Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DroneBomber✙

@dronebomber

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

57,161subscribers

+625 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247871075
TypeChannel
Username@dronebomber
DescriptionМи все бачимо ☠️ Підтримка - t.me/dronebomber/468 Звʼязок - @dronebomber_bot
Created21 June 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dronebomber

Growth

56,53657,16156,848.56 August 2026 — 56,536 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,536 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,565 subscribers7 August 2026 — 56,673 subscribers8 August 2026 — 56,771 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,784 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56,965 subscribers11 August 2026 — 57,004 subscribers12 August 2026 — 57,161 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net +625. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,442–57,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:3357,161+157
11 Aug 2026, 07:0157,004+39
10 Aug 2026, 07:0356,965+181
9 Aug 2026, 08:0156,784+13
8 Aug 2026, 09:1556,771+98
7 Aug 2026, 11:0556,673+108
6 Aug 2026, 13:3056,565+29
6 Aug 2026, 01:4556,536no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4256,536first reading

Engagement

136 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.3%
avg views ÷ 57,161 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,600
136 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
136
of 136 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held136 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total3,212,392
Reactions total105,886
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13,600
Videos
5,510
Links
20,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
33m 55s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

86,365 reactions across 116 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥39,86846.2%
18,71921.7%
😁10,59812.3%
👍5,7636.67%
😢1,9002.20%
😡1,6211.88%
🤣1,4641.70%
🥰1,3861.60%
👀1,3441.56%
custom 58321945027936294157600.88%
🫡5930.687%
🤯5050.585%
😭4440.514%
🍌3250.376%
🗿2380.276%
custom 54179798337685170302130.247%
🤔1900.22%
😍1570.182%
custom 54138405160872946521370.159%
😱1020.118%
2 further kinds380.044%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105,886reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 136 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dronebomber. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 136 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈4,290 views361 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Слава ДШВ 🫡

257🔥59🫡42🥰3

Signed Тимур Русланович

12 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈5,590 views582 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Слава Силам Оборони 🫡

415🫡102🔥59🤣4💋1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC≈4,680 views462 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @deepstateuaPhoto

🔄 Мапу оновлено ➡️ Сили Оборони України звільнили Зелений Гай, Новохатське, Грушівське, Толстой, Зірку, Ялту, Піддубне, Мирне, Воскресенку, Січневе, Воронне, Тернове, Березове, Степове, Калинівське, Привілля, Злагоду, Рибне та Красногірське. ⚔️ Ворога відкинуто у Новопавлівці, Новогеоргіївці, Новомиколаївці, Новогригорівці, Запорізькому та Привільному. ✈️ Підтримайте збір для хлопців з 46 ОАеМБр на оптичні каб

🔥32391🫡33👀6🤯3😁3😱3

12 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC≈11,400 views601 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Була доповідь за результатами сьогоднішньої нашої операції щодо Новоросійська, — Зеленський. Комбіноване застосування далекобійних санкцій нашою зброєю. Успішна операція. Вдячний воїнам за влучність і розробникам та виробникам нашої зброї за відчутне посилення українських засобів. Уперше в одній операції злагоджено спрацювали «Паляниця», «Пекло», «Барс» і «Довгий Нептун», а також дрони MICH, Fire Point, «Рамзай», «С

433👍77🔥56🍌12😁12custom 58321945027936294157🤣4

12 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈15,900 views824 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Нахуя збивати, якщо можна втікти 👍

😁709👍5328🤣26🔥6🍌1💔1

12 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈10,700 views531 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @exilenova_plusPhoto

Новоросійськ 12.08 Одна з найуспішніших атак Сил оборони України на одне з самих захищених міст росії. НКХП — зерновий і мазутний термінали База ВМФ РФ у Новоросійську Нафтоекспортний термінал «Шесхаріс» 1. НКХП — зерновий і мазутний термінали Зафіксовані ураження: На території зернового терміналу НКХП помітні численні ураження зерносховищ та об’єктів транспортної інфраструктури, зокрема елеваторів. НКХП є одни

🔥42961👍29🥰3🫡3🤔2😁2🗿1

12 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈12,500 views484 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ExitedBulgarianVideo

Пам'ятаєте кадри, коли невідомий шахедоподібний дрон влетів у вантажний корабель «Надежда» біля Новоросійська? Тоді з'явилося багато питань: що це за дрон? Чи це єгипетський Jabbar-150, турецький Troy T20 Block 20 або китайський ZTK-150? Насправді ж то був український дрон — MICH 2000. І ті, хто думав про варіант із китайським ZTK-150, були не далекі від правди. Історія «Міча» почалася наприкінці 2023 року, коли к

298🔥132👍36🥰7🤣5🫡2custom 54179798337685170302🗿1

Signed Kirill

12 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈18,200 views1,110 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Орськ, було уражено всі 4 АВТ що є на заводі. Одна з найуспішніших атак на НПЗ за останній час. — Exilenova

671🔥364👍29custom 583219450279362941518😍11🥰7🤣4🫡3

12 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈16,600 views898 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Смачні хрюки йдуть від осінтерів, щодо Новоросійська, почекаємо.

