DSD de Luxe 3.4.2 Crexepil de Luxe Classic Лосьон Крексепил Де Люкс Заканчиваю вторую бутылочку, а пост еще не писала, непорядок🤓 От производителя: лосьон для ухода при выпадении и истончении волос. Формула направлена на стимуляцию роста волос, поддержку их активной фазы роста и улучшение плотности тонких, ослабленных волос. КЕГАБА — ключевой активный компонент и стимулятор роста в формуле лосьона. Компонент помога…

Channel
Уходом единым
@uhodom_edinym
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
62,931subscribers
-414 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001264917435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uhodom_edinym |
| Description | Автор Юлия Носевич Сотрудничество @rootsmedia Instagram (запрещен в РФ): https://instagram.com/uhodom_edinym YouTube: https://youtube.com/@uhodom_edinym Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3FZ4YR |
| Created | 29 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uhodom_edinym |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 62,931 | +202 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 62,729 | -21 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 62,750 | -19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 62,769 | -12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 62,781 | -50 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 62,831 | -58 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:15 | 62,889 | +23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 62,866 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:13 | 62,881 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:13 | 62,890 | -27 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 62,917 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 62,934 | -20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 62,954 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 62,960 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 62,965 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 63,001 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 63,010 | -30 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 63,040 | -52 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 63,092 | -26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 63,118 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.2%
- avg views ÷ 62,931 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10,200
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (15 July 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 214,550 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,980
- Videos
- ≈243
- Links
- ≈703
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8m 43s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.13%
- 1 of 47 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 10,200
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 10,200
- over 46 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Ranymhbgy9 | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
«Стайлинг от пушистости не работает при влажной погоде»❌ Разбираю очень популярное заблуждение на тему разглаживающих стайлингов! Я решила провести эксперимент. Я нанесла свой любимый стайлинг-спрей Color WOW на всю голову и разделила волосы на две части, уложив их по-разному — левую сторону на термобраш ghd, правую на фен-щетку стайлера Dyson. В результате эксперимента часть, уложенная на фен-щетку запушилась, а ча…
Video, posted without a caption
Мне понравилось подводить бьюти-итоги месяца, рассказывая о новых открытиях и наиболее часто используемых продуктах, решила эту славную традицию не прерывать! La Roche-Posay Effaclar DUO+M Мультифункциональные патчи с гидроколоидной технологией для проблемной кожи, склонной к акне. Находка сентября — мои первые патчи от высыпаний! Все подруги мне говорили, что они работают, но я не предполагала, что настолько круто.…
Marini SkinSolutions Bioclear Face Lotion Многофункциональная корректирующая сыворотка с комплексом кислот Спустя три пустые банки моего любимого кислотного крема Bioclear — сейчас у меня в ходу четвертая — я решила включить в рутину еще и сыворотку из этой серии. От производителя: сильнодействующая корректирующая формула для устранения множества проблем с кожей, включая мелкие и глубокие морщины, гиперпигментацию,…
Photo, posted without a caption
Я решила продолжить тему влажности, ответив на самые часто задаваемые вопросы! — Чем плохи фен-щетки? Фен-щетки для укладки кудрявых и пушистых волос я не рекомендую и сейчас объясню, почему. Фен-щетка — это бытовой инструмент, который якобы создан для того, чтобы упростить нам жизнь, но на самом деле он оказывает медвежью услугу. Фен-щетки работают потоком воздуха, и он идет изнутри на 360 градусов, что усложняет …
Мои кудрявые и пушистые волосы не боятся влажности, и это не магия, а опыт🤪 Поделюсь с вами им! Первое — я хорошо знаю свой тип волос. У пористого волоса рыхлые чешуйки, поэтому он начинает набухать и пушиться. Наша задача — не просто высушить волосы, а максимально разгладить их поверхность, тогда влага «не просочится» и ничего не распушит. Второе — я всегда использую разглаживающий стайлинг. Он помогает подготовит…
Video, posted without a caption
Victoria Beckham FeatherFix Brow Gel Гель для бровей в оттенке Light Brunette Не успокоюсь, пока не расскажу вам о всех позициях бренда Victoria Beckham, прописавшихся в моей косметичке😄 Если бы мне надо было вдруг сузить свою косметичку до четырех продуктов, то это однозначно были бы тон, румяна, гель для бровей и карандаш для губ. Оформление бровей для меня однозначно один из самых важных этапов макияжа, и логичн…
Мой актуальный топ среди тональных основ: — Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation; — IT Cosmetics CC+ Cream Full Coverage Color Correcting Foundation; — Victoria Beckham by Augustinus Bader The Foundation Drops with TFC8. Ссылки на подробные посты прикрепила! #hauslabs #itcosmetics #victoriabeckham
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @uhodom_edinym. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bogdanovich_elena · 118,358
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@irinameyk · 132,968
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
@ByCosmetist · 19,284
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 October 2026
@katrin_rul · 35,873
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 27 September 2026
@facebbos · 20,655
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
@hirecomend · 19,524
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 October 2026
@julyabaybeauty · 28,050
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
@koshechkiklub · 26,734
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
@bigbeautyboss · 88,502
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@aidaprodom · 313,589
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
@piletskayabeauty · 96,637
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@koffkamk · 24,768
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
@jeni_vosk · 19,813
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 September 2026
@abramovskayada · 29,005
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
@sunxsteel · 26,237
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
@byeva · 26,538
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
@klyukinad · 26,837
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
@vizoviy · 26,801
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
@spivakkatyaa · 28,739
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
@anastasiia_kuzhovnik · 24,910
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
@Beauty_AD · 26,046
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Уходом единым” (@uhodom_edinym), 62,931 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uhodom_edinym.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.