💰Приветственный фрибет до 15 000₽ без депозита от первого букмекера
fkeit.ru/wbg1gxxf 👈
По вопросам использования сайта или приложения FONBET: @Fonbet_Supportbot
№ 5156178223
Created
16 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1,945. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 252,514–255,043 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 03:03
252,806
-1,550
10 Aug 2026, 23:33
254,356
+309
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
254,047
-151
8 Aug 2026, 23:30
254,198
-276
7 Aug 2026, 22:39
254,474
-257
6 Aug 2026, 21:11
254,731
-20
6 Aug 2026, 00:54
254,751
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:06
254,751
first reading
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.80%
avg views ÷ 252,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,100
105 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
105
of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
105 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
1,273,300
Reactions total
14,489
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈23,100
Videos
≈7,980
Links
≈14,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 53s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,227 reactions across 89 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,938
24.0%
👍
1,887
15.4%
😱
1,400
11.5%
😁
1,163
9.51%
👏
1,157
9.46%
🫡
712
5.82%
🤔
590
4.83%
custom 5276510719209154370
536
4.38%
🎉
495
4.05%
💯
463
3.79%
🤯
397
3.25%
custom 5449408995691341691
117
0.957%
😢
117
0.957%
🍾
97
0.793%
custom 5264737672684907396
57
0.466%
🏆
32
0.262%
😍
22
0.18%
⚡
17
0.139%
🤝
13
0.106%
😎
11
0.09%
1 further kind
6
0.049%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,489reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 105 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fonbet_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 105 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✅🏆 Немного пояснений за киберспорт:
Falcons выиграли последний TI, а ПСЖ выиграли последнюю Лигу чемпионов, дополнительно: обеими командами владеют шейхи;
Spirit = «Барселона» = кузница талантов;
1w Team, как и «Реал» — команда с яркими звездами и большими бюджетами;
BB — команда, стабильно хорошо показывающая себя на турнирах, но до постоянных титулов не дотягивают — «Арсенал» 2.0;
PVision — сочетание молодых т…
❤️⚽️ 2DROTS прошли в следующий раунд Пути регионов FONBET Кубка России
Полюткин сравнял счет на 93-й минуте матча, а потом медиакоманда оказалась сильнее в серии пенальти.
👍 — красавцы!
Подписаться на FONBET 🔝
🎁🎁🎁 К МАТЧУ СУПЕРКУБКА УЕФА!
Угадай, какой игрок забьет первый гол и в каком тайме это будет — среди всех правильно ответивших мы рандомно разыграем десять фрибетов по 10 000₽!
❗️Важно: если ты считаешь, что никто не забьет в основное время, то пиши «голов не будет».
Редактировать и удалять комментарии запрещено. Участник конкурса имеет право оставить только 1 прогноз.
🔔Свой прогноз нужно оставить до 22:00 (мск).…
🐉 Разыгрываем джерси «Рубина»
Вместе со всеми казанскими болельщиками ждем классную игру команды в этом сезоне и дарим возможность поддерживать любимый клуб в новой игровой футболке с автографами!
Подписывайся на каналы FONBET и «Рубина», жми на кнопку РУБИН и жди 22 августа, когда мы подведем итоги розыгрыша! 🎁
⚽️⭐️ ПСЖ постарается взять еще один евротрофей
▪️ Команда Сафонова уже выигрывала Суперкубок УЕФА год назад — тогда обыграли «Тоттенхэм» в серии пенальти.
▪️ Унаи Эмери трижды боролся за этот кубок, но ни разу не смог победить. Проиграл «Реалу», «Барселоне» и «Челси».
👉 Заряжай на исход матча тут: fnbt.link/592ac
❤️⚽️ 2DROTS продолжает путь в FONBET Кубке России
В прошлом матче Пути регионов медиаклуб уверенно обыграл «Орел» со счетом 2:0. Сегодня предстоит встреча с «Шумбратом» из Саранска 😍
👉 Заряжай на победу дротов в основное время: fnbt.link/9ac7c
🤦♂️🟥 Зачем он это сделал?!
Гусман из «Тигреса» прибежал к центру поля, чтобы разыграть штрафной. Зачем-то толкнул судью и получил красную.
😁 — гениально
Подписаться на FONBET 🔝
❌😱 «Монако» выгоняет Погба из-за травмы
Как пишет Nice-Matin, Поль на сборах получил травму колена. За два года в клубе он сыграл всего 115 минут. Французам это надоело — расторгнут контракт.
Эх, а ведь когда-то он выигрывал мундиаль и стоил €100 млн. Грустно 😢
🔝 Фрибет до 15 000 всем новым клиентам
⚽️🔥 Еще помнишь Наваса? Он в порядке
Бывший вратарь «Реала» и ПСЖ пылит за мексиканский «Пумас». В матче Кубка лиг с «Коламбусом» он не только тащил, но и решился пробить в серии пенальти.
Свой удар кипер забил. А вот партнеры подвели — команда Наваса вылетела.
👍 — старичок хорош!
Подписаться на FONBET 🔝
👍93😱16❤13👏8custom 52765107192091543703🍾1🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @fonbet_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fonbet_official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 266 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BETBOOM @betboom · 151,412 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
WINLINE @winline · 264,301 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
Спорт на Кинопоиске @sportonkp · 149,181 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига @premierliga · 189,689 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
ПФК ЦСКА @pfccskamoscow · 178,253 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Чемпионат @championat · 253,080 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
МАТЧ ПРЕМЬЕР @matchpremier · 307,573 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
Матч ТВ @match_tv · 677,447 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026
Okko Спорт @okkosport · 161,449 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
ФК «Спартак-Москва» @fcsmtg · 270,510 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
2DROTS @twodrotsshow · 215,761 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Футбольный клуб «Зенит» @fczenit · 198,834 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Спортс“ @sportsru · 451,969 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
МЯЧ Production @myachpro · 375,090 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
GOAL24 @GOAL24Main · 999,955 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
КХЛ @khl_official_telegram · 274,044 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
АртПо @artpo17 · 278,594 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FONBET” (@fonbet_official), 252,806 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fonbet_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
