Channel
@brigadapoyasnila
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
51subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002157808497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brigadapoyasnila |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 27 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brigadapoyasnila |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 51 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 52 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 53 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 53 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 27 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
35 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10 | 28.6% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 20.0% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2024 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Значит, поясняем. Додобоня, Панч, а раннее кот Твикс, кот Виктор и еще десятки громких случаев, от которых до сих пор отходят Аэрофлот, РЖД и другие крупные бренды...разве еще непонятно, что люди к животным стали относиться в разы лучше чем к людям? Поясняем - давно понятно! Разве бренду, чтобы стать pet-friendly нужно было ждать повода? Что же это за бренд, который стал pet-friendly только из-за скандала? Pet-friend…
🤝3✍2🤨2
🤬Про провалы в маркетинге Последние две недели в маркетинговом сообществе обсуждают ребрендинг Jaguar. Легендарная марка практически полностью отказалась от основ своей айдентики (включая логотип ягуара, украшавший решетку авто, наделяя ее узнаваемым характером). А вместе с айдентикой — от многих основ бренда. Пожалуй, этот ребрендинг станет одним из самых комментируемых в 2024. Марка известная своей харизмой (вспо…
🔥1
Надо объяснить. Tropicana просто проклята, вот и все. Она из тех брендов, которые «просто не трогайте». Их немного: gap, wd-40, ну еще немного
Все можно объяснить, особенно в социологии 🤗
Общественное мнение поставили под сомнение. Социологи и политологи пожаловались на недоверие респондентов. Почти 70% россиян говорят, что доверяют результатам социологических опросов, сообщил в четверг гендиректор ВЦИОМа Валерий Федоров в ходе экспертной дискуссии, приуроченной к Дню социолога. Но довольствоваться этими цифрами, как выяснилось на мероприятии, готовы не все исследователи: некоторые из них не уверены, …
Поясняем. Это плагиат. Оригинал в комментах
Немного неожиданных фактов от уральских мебельных социологов.
😁5
https://amp.rbc.ru/rbcnews/technology_and_media/29/10/2024/671fd2389a794726b01d3af3
Можем пояснить. Ставь огонечек.
🔥9😁2🌚1
Поясняем: Awareness — не метрика бренда Не существует смм-стратегии, комстратегии, диджитл стратегии. Есть только стратегия бренда Инсайта не существует Brand is not your friend Личного бренда не существует Бренд-стратег — не профессия Лого это бренд. Но, бренд это не лого В мире нет ни одного IT-бренда. Есть продукты с логотипами и cvp Brand health не замеряет здоровье бренда. Данное исследование вообще не имеет отн…
😐3✍1❤1👾1💯1
поясняем. телеграм прилег.
✍1
Тут надо пояснить. Сегодня лигочемпионский день, и играет клуб Слован с уникальным брендингом на футболках. Где еще вы можете увидеть Nike на униформе adidas? Однако, все просто — Nike это словакский бренд беттинг-конторы 🤷🏻♂️
🌚1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @brigadapoyasnila. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@brigadapoyasnila named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пояснительная бригада” (@brigadapoyasnila), 51 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brigadapoyasnila.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.