Channel
@Lady_etiquette
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
120,998subscribers
-4,902 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001791272429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lady_etiquette |
| Description | Искусство жить ✨ Регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3FJuST Реклама: https://taplink.cc/nikylka Дзен: https://dzen.ru/id/65619fbf654b6f493ab7a500 |
| Created | 12 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lady_etiquette |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
111,000 average views per post against 120,998 subscribers — an engagement rate of 92.1%. Across the 2,426 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,015–316,163 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.33% and 21.2%, with a median of 9.96%.
| Window | 30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,336,700 |
| Mature posts only | 92.1% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 120,998 measured 18 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:rus · 2,426 channels · p10 2.00% · p25 4.33% · p50 9.96% · p75 21.2% · p90 36.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.629th percentile · 9.2× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.244% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:02 | 120,998 | -243 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 121,241 | +3,339 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 117,902 | -1,151 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 119,053 | +2,433 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 116,620 | -7,577 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 124,197 | +14,807 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 109,390 | -16,887 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:06 | 126,277 | -228 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 126,505 | -222 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 126,727 | -204 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 126,931 | +4,717 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 122,214 | -256 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 122,470 | -302 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 122,772 | -75 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 122,847 | -1,893 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 124,740 | +4,566 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 120,174 | -485 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 120,659 | -407 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 121,066 | -4,034 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 125,100 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (25 June 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,336,700 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 21:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwFU5a3 | 1 | 10 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqVJ1LWVjyGCkCUexTdiDh6WqbYhPeytH8PYRF | 1 | 7 July 2026 | 7 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 19 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
На 15-летии White Rabbit гуляла, кажется, вся светская Москва. У четы Зарьковых - праздник, у Владимира Мухина - гастрономическая магия, у гостей — дресс-код «космос». Масштаб вечера вполне ему соответствовал 🪐 Я тоже старалась соответствовать. Правда, на подготовку у меня было всего несколько часов между возвращением с форума в Екатеринбурге и отлётом на месяц в Париж. Так что мой выход в открытый космос проходил па…
Осень — моё любимое время для экспериментов с одеждой. Обожаю многослойность: рубашка, джемпер, а ещё один — на плечи. Вроде простой приём, а как стильно смотрится) Французы любят накидывать свитер даже поверх тренча. Удобно с этой переменчивой погодой: потеплело — сняли, похолодало — надели под тренч. Берите на заметку. В Gloria Jeans сейчас много всего для таких образов: уютные джемперы, джинсы, брюки, юбки под з…
В Екатеринбург надо ехать голодными)) Сохраняйте мою гастрокарту города. Уральские пельмени - отдельная любовь. Я умею лепить их даже с закрытыми глазами. Помню, зимними вечерами мы с бабушкой делали их целыми досками: я раскатывала сочни, она добавляла начинку. Потом выносили в сени - за окном минус тридцать, замерзало всё моментально. Люблю со сливочным маслом и сметаной. И никакие деликатесы эту любовь не отменя…
191 страна, 10 000 молодых людей - представляете, сколько здесь идей, амбиций и историй? Я на Международном фестивале молодёжи, который впервые проходит в Екатеринбурге, столице Урала. Для меня это родная земля, поэтому всё происходящее здесь воспринимаю с особым трепетом. Очень приятно, что организаторы пригласили меня как журналиста освещать такое грандиозное событие. Вокруг звучат разные языки, люди знакомятся, …
В Екатеринбурге я впервые побывала в Храме на Крови. И до сих пор не могу отпустить то, что почувствовала. Здесь стоял дом Ипатьева, где расстреляли царскую семью. История Романовых со мной с детства. Я много читала о них, изучала архивные документы, подробности их быта. Мне было интересно всё: как они жили, любили, растили детей, о чём переживали. За эти годы они стали для меня удивительно близкими. Почти родными.…
Батюшка Урал, встречай свою! Я сейчас в Екатеринбурге - приехала по приглашению организаторов Международного фестиваля молодежи. Здесь участники из разных стран, знакомлюсь, общаюсь, столько всего хочется рассказать! Но сначала немного о самом городе. Я ведь родилась на Урале, в Курганской области. Поэтому приехать сюда для меня - это всегда что-то большее, чем просто очередная командировка. Родная земля. Даже сами…
Пересматривала сейчас фотографии с открытия Ava Bistro и обратила внимание, какой у меня напряжённый лоб. Кажется, он переживает за всё, даже когда я спокойна 😂 Покажу вам этот кадр. У меня очень активная мимика, а подкожного жира мало - весь рельеф видно. Поэтому ботокс full face - это моё всё. Люблю, когда после процедуры мышцы расслабляются, мимические морщины смягчаются и лицо выглядит спокойнее. В Cosmos за по…
А мы уже делимся хроникой с открытия Grand Ava Bistro. Кстати, заодно здесь и отметили пятилетие Ava Team, так что масштаб грандиозный 🤍 Гостей встречали Антон и Елена Пинские. Приглашенные беседовали и фотографировались на улице, наслаждались блюдами на первых двух этажах, а потом переместились на веранду, где выступил хэдлайнер вечера — группа Uma2rman Среди гостей мероприятия: Анна Седокова, Александра Ревенко, …
Любите ли вы конную эстетику так, как люблю её я? В моей голове это всегда немного Ralph Lauren, немного Slim Aarons и Bruce Weber: поло, скачки, жокейские сапоги, благородные лошади - и та самая quiet luxury задолго до того, как у неё появилось название. К слову, никогда не могу пройти мимо бутика Ralph Lauren на Сен-Жермен в Париже: всегда любуюсь и беру чашку flat white в соседней кофейне. В общем, наверное, так…
У меня нет офиса в привычном понимании — мой рабочий день может начаться на съёмке, продолжиться на встрече и закончиться где-нибудь на мероприятии. Но я понимаю, что не все такие вольные слушатели, как я)) Поэтому вот вам несколько классных идей для офиса. Тем более что офискор — один из главных трендов этой осени. Жакеты, строгие брюки, рубашки и жилеты теперь носим не только на работу, но и в обычной жизни — с дж…
Распаковала коллекцию помад и карандашей M·A·C Lustreglass, которую уже можно найти в «Золотом Яблоке», и примерила на себе разные оттенки. В коллекции расширенных оттенков Lustreglass бренд объединил полупрозрачный цвет, зеркальный глянец, ухаживающие компоненты и стойкие формулы. Оттенки можно наслаивать, меняя интенсивность от едва заметной до более насыщенной, а гелевые карандаши идеально сочетаются с помадами, …
Кажется, мне не хватит всего Telegram, чтобы выгрузить сюда все фото и видео со вчерашнего мероприятия, которое на ВДНХ устроила моя подруга Катя Земская (Бедная богатая девочка). Это был «Несветский турнир» по паделу. Поэтому ловите вот такую галерею. Сама я в падел не играю, но очень профессионально мимикрирую под любое спортивное или светское мероприятие. Особенно если там настоящее французское шампанское (хотя м…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Lady_etiquette. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tatoshe4ka•Life•Style” (@Lady_etiquette), 120,998 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lady_etiquette.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.