Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ХАЙЛАЙТЕР

Channel

ХАЙЛАЙТЕР

@goshakartsevcalling

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,877subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001235396106
TypeChannel
Username@goshakartsevcalling
DescriptionОднажды кондитер, питающийся чипсами, федеральный журналист и жиголо из культурной столицы решили создать оптимистичный канал про великий и могучий русский lifestyle Для новостей, предложений и пожеланий @alexandra_kimm Мы в РКН: https://clck.ru/3FAjYF
Created9 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/goshakartsevcalling

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39,78740,25740,0225 August 2026 — 39,917 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,917 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,837 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,076 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,025 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,984 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,033 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,203 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,134 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,104 subscribers15 August 2026 — 40,051 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,088 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,929 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,103 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,065 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,049 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,002 subscribers23 August 2026 — 40,174 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,086 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,950 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,152 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,973 subscribers29 August 2026 — 40,139 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39,787 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,257 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,857 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,091 subscribers4 September 2026 — 40,174 subscribers7 September 2026 — 40,214 subscribers10 September 2026 — 40,037 subscribers12 September 2026 — 40,244 subscribers14 September 2026 — 40,200 subscribers15 September 2026 — 40,125 subscribers17 September 2026 — 40,066 subscribers29 September 2026 — 39,877 subscribers39,8775 August 202629 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 55 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,717–40,328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 17:4139,877-189
17 Sept 2026, 23:2140,066-59
15 Sept 2026, 17:4040,125-75
14 Sept 2026, 04:0040,200-44
12 Sept 2026, 11:3840,244+207
10 Sept 2026, 09:3840,037-177
7 Sept 2026, 03:5640,214+40
4 Sept 2026, 12:3940,174+83
3 Sept 2026, 01:1740,091+234
2 Sept 2026, 01:3739,857-400
1 Sept 2026, 01:4640,257+470
31 Aug 2026, 01:4639,787-352
29 Aug 2026, 22:2640,139+166
28 Aug 2026, 21:3539,973-179
27 Aug 2026, 23:3340,152+202
27 Aug 2026, 01:2439,950-136
25 Aug 2026, 23:1740,086+214
24 Aug 2026, 23:1439,872-302
23 Aug 2026, 07:4740,174+172
21 Aug 2026, 21:3740,002first reading

Engagement

566 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.00%
avg views ÷ 39,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,190
288 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.897%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
288
of 566 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held566 (5 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total918,414
Reactions total8,239
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈22,300
Videos
≈4,120
Links
≈931

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 19m
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 171 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,503 reactions across 558 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,52533.5%
🔥3,91823.7%
👍2,92917.7%
💯2,24413.6%
🤣1,0126.13%
😱2781.68%
🥰2021.22%
👀1410.854%
😢570.345%
🙏410.248%
🤮320.194%
🍾260.158%
🤔250.151%
🤯250.151%
🤡220.133%
🆒120.073%
⚡80.048%
🤬60.036%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 566 of the 566 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,724 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 566 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 566 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goshakartsevcalling. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 566 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,050 views16 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

На парижской Неделе моды прошёл показ, отражавший бремя неравенства и эксплуатации, выпавшее на долю темнокожего населения. Активизм активизмом, конечно. А мода-то будет?

👍5💯4❤3🔥3😱1

30 Sept 2026, 10:33 UTC≈2,050 views24 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Нас ждёт новая экранизация «Маленького принца» Режиссёром игрового фильма станет Мортен Тильдум («Игра в имитацию»), сценарием займётся Саймон Бофой («Миллионер из трущоб»). Фильм объединит биографию автора Антуана де Сент-Экзюпери и историю Маленького принца. Второго создадут с помощью визуальных эффектов на основе иллюстраций Жоанна Сфара, который оформил книгу Экзюпери в 2008 году.

