Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Армія минулого

@oldzsu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,976subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001626399315
TypeChannel
Username@oldzsu
DescriptionКанал присвячений історії збройних сил та інших силових структур України від розпаду СРСР до кінця АТО. Також іноді розбваляємо іншим цікавинками. Звязок з адміном - https://t.me/oldzsu_bot
Created28 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/oldzsu

Growth

1,9766 Aug 2026, 10:02 — 1,976 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 11:30 — 1,976 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 10:026 Aug 2026, 11:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,974–1,978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 11:301,976no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:021,976first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,360
Videos
29
Links
70

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 19s
Average length
2m 19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,452 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍44230.4%
🫡35124.2%
27418.9%
🔥845.79%
❤‍🔥775.30%
😭594.06%
😢523.58%
😁483.31%
🤩221.52%
🤝110.758%
🥰110.758%
💊60.413%
🤯50.344%
🙈40.275%
😱30.207%
20.138%
👻10.069%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,452reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2025 to 24 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 May 2025, 18:36 UTC≈4,470 views184 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бійці добровольчого батальйону «Херсон» МВС України укріплюють пожежну машину для виходу з оточення. Іловайськ, серпень 2014 року.

🫡16710👍6😭1

24 Mar 2025, 08:17 UTC≈5,450 views101 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Британський шолом Mk.6 та десантник ВДВ 2011-12 роки

🔥78👍19🙈4

20 Mar 2025, 16:38 UTC≈6,280 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бійці 8-го полку спеціального призначення ГУР з прапором частини та прапором 8 обр СпП радянської армії. 15 грудня 2015 року

👍68😁32🫡112

14 Mar 2025, 11:17 UTC≈4,270 views123 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добровольці майбутнього 1-го резервного батальйону НГУ з прапором самооборони майдану. 14 березня 2014 року, Нові Петрівці

84🫡20👍13🤝42

13 Mar 2025, 12:41 UTC≈3,450 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PSDinfo

#Спорядження “Дубок” – останній камуфляж СРСР та символ старої армії Це камуфляж, який за 30 років став легендарним. Хоч він і вважається морально застарілим – багатьом його вигляд гріє душу та пробуджує спогади. Це малюнок який ми бачили всюди – від військових до дідів на риболовлі. Це Дубок. Детальніше у матеріалі. 📩Telegram 🕊Instagram 🕊Twitter 📹YouTube 📹Discord

👍41🤝73😁3🤩2

10 Mar 2025, 12:23 UTC≈3,130 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Підрозділи МВС Грузії на параді 2004 рік, Тбілісі

63👍18🫡9😁3😭3

6 Mar 2025, 15:49 UTC≈3,740 views128 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Техніка сил АТО на обочині дебальцевської траси. 31 січня 2015 року

🫡114👍9🥰4😭1

3 Mar 2025, 10:08 UTC≈4,570 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

БТР-152 на озброєнні американської поліції. Переданий вірогідно від Єгипту, звідти потрапив до частин OPFOR, а потім і до поліції Індіанополіс, 90ті

👍69🤩20🥰7🤯5😁3😱31

1 Mar 2025, 15:55 UTC≈3,120 views103 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Захоплений силами 51-ї ОМБр у бойовиків з групи "Оплот" танк Т-72Б1, пізніше буде передано до складу 20-го ОМПБ "Дніпропетровськ" де буде служити мінімум до літа 2015 року. Вересень 2014 року

👍8512🔥6

28 Feb 2025, 20:43 UTC≈3,410 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😭54🫡277💊2😁2👻1

28 Feb 2025, 20:42 UTC≈3,210 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

з кожним днем все гірше і гірше

👍25😁5

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @oldzsu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Армія минулого” (@oldzsu), 1,976 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oldzsu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.