Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -970. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,151–35,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 06:58
34,302
-25
10 Nov 2026, 02:40
34,327
-12
8 Nov 2026, 19:58
34,339
-18
7 Nov 2026, 11:58
34,357
-11
6 Nov 2026, 12:25
34,368
-10
5 Nov 2026, 11:51
34,378
-6
4 Nov 2026, 13:21
34,384
-9
3 Nov 2026, 15:30
34,393
-47
2 Nov 2026, 14:47
34,440
-12
1 Nov 2026, 16:17
34,452
-6
31 Oct 2026, 15:07
34,458
-16
30 Oct 2026, 13:00
34,474
-8
29 Oct 2026, 09:29
34,482
-2
28 Oct 2026, 06:44
34,484
-1
27 Oct 2026, 04:18
34,485
-8
26 Oct 2026, 01:57
34,493
-6
25 Oct 2026, 03:48
34,499
-9
24 Oct 2026, 03:10
34,508
-11
23 Oct 2026, 02:46
34,519
-7
21 Oct 2026, 23:56
34,526
first reading
Engagement
360 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 34,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,300
107 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 360 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
360 (31 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
781,300
Reactions total
15,853
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,510
Videos
≈623
Links
≈7,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 17s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
60,117 reactions across 352 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
24,275
40.4%
❤🔥
11,954
19.9%
🔥
9,005
15.0%
💯
3,929
6.54%
🫡
2,515
4.18%
😁
2,161
3.59%
😢
1,114
1.85%
🤣
1,016
1.69%
🤯
992
1.65%
🤬
895
1.49%
😭
639
1.06%
💔
372
0.619%
custom 5370810157871667232
361
0.6%
🍾
340
0.566%
custom 5372886001465170842
316
0.526%
custom 5373161588041718232
154
0.256%
🍌
51
0.085%
🕊
28
0.047%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 356 of the 360 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60,664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 360 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
41
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 356 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alphacentaurichannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 360 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 109 posts held from the last 30 days (10.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
УВАГА, СТОП ЗБІР!!!
Дякуємо всім, хто долучилися, друзі, кошти поступали безпосередньо на банку представників підрозділу, тож будемо чекати на закупівлю та звіт!
Ми провели розіграш призів: 3 переможця, які отримують футболки від бригади, 5 переможців, що отримають книги на вибір та 4 переможця, які отримають конструктори. Перевіряйте застосунок Монобанку: переможці розіграшу мали отримати сповіщення від Моно з зап…
Starship: МИ НА ОРБІТІ
Друзі, переклали й озвучили для вас новий півгодинний фільм SpaceX про попереднє випробування Starship — перший успішний орбітальний політ надважкого корабля!
В цей вікенд має відбутися наступне випробування, очікуйте анонсів найближчим часом.
https://youtu.be/dW8TQLUdVv0
Пентагон підтримає розроблення нової багаторазової ракети Rocket Lab
Міністерство оборони США має намір надати компанії 150 мільйонів доларів, щоб допомогти наростити виробництво носія та розширити цим можливості американської космічної галузі.
https://thealphacentauri.net/170197/
Зерна циркону, апатиту й вітлокіту зберігають сліди давніх ударів: коли ті сталися і скільки енергії виділили. Команда Кім Коун з Рочестерського університету відтворила такі удари в лабораторії й з'ясувала, що той самий тиск не завжди однаково змінює мікроструктуру мінералів. Стаття вийшла в Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets.
На Землі підтверджено менше ніж 200 ударних структур, решту стерли тектоніка й ерозі…
Швидкість роботи «Старлінк» під час руху знову обмежили. Ми недовго раділи. Тому знову виникли проблеми зі зв’язком із вертольотами, які переслідують «Шахеди», та з реактивними перехоплювачами, які збивають реактивні «Шахеди».
Ймовірно, американська сторона буде посилатися на умови військового тарифного плану для України, але кілька років ці умови нікого не турбували.