👍7🔥7❤5💯4👀1

30 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,230 views27 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Дэвид Бекхэм снова манит нас спокойствием загородной жизни. На этот раз в новом кампейне для Boss, а не в своём дачном блоге. Говорит, для этой коллекции он вдохновлялся собственным гардеробом и... загородной эстетикой, конечно.

❤10🔥7👍4💯4👀2

30 Sept 2026, 07:49 UTC≈2,380 views36 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Том Хиддлстон в свежей съёмке для британского Men's Health. Помните такого? Кажется, он полностью оправдывает название журнала и выглядит здорово. Скоро выйдет фильм «Тенцинг» о восхождении на Эверест. В нём Хиддлстон сыграл роль новозеландского альпиниста и исследователя сэра Эдмунда Хиллари. И после отзывов критиков, которые успели увидеть новое кино, оно получило безупречный рейтинг. Но мы-то с вами знаем, что …

🔥16❤9💯7👍4

30 Sept 2026, 06:35 UTC≈2,720 views26 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Если успех Юры Борисова в Голливуде Саша Петров как-то пережил, то начало голливудской карьеры Стаса Барецкого он может и не вывезти.

👍7🤣6❤5🔥5💯3

30 Sept 2026, 05:32 UTC≈2,880 views30 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Настроение к среде. Доброе утро!

👍11💯9❤7🔥3

29 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC≈3,350 views46 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Луна и цветы в работах художника Aseel Swaid. #КрасивоеНаНочь

❤28🔥9👍4💯4🥰1

29 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,270 views24 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Час от часу не легче… Тут бы с реальными разобраться🤪

❤9👍4💯4😱4🔥3

29 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈2,510 views26 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Просветминутка — про пуговицы на одежде. Замечали, что на женской одежде пуговицы обычно пришиты слева, а на мужской — справа? Девочки, ну тут можно и возмутиться: изначально пуговицы были вообще только на мужской одежде, в то время как женщинам оставили шнуровку, завязки и крючки… Ну, а у мужчин пуговицы распологались справа потому, что оружие обычно носили слева, а хватались за него, как правило, правой рукой. П…

👍10❤7🔥5💯4

29 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,760 views28 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Потрясающее опалесцентное стекланное блюдо 1920-х годов. Винтаж родом из Франции. #ЗаметкиАристократа

❤14🔥6👍4💯4

29 Sept 2026, 15:10 UTC≈2,950 views30 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Белорусский дизайнер Егор Жданович представил пуховик из настоящего лугового сена с полей своей родины. Модная новинка стоит около 50 000 российских рублей. Парень объясняет свой творческий порыв тягой к простоте и естественности после того, как сам перестал курить и пить алкоголь, а вместе с тем стал иначе относится к удовольствию в жизни.

❤12🔥9👍6💯3

29 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC≈3,080 views19 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Мы ни на что не намекаем, но сейчас 17:00, мадамы и мадемуазели😆

