То, что не увидеть по телеку.
Реклама, мероприятия и проекты @nagutcheff или @SvetaKolesnikova
Амбассадор @fonbet_official
№ 4949635703
Чат канала https://t.me/+0d7EiL8pJ2dkN2Qy
Created
15 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Он Эйр” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +764. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,722–48,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 02:18
48,664
+4
8 Nov 2026, 15:10
48,660
-15
7 Nov 2026, 09:09
48,675
-12
6 Nov 2026, 10:35
48,687
+1
5 Nov 2026, 07:54
48,686
+23
4 Nov 2026, 08:47
48,663
+11
3 Nov 2026, 12:08
48,652
+8
2 Nov 2026, 13:21
48,644
-16
1 Nov 2026, 10:46
48,660
-33
31 Oct 2026, 12:16
48,693
+7
29 Oct 2026, 11:50
48,686
+30
28 Oct 2026, 11:37
48,656
+1
27 Oct 2026, 09:29
48,655
+156
25 Oct 2026, 13:10
48,499
-13
24 Oct 2026, 11:38
48,512
+15
23 Oct 2026, 14:27
48,497
+52
22 Oct 2026, 14:01
48,445
+2
21 Oct 2026, 08:34
48,443
+12
20 Oct 2026, 07:30
48,431
-6
19 Oct 2026, 06:58
48,437
first reading
Engagement
419 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.7%
avg views ÷ 48,664 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,000
143 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
144
of 419 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
419 (31 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
1,721,090
Reactions total
36,065
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,520
Videos
≈1,750
Links
≈2,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
48m 58s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 87 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
95,445 reactions across 411 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
30,802
32.3%
❤
23,408
24.5%
😁
11,418
12.0%
🔥
8,356
8.75%
👍
5,434
5.69%
❤🔥
3,957
4.15%
💯
1,347
1.41%
🤡
1,254
1.31%
💔
1,228
1.29%
💩
1,198
1.26%
👏
1,124
1.18%
🍌
760
0.796%
👎
725
0.76%
🤮
725
0.76%
🖕
680
0.712%
⚡
482
0.505%
custom 5242677754285006000
410
0.43%
🆒
410
0.43%
🥰
348
0.365%
🤯
325
0.341%
8 further kinds
1,054
1.10%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 415 of the 419 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95,972 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 419 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
35
of 415 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @offearth. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 419 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.239%
1 of 419 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
8,490
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
11,500
over 414 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwS8Dph
1
24 October 2026
24 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 419 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 44 of 144 posts held from the last 30 days (30.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🙄 Те, кто погружен в лор квизов от Алексея Гасилина, знают, как легко можно проиграть триста штук из-за того, что не знал расстояние от Земли до Луны.
На этот раз наше дерби с Моссом разразилось контурными картами и драконом на эмблеме футбольного клуба!
Зырим тут:
📱 СМОТРЕТЬ ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС
📱 СМОТРЕТЬ ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС
Чемпион мира по байкам Владислав Радимов как-то давно тренировал свой Зенит-2 против Тамбова самого Андрея Талалаева. Андрюша и Владюша зарубились в ФНЛ так, что аж сыграли 3:3.
В первом тайме Зенит еще не шарил за футбол, уступал 0:2, и поэтому участникам соревнования из Санкт-Петербурга надо было срочно рассказать, как в это играть.
Владислав Николаевич зашел в напуганную раздевалку и говорит:
- Ребята, это мяч!…
Вам плевать, что не состоялось дерби Витесс - Де Графсхаап во второй лиге Нидерландов, но все равно изучите прецедент. Да, у нас такое невозможно. У нас фанаты больше не ходят на матчи. Жаль, такой контент пропадает.
Итак, полиция и муниципалитет города Арнема (Витесс оттуда) принял решение оставить гостевую трибуну пустой и фаны Де Граафсхапа организовали немыслимый ответ: они просто заблокировали автобус со своими…
Я впервые сыграю за сборную России, поэтому сделал для себя памятное нанесение.
