Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Open the Doors | Дорский

@openthedoors

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,912subscribers

+87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001456379348
TypeChannel
Username@openthedoors
Created31 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/openthedoors

Growth

24,80524,91224,858.56 August 2026 — 24,825 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,805 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,814 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,816 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,822 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,854 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,871 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,844 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,849 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,912 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,789–24,928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:1624,912+63
13 Aug 2026, 12:3624,849+5
12 Aug 2026, 12:5824,844-27
11 Aug 2026, 12:4624,871+17
10 Aug 2026, 12:2624,854+32
9 Aug 2026, 12:5124,822+6
8 Aug 2026, 11:2524,816+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:2524,814+9
6 Aug 2026, 15:1224,805-20
6 Aug 2026, 04:3224,825first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.7%
avg views ÷ 24,912 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,900
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held55 (1 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total653,740
Reactions total9,066
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8,776 reactions across 53 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,29126.1%
👍1,68419.2%
1,55317.7%
🔥7168.16%
🤣7078.06%
💯6867.82%
🤡4324.92%
💩1221.39%
👏1091.24%
😐931.06%
🤮810.923%
❤‍🔥730.832%
💊580.661%
👎280.319%
🙈220.251%
🤔210.239%
🥱160.182%
🤯140.16%
👌120.137%
😢90.103%
14 further kinds490.558%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,066reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈3,040 views48 reactionsread 14 August 2026

А помните, когда-то говорили о сэйвах пенальти в РПЛ не в контексте Стаса Агкацева? @openthedoors

34😁9👍5

14 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈3,220 views37 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Касаджиков – новая звезда «Оренбурга», но нужно говорить и о Татаеве (два раза подряд выиграл верх после аутов), и о Назаренко (прекрасные вбросы аутов, очень техничное обращение с мячом и пятка на Касаджикова на атаку с пенальти). @openthedoors

25👏8😁4

14 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈5,430 views153 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Я фанат спортивного директора «Факела», который второй тур подряд сидит экспертом в студии «Матч Премьер» на матче «Локомотива». Абсолютно внезапно ни в одном из этих матчей «Локомотив» не играл против «Факела». @openthedoors

😁138🤡732🔥2👍1

14 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈7,390 views75 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Дмитрий Рыбчинский случайно стал победителем оренбургского полумарафона пока оббегал Морозова, Ненахова, Еремеева и Ракова в штрафной «Локо». @openthedoors

😁6112🤡2

14 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈5,640 views54 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Как выяснилось, еще и российский Пирло.

36🔥18

14 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈12,500 views88 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Дамы и господа, Евгений Морозов – российский Клод Макелеле и Родри в одном лице. @openthedoors

😁7315

14 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈7,450 views57 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Галактионов, судя по всему, идет на радикальный шаг, переводя «Локомотив» на трех центральных защитников: Ньямси, Морозова и Джикию. Пара латералей Сильянов – Ненахов выглядит как мечта Антонио Конте, а очередной запас Лукаса Веры и Александра Коваленко уже даже не удивляет, несмотря на отсутствие Артема Карпукаса и неудачную игру Ильи Еремеева в первом тайме с «Акроном». У «Оренбурга» в старте нет ни Голыбина, ни

39🤣10🤯5👍2💩1

14 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈8,080 views89 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Что наговорили тренеры «Динамо»? Сегодня вышло интервью Сандро Шварца в «СЭ» и видео Нобеля с Роланом Гусевым. У Сандро получилось довольно много общих слов, из действительно интересного можно выделить разве что разговор про атаку (не хватает движения за спину – и это упрек больше не Тюкавину, а, видимо, фланговым нападающим), а также то, что семья Шварца на этой неделе приехала в Россию (точно важный момент для ме

65👍17🤡61

11 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC≈11,100 views234 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Возможно, я ошибаюсь, но весной 2026-го было сразу несколько признаков, что Михаил Галактионов не против перейти из «Локомотива» в ЦСКА. Если действительно было так, Галактионова можно было понять. С одной стороны, он покинул бы «Локомотив» после большого успеха (а бронза для «Локо» – супер) с прекрасными тренерскими моментами (четырехугольник в центре поля, прогресс Руденко). С другой, он, скорее всего, не ассоции