🔥8❤4👍3💯3🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 566 posts we hold for @goshakartsevcalling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,646
#1
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 100,724
#2
Каждой твари - кампари
@tvrkmpr · 22,746
#3
СИНЬКА
@thynk · 70,521
#4
Рады, но не от всего сердца
@neotvsego · 9,664
#5
Фёдор, Бонд и Чук
@FBChu · 44,983
#6
Телеканал Страз
@CTPA3bI · 16,334
#7
Георгиева Снежанна
@marvelous2309 · 38,269
#8
Нам нравится ♥️
@likeitvery · 20,197
#9
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402
#10
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 504,356
#11
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,952
#12
Банкста
@banksta · 438,371
#13
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,178,521
#14
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 381,978
#15
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,261
#16
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,698
#17
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 354,527
#18
Скромное Обаяние Пацана
@kukan_sportif · 38,117
#19
MUR
@fashion_mur · 208,487
#20
Не последние люди в городе
@neposlednielyudi · 57,590
#21
Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 84,226
#22
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,375
#23
БП онлайн
@bponline · 111,120
#24
🐍МОСКВИЧКА🐍
@glavmoskvichka · 34,917
#25
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 176,821
#26
Караван Ахуительных Историй
@karavanahuitelnyhistoriy · 48,816
#27
НеМалахов
@nemalahov · 126,653
#28
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,409
#29
Героиня Cool Girl
@kurochki_govoryat · 36,192
#30
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,120
#31
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,691
#32
Караульный Z
@karaulny · 120,244
#33
Дневник Лауры Д
@Lauradjagadiary · 76,370
#34
Дарья Насонова
@taumos · 6,522
#35
СЕРГЕЙ НАУМОВ
@naumita · 59,917
#36
СВЕЖЕСТИ
@svezhesti · 141,401
#37
НЕПРОЗАМУЖ
@mortalbeauty · 46,391
#38
Медиасрачи 3.0
@mediasrachi3 · 15,719
#39
Модные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 73,552
#40
Pink Birkin
@pinkbirkin · 13,933
#41
Кристина Потупчик
@krispotupchik · 151,525
#42
НЕПРИНЦЕССА
@im_not_aprincess · 50,148
#43
VOICE
@darkvoicemag · 44,826
#44
Soroka Diary by Маша Лобанова
@zasorokdiary · 10,199
#45
Записки Мари
@iamjustagirlmari · 251
#46
Бахчисарайские гвоздики
@darkmgimo · 106,688
#47
Говорящая Тыква
@talking_pumpkin · 32,281
#48
Темы. Главное (ГлавМедиа)
@glavmedia · 66,576
#49
продюсер от бг
@producerbg · 3,102
#50
Светские крошки LIVE
@svetskiekroshki · 79,040
#51
Алло, Галочка, ты не поверишь!
@hello_galochka · 34,501
#52
звездец какой-то
@etzvezdets · 64,061
#53
Вера в курсе
@verochkavkurse · 39,242
#54
superficial space cadet
@superficialspacecadet · 24,767
#55
Кейт Бланш
@kate_blanche · 322,154
#56
Луис Иванович
@LIVfashionmag · 202,818
#57
Самые СЛИВки
@samye_slyvky · 52,315
#58
Diana Live
@dianalivelive · 42,976
#59
КРАСОТА ТРЕБУЕТ КЭШ
@beautycash · 56,874
#60
Медиа хабалки
@MediaHabalki · 49,152
#61
Светский хроник
@svetskyhronik · 47,773
#62
Хватит слухов!
@hvatit_sluhov · 16
#63
Instafoodpassion
@instafoodpassion · 27,327
#64
Кино. Бэкстейдж
@backstage_moscow · 3,534
#65
Лобушкин
@lobushkin · 100,243
#66
МУД
@okeymood · 35,731
#67
Тулуп Тутберидзе
@tuluptut · 41,089
#68
Сорока-барокко
@SorokaBarokko · 18,622
#69
Медиаменеджер от бога
@journalizm · 365
#70
Карл Маркетинг
@karl_marketing · 458
#71
Kochegov Konstantin
@KochegovK · 6,020
#72
Verve
@linktoverve · 412
#73
Pitnica
@pitnica_all · 2,117
#74
Хуже и не скажешь
@badphrase · 52,554
#75
KSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,655
#76
Правила жизни
@pravilamagru · 63,713
#77
Печенюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 34,505
#78
Журнал «Москвичка»
@moskvichka_mag · 102,322
#79
С вишнёвой любовью!
@cherryktyouth · 180
#80
Медиавойны
@mediavoyni · 38,944
#81
Миллиарды
@overbillions · 31,402
#82
PROCUDA
@procuda_com · 387
#83
Как они растут?
@kak_rastut · 490
#84
ЯрНьюс
@yarnewsnet · 3,365
#85
Обжор мемов
@obzhormemov · 1,331
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Страна Z
@Z_strana · 112,400
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
МИР Z
@new_world_Z · 108,313
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ХАЙЛАЙТЕР” (@goshakartsevcalling), 39,877 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goshakartsevcalling.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.