Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mortis Æterna / Департамент пасивних заходів

Channel

Mortis Æterna / Департамент пасивних заходів

@mortisaeterna

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,706subscribers

+19,664 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001703163442
TypeChannel
Username@mortisaeterna
Created1 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mortisaeterna

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4019,7279,883.56 August 2026 — 42 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40 subscribers18 August 2026 — 42 subscribers26 August 2026 — 44 subscribers3 September 2026 — 43 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,727 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,727 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,721 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,703 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,706 subscribers19,7066 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 41 days, net +19,664. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 14:0119,706+3
14 Sept 2026, 20:3919,703-18
13 Sept 2026, 06:0019,721-6
11 Sept 2026, 08:2219,727no change
11 Sept 2026, 08:1619,727+19,684
3 Sept 2026, 01:0243-1
26 Aug 2026, 03:4944+2
18 Aug 2026, 21:5442+2
12 Aug 2026, 19:2640-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:5742first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 19,706 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,720
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held17 (9 September 202611 September 2026)
Views total91,520
Reactions total2,524
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,524 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌚98238.9%
🫡37915.0%
🤡30912.2%
👍26010.3%
2148.48%
🔥1495.90%
1435.67%
😢632.50%
🥰220.872%
❤‍🔥30.119%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,524 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC≈2,450 views70 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Знавці, підкажіть, будь ласка - чи муситиму я пояснювати за шмот, якщо...?

🌚681😢1

11 Sept 2026, 05:07 UTC≈3,700 views137 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Ну тобто коли в тебе є ядерна зброя, то "Він (Кім Чен Ін) завжди ставився до мене з повагою, ми з ним добре ладнаємо", або "Saar, ми можемо з вами поговорити, Saar" (не думати про Кеша Пателя, не думати про Кеша Пателя) Неправильні ти сигнали подаєш, рижа мавпо, ой неправильні

👍65🌚38🤡29🥰41

10 Sept 2026, 23:58 UTC≈4,500 views105 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Були часи

😢62🫡38👍2🔥21

10 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC≈6,940 views338 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Аби не по Броварах, а так в добру путь

193🌚84🔥36🤡118👍6

10 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC≈5,670 views20 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍11🫡71🔥1

10 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC≈5,550 views67 reactionsread 11 September 2026

І ще один, перепрошую за зайоби, але воно того вартує, якщо я знову відкрию канал

42🫡15👍10

10 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC≈5,530 views83 reactionsread 11 September 2026

Це пост для тесту бота, який автоматично різатиме хуренботів, не звертайте увагу

🌚65🫡162

10 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTCviews —

Mortis Æterna / Департамент пасивних заходів pinned a photo

10 Sept 2026, 09:19 UTC≈7,130 views101 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Кадія-Прайм пережила 12 Чорних Хрестових Походів та вистояла майже 10000 років. Попри руйнування самої планети, система Кадія стоїть і стоятиме завжди, бо Кадія - це люди, що її обороняли. Наша Кадія - це Мала Токмачка, і Мала Токмачка стоїть. І стоятиме завжди. Патч "Мала Токмачка" можна отримати за донат на суму від 270 гривень у Фонд ПВК «Фрірен». Кількість доступних патчів обмежена 40 одиницями. Щодо доставки

67🫡21🔥8👍5

10 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC≈5,820 views205 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Ох і хуйня

🌚129🤡66👍82

10 Sept 2026, 05:44 UTC≈6,230 views211 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🫡121👍53🌚23🥰83🤡3

10 Sept 2026, 05:37 UTC≈5,890 views206 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Це не підкуп, якщо це всього лише ОБІЦЯНКА ПІДКУПУ, а обіцянки-цяцянки, як нам всім відомо

🌚178🤡1842👍2🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mortisaeterna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

політ технолога ✙ ▵
@yaroslavivval · 25,021
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 September 2026
Юрій Богданов
@yb_ua · 26,448
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Ооо нейромережеве🐱
@oooneuro · 26,144
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
WAS. Популярна Історія
@wasmedia_ua · 24,356
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
Не Олексій
@notnets · 27,444
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
УП. Кляті питання
@ukr_pravda · 24,877
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 September 2026
Sonya Koshkina (official)
@sonyakoshkina · 26,502
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
Алексей Копытько
@kopytkoav · 26,791
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Соціально-Побутовий Журнал «Водограй»
@mag_vodogray · 25,706
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 September 2026
Lobby X ARMY
@lobbyxArmy · 26,943
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Олександр Нотевський
@notevskyi · 26,136
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Повернись живим
@savelifeua · 24,683
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Сергій Філімонов
@FilimonovGonor · 33,779
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 September 2026
Є ПИТАННЯ
@e_p_2026 · 26,513
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Центр протидії корупції_
@fuckcorruption · 25,745
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mortis Æterna / Департамент пасивних заходів” (@mortisaeterna), 19,706 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mortisaeterna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.