vert2026 · 117,714#36
@zvizdecmanhustu · 68,310#37
@Pravda_Gerashchenko · 314,739#38
@Nackepelo · 212,531#39
@nvua_official · 49,381#40
@myro_shnykov · 31,081#41
@baza_houston · 45,061#42
@prozapas77 · 38,946#43
@DIUkraine · 223,740#44
@BerezaJuice · 144,096#45
@babchenko77 · 80,587#46
@gudymenko_official · 38,412#47
@nevzorovtv · 1,014,219#48
@notnets · 27,463#49
@a_shtirlitz · 138,200#50
@war_monitor · 971,692#51
@voinasordoy · 200,967#52
@kpszsu · 905,765#53
@ukrbavovna · 711,924#54
@babel · 77,552#55
@smolii_ukraine · 507,485#56
@MirovichMedia · 106,189#57
@belka0509 · 1,516#58
@slvn_pomet · 282,556#59
@bahshiddemon · 171,886#60
@gonimems · 9,082#61
@Zaluzhnui · 240,040#62
@lostanklav · 4,743#63
@gruntmedia · 147,034#64
@romandonik · 21,687#65
@KyivCityOfficial · 400,032#66
@ProtsyshynOfficial · 9,030#67
@usinfantryman1 · 91,638#68
@yzheleznyak · 97,710#69
@mrjalsomino · 10,433#70
@soloviovsensible · 3,380#71
@novinach · 139,706#72
@kyivoperat · 338,582#73
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sytosokrata · 163,253
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
@Shaleniy_Kit · 22,974
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
@RomanShrike · 42,255
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
@prozapas77 · 38,946
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@Omelyan_News · 21,368
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
@D7_channel · 35,242
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
@dmitriy_chekalkyn · 46,393
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
@rozumaha · 23,333
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@gudymenko_official · 38,412
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@nusspavlo · 21,643
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
@romandonik · 21,687
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
@budem_bambit · 22,171
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
@ShrikeNews · 97,021
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
@dragonspech · 39,894
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@babchenko77 · 80,587
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Монова” (@monovaolena), 33,473 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monovaolena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.