До того ж будь-які умови можна змінювати й обгов…
Як сісти на супутник, де майже немає гравітації: місія MMX летить до Фобоса
Нова велика стаття на нашому сайті! Фобос — 27-кілометрова купа щебеню з гравітацією в 1800 разів слабшою за земну, і досі ніхто не знає, звідки він узявся. Місія MMX, яка стартувала 20 жовтня, спробує на нього сісти, проїхатися ровером і привезти 10 грамів пилу — щоб нарешті з’ясувати походження марсіанських супутників.
https://thealphacen…
Біля Alba Mons, найбільшого за площею вулкана Марса, з ґрунту просочується хлороводень (HCl). Автори статті, що вийшла 4 листопада в Science Advances, пов'язують його з рідкою магмою на глибині. Газ тримається в нижніх 10 км атмосфери, до 1,5 частки на мільярд, і з'являється тоді, коли його там бути не повинно.
Хлороводень виявив Atmospheric Chemistry Suite — три інфрачервоні спектрометри на Trace Gas Orbiter від ES…
Тим часом для наших спонсорів та патронів у ранньому доступі вийшов фільм SpaceX про перший успішний орбітальний політ Starship!
Переглянути його можуть спонсори на:
Монобазі
Донателло
YouTube
Patreon
Buy me a Coffee
В загальному доступі відео буде завтра ввечері.
Дякуємо за підтримку і бажаємо всім приємного перегляду! А також нагадуємо, що за донат на рівні "Десятник" і вище ви отримуєте доступ до нашого закрито…
AST SpaceMobile планує самостійно виводити супутники на орбіту
Для цього компанія має намір створити власну ракету Blacklift і вже уклала угоду з Firefly Aerospace щодо постачання двигунів для майбутнього носія та передачі технологій їхнього виробництва.
https://thealphacentauri.net/170173/
❕До мети залишилось 47 000 грн❕
Друзі, до нас по допомогу звернулися захисники, що несуть службу у 4й бригаді НГУ «Рубіж». Ми плануємо зібрати кошти на детектори дронів «Чуйка» версій 3.0 або 4.0:
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/AMeBwb3Cat
За будь-який донат ви отримаєте можливість виграти брендовану футболку безпосередньо від бригади, а за донат, кратний 400 грн, п'ятеро учасників зможуть обрати у подарунок від каналу…
🔥55🫡10custom 53728860014651708424
Showing the 12 most recent of 360 posts we hold for @alphacentaurichannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alphacentaurichannel edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @alphacentaurichannel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
16 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
It's a good trip @igtrip · 23,329 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 October 2026
WAS. Популярна Історія @wasmedia_ua · 25,951 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
Мілітарний @milinua · 74,612 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Molfar про OSINT @molfar_global · 54,422 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
F1UA @f1ua_f1 · 23,624 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика @ShklovskyStr · 19,219 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 October 2026
Повернись живим @savelifeua · 24,389 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
D7 NEWS | Демократична Сокира @D7_channel · 35,234 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко @gudymenko_official · 38,802 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Mortis Æterna / Департамент пасивних заходів @mortisaeterna · 19,322 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 September 2026
Ооо нейромережеве🐱 @oooneuro · 26,826 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Armchair General UA ✙ @armchairgeneralUA · 43,272 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
QWERTY @qwerty_live · 21,516 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Весёлый Электронщик @radiolubitelTV · 21,388 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
Не Олексій @notnets · 28,369 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
Аудіокниги українською @abookua · 55,294 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Будем всех бамбить! @budem_bambit · 20,422 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Шрайк @RomanShrike · 42,227 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
✙Resurgam✙ @resurgammmm · 55,683 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine @itarmyofukraine2022 · 105,797 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Vert Dider @vertdider · 27,122 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alpha Centauri | Космос” (@alphacentaurichannel), 34,302 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alphacentaurichannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.