595👀198🔥72👍18😁6🤣4🍌2🥰2

12 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈14,500 views461 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @army_1uscVideo

«СВО тепер у них за вікнами» Каспер, заступник командира 1 Окремого центру СБС, розповідає про те, як знищення російських систем ППО та РЛС відкриває дорогу для далекобійних ударів по стратегічних об'єктах ворога. За місяць роботи знищено десятки комплексів ППО та радіолокаційних станцій, що дало змогу відпрацювати по портах Усть-Луга, Приморськ та НПЗ «Новатек». Далі більше! Це лише початок серії випусків із Касп

300🔥122👍27🫡9😁2🍌1

12 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈18,400 views936 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новоросійськ відкрили аж 7 вейпшопів і 7 кальянних Розвітіє малого бізнесу іде за планом

😁646🔥217👍34🤣1712custom 58321945027936294159🗿1

12 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC≈18,600 views734 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ось тут на відео заявляється, що прилетіло щось реактивне, можливо «Нептун», можливо «Паляниця».

🔥64737👍32custom 58321945027936294159🤣4🗿3😁1custom 54179798337685170301

Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @dronebomber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@dronebomber edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,715 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

AnalitikaUA.net
@analitikauanet · 6,176
3 posts
Неврівноважене 🇺🇦 божевілля
@justlaughere · 4,878
3 posts
✙ Мертва русня ✙
@mertvarysnya · 11,566
3 posts
△ Конотопський Вартовий
@rlsradar · 55,507
3 posts
ꑭ ЮРІЙ ТКАЧ ꑭ #УкрТґ
@underflurry · 151
3 posts
Жодино Для Жизни
@Zhodino_channel · 54
3 posts
3 Окрема Диванна Бригада #ISupportFedorov
@divannabrigada · 626
2 posts
ГАВРИЩАК_news
@Havryshchak_Ihor · 5,365
2 posts
INKARA ✙
@INKARAtg · 1,247
2 posts
Ukrainian🇺🇦heart💙💛
@KhersonkaMari · 507
2 posts
spetsnazer
@spetsnazer_TG · 10,594
2 posts
Повітряна тривога Київ △
@airAlarm_Kyiv · 82,633
1 post
➔ △ ✙ Аналітика до кінця особливого періоду | #УкрТґ
@analisys_untill_spe · 43
1 post
Холодным Апрельским утром
@aprilth · 283
1 post
Chibukhchyan live
@armenchibukhchyan · 13,612
1 post
КІБЕР ВІЙСЬКО 🇺🇦
@armycyberukr · 1,283
1 post
🔥 Сегодня Горит 🔥
@bavoovna · 20
1 post
@BrennpunktUA
@BrennpunktUA · 3,883
1 post
△Buryn Alert
@bsburyn · 6,264
1 post
CIPSO
@CIPSO_TV · 360
1 post
Славик Украине
@cjiaweak · 6,962
1 post
Crimea News 🔱🇺🇦🇪🇺
@CrimeainnachatUA · 889
1 post
демшиза ии киберпанк
@dempunk · 54
1 post
Дисидент
@dusident · 10,054
1 post
Ента
@enta_nationalist_14 · 309
1 post
Фейкові новини
@faqend_from_ua · 64
1 post
Franfran2424
@franfran2424_ES · 294
1 post
Голос Орлівки📢🚨
@GolosOrlivky · 299
1 post
💙Моніторинг Львівщини | Важливе в Україні 💛
@golovneukraini · 30
1 post
Життя за лаштунками
@grungeandre · 160
1 post
Харош BALAKATЬ
@HaroshBalakat · 4,657
1 post
ІПСО • News #ISupportFedorov
@ipso_news_real · 1,775
1 post
1488
@Kherson1488 · 1,018
1 post
⊞➔🐆🍉✙ Kurwa Union ✙🍉🐆➔⊞| #УкрТґ
@kurwa_union · 233
1 post
Lab. Journal vol. 2
@labjour · 77
1 post
Голова Павука
@marginalpauk · 7,378
1 post
𝐾𝑁𝑌𝑆𝑇𝐸𝑅 𝑀𝐼𝐿𝐼𝑇𝐴𝑅𝑌
@military_knyster · 73
1 post
Містак
@mistake_tv · 101
1 post
Nord Division
@norddivision11 · 43,580
1 post
△Охтирський Простір ☀️
@Okhtyrsky_Prostir · 10,797
1 post
oleg4tor
@oleg4tor29 · 201
1 post
Пруфи🇺🇦Дніпра
@Proofs_Dnepr1 · 3,443
1 post
PMC RedSun
@redpowersun · 149
1 post
RedSignal | UA
@RedSignalllU · 349
1 post
Щербатий черепок 18+/-
@sh4erba · 38
1 post
Штурвал ⚓️
@Shturval_media · 12,930
1 post
SUMYLIKE TG
@sumyliketop · 151,953
1 post
Свеса△INFО
@svessainfo · 11,418
1 post
Це Європа
@UA_is_EU · 10
1 post
Метал[core] українською | #УкрТґ
@ukr_metal · 389
1 post
Українська Фея🧚🏻‍♀️
@ukranian_fairy88 · 8,517
1 post
Ukrainian Military Review
@umilitary · 2,568
1 post
Levaki
@username_levak · 9
1 post
ДРОНИ ПРИКОРДОННЯ
@wallofdrones · 43
1 post
✙WoW✙
@wow_ua2 · 6,695
1 post
Женьок Вещає…
@ZhenyokSay · 141,037
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DroneBomber✙” (@dronebomber), 57,161 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dronebomber.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.