Еще я впервые побываю в Узбекистане. Ташкент, молю, пусть будет аншлаг, ну пожалуйста 🇺🇿
Этот скромный гол забил Стефано Боргоново 12 декабря 1985 года, за полгода до моего рождения. Если что, мне сорок лет, а на видео - последняя победа Комо над Интером во всех турнирах.
Боргоново боролся с тяжелейшей болезнью и умер в 2013 году. Но этот гол на берегах озера никогда не будет забыт.
Уважаемый Николай Борисович Картозия, продюсер и режиссер, на днях проклял всех, кто говорит слово «кушать», потому что слово это – мерзкое, лакейское и сюсюкающее, а русскообразованный человек должен «есть», как и объяснял студенту Картозии на журфаке Михаил Абрамович Штудинер, который любимый ученик Дитмара Эльяшевича Р.
Я хотел было ответить Николаю Борисовичу, что это хрень полная, миф, рожденный, видимо, в посл…
🇪🇸🇪🇸 Обычно Валенсия и Реал играют 2:2, даже если одни как обычно ни о чем, а другие только иногда.
Но! Я знаю, что вы любите сексуальные ставки, и одну из них я вынес на фото, а три других предлагаю вам, исходя из самых популярных результатов в матчах Валенсия - Реал в XXI веке.
1:1 за 12,0
Самая частая победа Реала 2:1 за 9,50
И счет 2:2 за 23 встречался аж 6 раз, как и 1:1, кстати. Выбирайте)
И забирайте бонус …
Дважды защитники ЦСКА зажгли свечу и дважды пропустили.
Не знаешь куда деть мяч, выбей в аут. Эх, старые истины как будто всё ещё лучше работают всех модных штук)
❤102👍53💯20🤯6🌭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 419 posts we hold for @offearth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@offearth edited 20 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 419 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 58 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@offearth named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ostritskiifootball named in 1 post, 24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026 · confirmed gone 2 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Сплошняк | Дмитрий Шнякин @shhhnyakin · 38,838 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
Здесь был Тимур | Тимур Журавель @timzhur · 26,448 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 September 2026
Городницкий | Футбол, деньги, медиа @pgorodnitskiy · 51,888 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
КАКОВО?! | Отар Кушанашвили | Вся правда о шоу-бизнесе @kakovo_otar · 40,585 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
Будни Бобана @BudniBobana · 23,856 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
Футбольные обзоры на Матч ТВ @matchtv_highlights · 62,723 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Это футбол, брат! @etofootballbro · 65,802 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 August 2026
Алё, рэф! @aloref · 35,627 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 2 September 2026
Nobel @nobel_arustamyan · 39,095 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 30 August 2026
Коммент.Генич @kgenich · 52,378 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 24 August 2026
Мяч Lab | Юра Русанов @myach_lab · 58,460 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
Open the Doors | Дорский @openthedoors · 25,516 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 14 September 2026
Палач Говорит | IT, медиа, гaджеты, скидки @clickordie · 39,570 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
ВГИК @vgik_of · 37,987 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Коммент.Шоу @comment_show · 56,712 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
Витя Кравченко @vityakravchenko · 61,191 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Ноу криминалити @nocrime · 21,847 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Реальный Губер 🤘🏻 @RealGuberniev · 79,118 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Казанский Код @deniskazansky · 24,326 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
Комментач @Comment_ach · 22,809 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
«Футбольный клуб» Василия Уткина @QryaProDucktion · 63,127 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
First&Red @firstandred · 28,159 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
СРА4ТВ | SRA4TV @sra4tvofficial · 21,365 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 25 September 2026
Панк инсайд @punkinside · 39,479 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 122 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Он Эйр | Роман Нагучев” (@offearth), 48,664 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/offearth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.