Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Доктор Сапият

Channel

Доктор Сапият

@sunxsteel

Has discussion group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,591subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372131931
TypeChannel
Username@sunxsteel
DescriptionПишу о первопричинах болезней то, что вы не найдете в интернете Консультации, вопросы: @dr_sapiiat Курсы: sunxsteel.ru Основные статьи: @sunxsteel_bot Реклама: @Ssoffya20 Другие предложения: @sunxsteelbot @sunxsteel Уведомление 015743
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sunxsteel

Growth

26,59126,66526,6286 August 2026 — 26,654 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,665 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,649 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,646 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,642 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,631 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,631 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,625 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,608 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,591 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,580–26,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:2826,591-17
16 Aug 2026, 14:3826,608-17
15 Aug 2026, 01:1626,625-6
14 Aug 2026, 20:0226,631no change
13 Aug 2026, 15:4826,631-11
12 Aug 2026, 12:0726,642-4
11 Aug 2026, 12:2426,646-3
10 Aug 2026, 12:0626,649-2
9 Aug 2026, 15:3226,651-14
7 Aug 2026, 10:1426,665+11
6 Aug 2026, 23:5926,654first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.23%
avg views ÷ 26,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,920
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total36,549
Reactions total682
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,910
Videos
180
Links
994

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

682 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40158.8%
❤‍🔥13820.2%
🔥537.77%
🙏466.74%
💯273.96%
👏50.733%
🤝30.44%
👌20.293%
🤔20.293%
💔10.147%
💘10.147%
😱10.147%
🤬10.147%
🥰10.147%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 682reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sunxsteel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC659 views9 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Рубрика: «Важное месяца» Как давно делали УЗИ молочных желез и/или кому 35+ маммографию? Зачем делать? ⬇️ УЗИ молочных желез или маммография нужны, чтобы если изменения появятся, обнаружить их как можно раньше Большинство заболеваний молочных желез на ранних стадиях никак себя не проявляют: нет боли, нет уплотнений, человек чувствует себя абсолютно здоровым Если образование обнаруживают небольшого размера, лечени

6🔥2❤‍🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,440 views15 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Болит живот от железа, а ферритин за полгода вырос с 8 до 12. И вот это уже повод разбираться, что происходит. Недавно на консультации разбирали такую историю: пациентка полгода принимает препараты железа, после таблеток появляется тяжесть в животе, периодически вздутие, ферритин за всё это время поднялся с 8 до 12 и дальше просто встал. С таблетированным железом вообще интересная история, потому что всасывается то

14❤‍🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,700 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Какие анализы сдать и как сделать это выгодно? Список базовых анализов «по Доктору Сапият»: 1. Клинический анализ крови с лейкоформулой и СОЭ 2. Ферритин (должен быть выше 35 нг/мл) 3. Витамин В9 и Витамин В12 4. Общий белок 5. ТТГ, Т4 свободный и АТ к ТПО 6. Глюкоза 7. АЛТ, АСТ 8. Липидограмма 9. Витамин Д по возможности +те анализы, в которых ранее были изменения Можно больше не откладывать поход в лабораторию

12❤‍🔥3🙏3🔥1🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,660 views15 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Voice message

Почему не работает лечение анемии / гипотериоза / запоры? Ко мне приходят пациенты каждый день и каждый день я слышу запросы, что они годами не могут вылечить свои проблемы со здоровьем стандартными протоколами. Записала для вас подкаст о взаимосвязи состояний в организме и цепочки проблем, которые цепляются друг за друга и потом мучаются с ними много лет. Пока не придут ко мне)) или к другому компетентному врачу с

13❤‍🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 18 August 2026

Здравствуйте, подскажите пожалуйста, какие анализы нужно сдать для определения анемии (дефицита железа)?

12 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,720 views18 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Какие анализы сдать, чтобы проверить железо и анемию? Тут я бы сразу разделила два состояния, которые путают: дефицит железа и железодефицитную анемию 1) Дефицит железа может существовать довольно долго при нормальном гемоглобине (но это уже можно лечить): тут запасы железа уже истощаются, ферритин снижается, могут появляться жалобы, слабость, выпадение волос, снижение работоспособности (но в общем анализе крови ещ

14🔥3❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,660 views46 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Поднять ферритин с 23 до 52 с железом от Доктора Сапият ✅ Заказать тут: ссылка

❤‍🔥27🔥126🤬1

10 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC≈1,990 views56 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Геморрой, глисты, железо, или дайджест последней недели Сделала для вам удобную навигацию по постам последних дней: • синдром раздраженного кишечника • стул раз в 3-4 дня • чек-лист «здоровое и свежее дыхание» • паразиты • как понять, нужно ли обследоваться на паразитов? Видео от меня • жкт и нервная система • железо и жкт — всегда ли связаны? • синдром раздраженного кишечника • боли в желудке из-за гастрита? • стре

38🔥9❤‍🔥4🤝3💯2

9 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈2,190 views86 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Давайте про геморрой сегодня, потому что тема настолько массовая, насколько же люди упорно делают вид, что никакой жопы у них в организме вообще не предусмотрено)) Сначала появилась кровь на бумаге, потом периодически стало больно ходить в туалет, что то начало зудеть или выпадать после дефекации.. ну, неудобно как то врачу про такое рассказывать, поэтому человек покупает свечи по совету фармацевта, неделю ими польз

59💯14🙏7❤‍🔥5🤔1

8 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈2,120 views44 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Наверное мало кто знает, но примерно с 15 до 22 лет я была веганом и именно в этот период я очень сильно мучилась с запорами и в целом болями в животе Тогда мне казалось, что это просто особенность моего организма, что у кого-то стул каждый день, а у меня вот так раз в несколько дней и очень плотный, и ничего страшного в этом нет, просто нужно потерпеть На тот момент я ещё не знала, что у меня есть проблемы с желчны

19🔥16❤‍🔥9

6 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,300 views79 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Мне кажется, стресс до сих пор очень сильно недооценивают. Почему то многие представляют его только как увольнение или смерть близкого человека, хотя нервная система реагирует и на более «мягкие» изменения не менее агрессивро Для неё стрессом может быть: 1) Жизнь с человеком, рядом с которым постоянно приходится себя сдерживать 2) Работа, на которую не хочется идти уже несколько месяцев 3) Недосып 4) Хроническая бо

54❤‍🔥11💯9🙏3💔1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,250 views35 reactions2 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, кто приобрел моё железо Я знаю, что с момента покупки прошло немного времени и вы ещё только начали приём, но мне сейчас очень важна ваша обратная связь Если вы уже получили железо, напишите, пожалуйста, комментарий/отзыв на Озон. Понятно, что без оценки эффекта, а просто по первым ощущениям: как выглядит банка, удобно ли открывается крышка, комфортный ли размер капсулы, легко ли принимать Комментарии помо

26❤‍🔥6👌2🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sunxsteel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 554,415 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Гинеколог Дмитрий Лубнин
@dmitrylubnin · 92,229
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Сапият” (@sunxsteel), 26,591 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunxsteel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.