7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95,495–95,564 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 05:48
95,556
+9
11 Aug 2026, 08:56
95,547
+14
10 Aug 2026, 06:31
95,533
+4
9 Aug 2026, 07:12
95,529
+15
8 Aug 2026, 06:48
95,514
+11
7 Aug 2026, 08:51
95,503
-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:45
95,504
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
58.7%
avg views ÷ 95,556 subscribers
Avg views / post
56,100
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
34 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
1,908,400
Reactions total
29,639
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,150
Videos
≈206
Links
≈1,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29,639 reactions across 34 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,503
25.3%
👍
5,620
19.0%
😁
5,536
18.7%
🔥
2,968
10.0%
🤯
2,436
8.22%
💔
2,388
8.06%
🤣
1,011
3.41%
💯
719
2.43%
🤪
704
2.38%
🤬
450
1.52%
❤🔥
156
0.526%
🤝
131
0.442%
💘
17
0.057%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,639reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
54
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 34 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KFNik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❤️ Теперь еврокубки – вместе с BETBOOM
BETBOOM и Okko объявили о партнёрстве: теперь трансляции еврокубков будут выходить при поддержке букмекерской компании. Почему это круто?
1️⃣ Пользователей ждут новые совместные проекты, специальные рубрики, интерактивные форматы и игровые механики, а также новый опыт просмотра Лиги чемпионов, Лиги Европы и Лиги конференций
2️⃣ Одно из главных направлений — комьюнити-касты. В…
В самолете решил дать шанс новому менеджеру. Они что пофиксили косяки,или это я изменился - но сейчас игра мне прям заходит! Взял Ньюкасл - развлекаюсь в полете!
Так вот незаметно для всех Поль Погба и закончил. Новая травма,с ним разрывают контракт.
Увы, этот грустный,но невероятно хрестоматийный и показательный пример не будет оценен. Спишут на «неудачу» ,хотя игрок с талантом планомерно сам все делал, что бы оказаться в этой точке.
Пока Атлетико катает Альвареса на эмоциональных качелях и выводит из себя, Барселона наметила новую,более реальную,цель - Мартинес из Интера.
Не оч понятно,зачем аргентинцу менять Интер где он кэп и очень влиятелен,на молодых Барсы,где его роль будет исключительно вспомогательная,но это Барса - такие команды каждый день за тобой не приходят. Да и шанс стать медийней, особенно в потенциально пост-мессивскую эпоху - те…
Сузуки переходит в ПСЖ. Наверно вот еще один из малочисленной группы «выходцев с ЧМ».
Интересно, Это что бы отпустить непотянувшего Шевалье или Энрике на фарт опять хочет голкипера поменять после победы в ЛЧ?
Японский голкипер крут. Отличная школа,рефлексы и управление обороной. И он сильнее в игре в пас. Посмотрим как будет в сезоне
Я бы на месте Барсы присмотрелся к Эванилсону из Бормута.
Ему в Англии не оч комфортно,но все равно забивает. Стилистически подойдет и можно держать в запасе когда надо. Даже с учетом наценки апл не дороже должен быть 40.
Дополняю.
Или рискнуть, поверить что травмы позади а таланту нужно перезагрузка - и долбануть 20-25 в Фергюсона. Он прям очень Фликовский малый. Да,статистика падает,а травмы растут,но там бешен…
Продать Торреса что бы купить Родри - отличный ход Барселоны!
Реал,судя по карманным журналистам, делает хорошую мину при плохой игре(привет «Джону» главе скаутов)
Арауху тоже хорошо скинули. Капитан, который не стартовый - это всегда проблемы. Теперь их нет.
Если Барса не сойдет с ума и не кинет 150+ за Альвареса,а найдет нормального форварда за 45+
А
Реал распродаст перегруз (Эндрик,Диас и Камавинга (последний …
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @KFNik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 393,677 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Реальный Футбол LIVE @rflive · 236,274 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
GOAL24 @GOAL24Main · 999,955 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
МЯЧ Production @myachpro · 374,658 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Спортс“ @sportsru · 451,689 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Official Fabrizio Romano @FabrizioRomanoTG · 379,249 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
FC BARCELONA @newsbarca · 332,354 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Real Madrid CF | Реал Мадрид @realmadridcdf · 328,682 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
BETBOOM @betboom · 151,412 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
Спорт на Кинопоиске @sportonkp · 149,181 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Okko Спорт @okkosport · 161,449 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
ND - Новости Дня @ndnews24 · 271,429 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Картавый Футбол объединяет!” (@KFNik), 95,556 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KFNik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
