Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бодрость Духа

@megabodr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

9,639subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001496434669
TypeChannel
Username@megabodr
Created13 February 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/megabodr

Growth

9,6399,6749,656.56 August 2026 — 9,674 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,670 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,640 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,639 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,634–9,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:029,639-1
9 Aug 2026, 16:269,640-30
6 Aug 2026, 17:509,670-4
6 Aug 2026, 08:169,674first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 9,639 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.859%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held33 (23 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total45,869
Reactions total394
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

375 reactions across 31 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12834.1%
🔥6116.3%
👍4411.7%
👎4411.7%
😁4211.2%
💯143.73%
🤣123.20%
👏112.93%
🏆102.67%
🤝30.8%
🤪30.8%
👌20.533%
🍌10.267%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 394reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC≈2,750 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026

С недавних пор у нас спор и дискуссия с проспартаковским блогером по имени Максим. В новогодние праздники шёл обильный снегопад, я мирно спал на даче в Солнечногорске, Максим меня разбудил, подключил к конференции по зуму и принялся расспрашивать про Карседо и жизнь на Кипре. Так и познакомились. Максим, многие из вас нахваливали футбол «Спартака» от Станковича даже тогда, когда «Акрон» с «Факелом» не могли нормаль

👍24👎13💯8🔥32🍌1🏆1

11 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC≈2,990 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Деян Станкович просто стал плохим тренером. В криках и конфликтах он и сам не знает, что пытается доказать. То ли он очень хочет уйти из «Црвены Звезды», то ли его хотят оставить… Так или иначе, он распоясался до такой степени, что уже всем надоел. А тренеры поскромнее не дождутся шанса. C’est la vie.

12🔥3👎2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈3,020 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @poslemeze

Все верно, Андрей Константинович. Как же будут изумлены болельщики «Спартака» (особенно те, кто считают, что Карседо тащит «своих»), увидев, что, оказывается, справа может играть такой же Маркиньос. https://t.me/megabodr/5272 🇨🇾 подпишись после мезе

4🤣2👎1

11 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC≈2,490 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну всё, Карседо тащит из «Пафоса» любимчика или даже парочку. Это будет прорыв. Когда ты на Кипре, условно говоря, старший лейтенант, а тебя тащат в Россию в полковники. Игроки уровня ЛЧ, без вопросов, но условия будут умножены, таковы правила игры. «Спартак» — чемпион, истинно говорю, Карседо всё видит.

🔥63🤣2👎1

10 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈2,470 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вообще, история моего корпоративного футбола довольно специфична. Лет десять назад я играл с коллегами по «Локомотиву» на одном из запасных полей «РЖД Арены» — 11 на 11. Это было на скоростях и довольно изнурительно, с жёсткими зарубами и соответствующей риторикой. Сотрудник фан-шопа готов был треснуть неприятелям по башке, SMM-специалист выбил палец, ну и прочие шероховатости. И вдруг ребята с «Чемпионата» позва

5😁5👎1

10 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC≈2,150 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Очередной прикид, который не останется незамеченным. Обувь (Адидас, ФК «Локомотив») Кто выдал: администратор Станислав. Гетры: МФК «Спартак» Кто выдал: Сергей Гомберг. Трусы: ФК «Зенит» Кто выдал: Владислав Радимов. Майка: ЦСКА Кто выдал: точно не вспомню, и на ней нет фамилии. Для привлечения внимания: Глеб Чернявский (известный марафонец, вратарь, легенда Спортса). История умалчивает о том, фыркал ли Глебчик,

5😁4👎1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,740 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Болельщики «Локо» хотят задать вопросы Борису Ротенбергу. Кроме того, многие недоумевают, почему он молчит, не опровергает и т.д. Ребята, это не всегда возможно. Если дать правдивый ответ на некоторые вопросы — возможно, всем будет больно и не на пользу. Иной раз следует выждать. Если выходить с программными заявлениями, то они должны созреть и иметь некое согласование. Согласование подразумевает согласие. Очевидно

👍93💯2🔥2👎1🤣1

9 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC979 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Поспорил с легендой РБ Артемом Слицким на исход матча Спартак - Краснодар. Артём ставил на победу Спартака, и это было опрометчиво. Поэтому после матча ему пришлось ставить пиво (оплачивал премиальной карточкой и предлагал добавки). Впрочем, не всё так плохо. У меня созрел прогноз на исход чемпионата. Когда Карседо зажжёт по-настоящему. 1. Спартак 2. Зенит 3. Краснодар

6🔥4🤣2😁1

9 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,260 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @slynestalloneVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

6🔥4🤣2👎1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC≈1,450 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Готовая идея для разогрева любого домашнего матча «Локомотива», в том числе с КС. https://t.me/spasiborzd/716

🔥5💯42👎1

7 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC971 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

С Игорем Кытмановым связана, пожалуй, одна из самых смешных баек в истории РБ, но она отчасти связана с коммерческой тайной и покамест под NDA. А сегодня Игорь поразил меня высказываниями о «Динамо». Он мне объяснил, что Ролан Гусев должен был выиграть КР, и тогда бы его рассмотрели на роль ГТ. Никто ему ничем не обязан. А Шварца давно вели, всегда хотели. Поэтому он назначен давно. А то, что нет якобы игры, так это

😁4🤝32👎1

7 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,940 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

В 18:00 мск. на Матч Премьер обсудим, не следует ли назначить женщину на пост президента ФИФА. Ловчев — предварительно за.

3🤪3👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @megabodr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@megabodr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 67,771 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q106834600 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelAndrey Bodrov
DescriptionRussian journalist and media manager
X / Twitter@andrey_bodrov

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бодрость Духа” (@megabodr), 9,639 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megabodr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.