Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Коммент.Шоу

@comment_show

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

54,853subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001152616792
TypeChannel
Username@comment_show
DescriptionКоммент.Шоу в тележке 😎 Наш чат: https://t.me/commentshow_chat По всем вопросам и предложениям: @commentshow_ad Номер заявления: №4979025198 https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/679b62b3b34cfc6080d7ae39
Created18 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/comment_show

Growth

54,85354,92554,8896 August 2026 — 54,925 subscribers6 August 2026 — 54,925 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,914 subscribers8 August 2026 — 54,878 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,903 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,888 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,878 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,853 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,842–54,936 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:5354,853-25
11 Aug 2026, 10:2854,878-10
10 Aug 2026, 08:2054,888-15
9 Aug 2026, 10:5254,903+25
8 Aug 2026, 11:4454,878-36
7 Aug 2026, 09:0754,914-11
6 Aug 2026, 11:5154,925no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:4854,925first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 54,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,010
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held72 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total648,610
Reactions total10,285
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,510
Videos
4,800
Links
4,660

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 58s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,916 reactions across 59 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4,23053.4%
🔥1,16814.8%
99412.6%
💩6087.68%
👍5016.33%
custom 52536726515194488393694.66%
custom 5253776250425593958280.354%
💔130.164%
50.063%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 72 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @comment_show. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC≈1,910 views128 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Внимание! В составе угрешского Прэвью РПЛ — замена! В этот четверг вместо Генича в пару к маэстро Бубнову выскочит засаживать великий Кытманов. Без дуркований, но с небольшими виляниями обсудим матчи 4 тура РПЛ. УРА, ФУТБОЛ! Вот ссылочки: 📱 youtu.be/qPV5gyd7DCM 📱 vk.cc/d0qQgb

🔥83😁16custom 5253672651519448839157👍5💩2

12 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈3,120 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Милан, вы там это, подсоберитесь, что ли. Мэр на ковер вызывает. 🖐 ИНТЕРВЬЮ С КАЛАДЗЕ

😁31🔥84custom 52536726515194488394💩2

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈4,320 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Гамарджоба, дорогой! Доставай из шкафа старую футболку Милана, сдувай пыль с VHS-кассеты, на которой матчи записаны, — сейчас олдскулы сведет. Нобель рванул в Тбилиси, в гости к легенде грузинского футбола Кахе Каладзе. Самый стильный мэр рассказал, как поживает Хвича и какие у него шансы на ЗМ, что творится в Милане сейчас, и чем так хороша сборная Грузии. Покатались по городу на тачке, обсудили жизнь после футбола

37👍28🔥11💩8custom 52536726515194488392

12 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈5,320 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мы вот щас один выпуск на канал грузим… Из Грузии.

🔥52😁21💩106👍1

12 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈5,910 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Че, какие у тебя планы на сегодня?

😁78custom 5253672651519448839245👍1

11 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈10,100 views176 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡ БУБНОВ И КЫТМАНОВ ЗАРУБИЛИСЬ НЕПОНЯТНО, НА ЧТО!!! 🖐 КОММЕНТ.ФМ

😁151🔥147custom 52536726515194488394

11 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈8,810 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Почему Спартак проиграл? Слушай сюда, шоб ты знал: 🖐 КОММЕНТ.ФМ

😁70🔥127💩7👍2custom 525367265151944883921

11 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈8,180 views125 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А с Карпукасом и Батраковым будут бороться, чтобы всё-таки попасть в переходные? 🖐 КОММЕНТ.ФМ

😁99🔥11👍8💩42custom 52536726515194488391

11 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈7,980 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Расчехляем дневники, посетители! Маэстро оглашает ТТД WINLINE Матча Тура. 📱 youtu.be/bMW6pZVIz-U 📱 vk.cc/d0nO6P

😁407💩6🔥5👍1custom 52536726515194488391

11 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈7,720 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Братва, успейте задать вопрос нашим гениальным экспертам! Отправляйте голосовухи и кружочки вот сюда: @commentfm_bot

custom 525367265151944883930😁53👍3

11 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈8,880 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡️ HERE WE GO! Кварацхелия переходит в NBA 🖐 ИНТЕРВЬЮ С КАЛАДЗЕ

🔥71💩11😁118👍7

11 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈8,870 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Если Кривцов лучше Сперцяна, а Сперцян лучше Мусиалы, то что вообще за демон этот Кривцов? 🖐 КОММЕНТ.LIVE

😁93💩8👍64🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @comment_show. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@comment_show edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 979 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Okko Спорт
@okkosport · 161,449
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
WINLINE
@winline · 264,301
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов
@karpinside · 142,129
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
Спорт на Кинопоиске
@sportonkp · 149,181
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Чемпионат
@championat · 252,825
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Спортс“
@sportsru · 451,689
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
BETBOOM
@betboom · 151,412
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
FONBET
@fonbet_official · 252,464
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Матч ТВ
@match_tv · 677,225
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026
Футбольный клуб «Зенит»
@fczenit · 198,834
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
МАТЧ ПРЕМЬЕР
@matchpremier · 307,573
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
РФС | Сборная России по футболу
@teamrussia · 142,557
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига
@premierliga · 189,939
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
ПФК ЦСКА
@pfccskamoscow · 178,253
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
ФК «Спартак-Москва»
@fcsmtg · 270,510
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Коммент.Шоу” (@comment_show), 54,853 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comment_show.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.