👍11749💩28🤡12💯11🔥10👎4💊2

11 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC≈11,000 views205 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Когда Артем Карпукас находится в хорошей физической форме, это отличный игрок для РПЛ, способный выходить в старте команды, борющейся за топ-3. Собственно, в прошлом сезоне было именно так. На самом старте чемпионата он закрывал недостатки Баринова в паре опорных, после прихода Пруцева на несколько месяцев превратился в единственного опорника в четырехугольнике Галактионова, а весной образовал подвижную связку с Пр

94💩62👍37🤣8💔3💊1

11 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈24,100 views114 reactionsread 14 August 2026

По телеге растекается статистика xG после трех туров: по данным Opta (именно на них ссылается, например, FotMob), «Факел» занимает 2-е место. По модели Understat дела «Факела» чуть хуже, но тоже якобы отличны – 4-е место после «Спартака», «Краснодара» и «Балтики», «Зенит» только пятый. Почему «якобы»? В реальной таблице «Факел» с нулем побед и двумя поражениями, хотя в Воронеже, где болеют фантастически, сыграли уже

57👍37🔥12😁4🤡3💊1

10 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈12,800 views108 reactionsread 14 August 2026

«Итоги» 3-го тура с Леонидом Слуцким! Суперпобеда «Краснодара» над «Спартаком», сенсационное поражение «Зенита», проблемы ЦСКА, «Локомотива» и «Динамо», а также два центральных защитника-антигероя выходных. Смотрим! https://youtu.be/FQzOKhD-Xu0?is=p4be7rINvhlyzjhq https://vkvideo.ru/video-215705595_456241923 @openthedoors

57👍34🔥12🥴4💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @openthedoors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,189 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Opta Sports
@optarussia · 12,233
7 posts
СБГ Аналитика (Зенит, сборная, тактика)
@sbganalitica · 14,704
6 posts
Это футбол, брат!
@etofootballbro · 66,750
3 posts
Крысева🐀 | Терлецкий
@kryseva · 13,397
3 posts
СПАРТАК ИНФОРМ
@spartakinfo · 20,400
3 posts
По статистике
@accordingtostatistics · 733
2 posts
Духъ и KruZheVa
@dukhandkruzheva · 14
2 posts
Панк инсайд
@punkinside · 38,555
2 posts
Блогбастер
@blogbustard · 50
1 post
Яндекс Плюс х VSporte | Медиафутбол
@datahub_mediafootball · 730
1 post
Детектор Мити Никонова
@detektor_MN · 209
1 post
⚽️ Футбольная❤️‍🔥🤍Страсть
@fcsmpassion · 1,732
1 post
Футбольный Кинотеатр
@footballmovie · 430
1 post
Комбаровщина
@graziekombarov · 13
1 post
Лисовский на связи | Заметки о футболе, медиа и жизни
@lisovsky_live · 206
1 post
ЛокоВосток
@LokoVostok · 221
1 post
Ничего Обычного
@nichego_obychnogo · 3,120
1 post
Rus Santos Aveiro
@russantosaveiro · 364
1 post
Sasha Leo | Спорт для еды
@sasha_leo1 · 93
1 post
Сплошняк | Дмитрий Шнякин
@shhhnyakin · 38,018
1 post
Вован МЯЧ Production | Грилиш philosophy
@Vovanmyach · 18,163
1 post
ВЫШЕЛ ИЗ КОМНАТЫ
@vyshelizkomnaty · 1,890
1 post
Марсельская рулетка | Арзуманян
@yamarce1rulet · 102
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Okko Спорт
@okkosport · 162,450
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов
@karpinside · 142,226
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига
@premierliga · 191,201
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
Фабрика Футбола
@mborzykin · 117,376
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
РФС | Сборная России по футболу
@teamrussia · 142,467
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Футбольный клуб «Зенит»
@fczenit · 198,587
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
МАТЧ ПРЕМЬЕР
@matchpremier · 307,456
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Open the Doors | Дорский” (@openthedoors), 24,912 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/openthedoors.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.