Медиапортал в маркетинг, рекламу и диджитал.
Сотрудничество: @alfapolo
Помощник: @Alivian
Работаем с @Spiral_Yuri
Ссылка на канал: https://t.me/+U1l6hokc8ko4YWM6
РКН: clck.ru/3Ga5Rp
Created
30 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Recorded in 2019 as “Цыгане диджитал” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -171. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,704–42,927 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:44
42,730
-29
11 Aug 2026, 11:54
42,759
-19
10 Aug 2026, 12:35
42,778
-24
9 Aug 2026, 16:03
42,802
-23
8 Aug 2026, 19:32
42,825
-26
7 Aug 2026, 18:19
42,851
-29
6 Aug 2026, 21:50
42,880
-21
6 Aug 2026, 01:48
42,901
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:25
42,901
first reading
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.07%
avg views ÷ 42,730 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,740
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
64 (4 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
111,245
Reactions total
1,470
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,720
Videos
≈2,130
Links
≈1,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 01s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,179 reactions across 52 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
376
31.9%
❤
302
25.6%
🔥
255
21.6%
🗿
176
14.9%
👍
43
3.65%
👏
27
2.29%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,470reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Внутренний ИИ Google отсеивает резюме сильных кандидатов прямо в корзину: компания сама предупреждает соискателей, что корпоративная система с «ненулевой вероятностью» может ошибочно забраковать CV или слишком долго не показывать его нужным людям.
Поэтому кандидатам нужно идти в обход системы — заполнять дополнительную форму, чтобы их портфолио гарантировано попало в руки человека.
Самое ироничное, что Google парал…
Duolingo продлил 10-летнему мальчику ударный режим, который он нарушил из-за госпитализации.
Мама ребёнка рассказала о ситуации в Твиттере и попросила о «магии Duo». В ветку вмешалась зелёная сова, узнала логин юного юзера и восстановила стрик.
История быстро завирусилась на 6 млн просмотров, после чего посыпались просьбы других пользователей смилостивиться и над ними. Но тут эмпатия совы уже закончилась.
Работяги готовы отдать часть своей зарплаты, лишь бы их не лишили работы.
Истории про бег по карьерной лестнице и огромные доходы окончательно перестали вдохновлять сотрудников, уставших от пугающих новостей про сокращения и кризис на рынке труда. Зато ролики про то, как юзеры по полгода сидят без работы, неплохо мотивируют людей цепляться за свои рабочие места.
В итоге статистика показывает, что клерки готовы поже…
ChatGPT любит сплетничать, а Gemini нравится подкинуть мрачных сюжетов: исследователи продолжает изучать различия текстов, созданных нейронками, и человеческих рукописей.
Оказалось, что помимо известных пунктуационных приколов, у разных ИИ — разные стили повествования.
В TikTok снимают среднячки, а в Instagram* — высокоранговые богачи: исследование CreatorIQ показало, куда нужно идти за рекламой по низким ценам.
TikTok стал главной площадкой для креаторов среднего уровня — здесь проще набрать аудиторию и получить первые рекламные контракты. А вот среди тех, кто зарабатывает больше $250 тысяч в год, уже лидирует Instagram*: туда уходит 60% самых высокооплачиваемых авторов против 30…
Разные мечты об увольнении говорят многое о вашем состоянии: психолог пояснил, чего вы на самом деле хотите, когда грезите о жизни в деревне и пассивном доходе.
В Spotify можно будет помечать ИИ-исполнителей как «AI Persona» — плашка появится если в использовании нейронок либо признается сам автор, либо за него это сделает платформа.
При этом для таких исполнителей закроют главный бесплатный способ продвижения: их треки по умолчанию не будут попадать в персональные и редакционные рекомендации Spotify.
👍20❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @tzigan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 172,537 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Беспощадный диджитал” (@tzigan), 42,730 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tzigan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.