Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дай ударитЬ

@daiudarit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

44,702subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001301765485
TypeChannel
Username@daiudarit
DescriptionАбсолютно всё и сразу о российском футболе: инсайды, интервью, аналитика и авторский контент. Связь строго: @PoloMarkoDU А+ Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6738fdcc340096358ba8d312&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created1 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/daiudarit

Growth

44,61744,70244,659.56 August 2026 — 44,617 subscribers6 August 2026 — 44,626 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,642 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,634 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,650 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,696 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,702 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,604–44,715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:3844,702+6
11 Aug 2026, 12:4344,696+46
10 Aug 2026, 10:4044,650-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:3244,651+17
8 Aug 2026, 13:4744,634-8
7 Aug 2026, 16:1744,642+16
6 Aug 2026, 18:2444,626+9
6 Aug 2026, 03:0644,617first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 44,702 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,600
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held51 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total948,100
Reactions total27,617
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,500
Videos
24
Links
4,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 00s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

24,714 reactions across 44 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6,60826.7%
🤣5,22921.2%
🤡4,27917.3%
2,50110.1%
🔥1,3855.60%
👎9593.88%
🤮9423.81%
💩7663.10%
💯6212.51%
👏2250.91%
🤬2070.838%
🥴2040.825%
🖕1730.7%
🤯1520.615%
🤪820.332%
🤨730.295%
👀660.267%
🙈590.239%
🏆500.202%
😢460.186%
9 further kinds870.352%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 51 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @daiudarit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈10,400 views163 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Российский клуб из Москвы предлагает «Црвене Звезде» 8 млн евро за 23-летнего голландского форварда Джей Энема. (Meridian Sport) 😉Дай УдаритЬ в MAX | Дай УдаритЬ в Telegram

🤯103🤣4310🤨4👍2🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈11,200 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mborzykinPhoto

ХВАТАЙ ДЖЕРСИ БАРКО С РОСПИСЬЮ + КРУТОЙ РЕТРО-МЕРЧ СПАРТАКА Красно-белые одни из главных претендентов на чемпионство: буки дают на это кэф 4,20. Шансы Зенита и Краснодара оценивают в 1,85 и 5,00. Погоня за золотом продолжится завтра матчем с быками Галицкого. И мы решили провести масштабный розыгрыш наимяснейших призов: • 1-й – Футболка Барко с автографом (бесценно) – ведь это сердце Спартака остается в команде до

🤡2620👍9🤮4🔥2🤨1

12 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈13,100 views353 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Скучали по Сержу Иванову? Будет на VAR в матче с «Балтикой» 😉Дай УдаритЬ в MAX | Дай УдаритЬ в Telegram

🥴192🤣62🤡46💩31🤬15👍51🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈14,000 views163 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Трансляции Еврокубков теперь будут в Okko вместе с BETBOOM: часть трансляций Лиги Чемпионов покажут на Twitch и других площадках, а комментировать их будут амбассадоры BETBOOM. С нетерпением ждём старта еврокубкового сезона.

💩8047👍28👻2🔥2🤪2🏆1👎1

11 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC≈16,600 views805 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Деяна Станковича уволили из «Црвены Звезды» после вылета из «Лиги Чемпионов», об этом сообщает «Чемпионат» 😉Дай УдаритЬ в MAX | Дай УдаритЬ в Telegram

🤣707🤯35👍2714😢12👻5😱4🤡1

11 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈22,500 views328 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Спартак» предложил Дёгтеву зарплату в 5 млн рублей Как стало известно Дай УдаритЬ для Metaratings «Спартак» предложил вратарю «Сочи» Александру Дёгтеву зарплату в размере 5 млн рублей. По нашей информации, «Спартак» предложил сочинцам за футболиста 140 млн рублей плюс 60 млн рублей бонусы. По данным «Чемпионата», «красно-белые» предложили 200 млн рублей «Сочи» за голкипера, однако клуб хочет выручить за трансфер 2

138👍115👎51😐10💩7🤯4🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈14,900 views757 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @spartakinfoPhoto

«СПАРТАК» В БЛИЖАЙШЕЕ ВРЕМЯ НАПРАВИТ ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ «ПАФОСУ» ПО ПЕРЕХОДУ ЖОАУ КОРРЕЙЯ Как стало известно телеграм-каналу Спартак Информ, в ближайшее время московский «Спартак» отправит официальное предложение о переходе вингера «Пафоса» Жоао Коррейя. Коррейя выступает за кипрский клуб с 2024 года. В минувшем сезоне вингер принял участие в 23 матчах чемпионата Кипра, в которых забил 10 голов, а также сыграл девять встр

👎584👀64👍26🤬23🤮23🤣13🤨98

11 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈16,300 views211 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @uspeipoimatPhoto

Генич заявил, что внутри ЦСКА существует конфликт: Внутри ЦСКА существует конфликт. Не знаю, общается Шевелев с Игдисамовым или нет, но и при Николиче, и при Челестини этот конфликт был прямой у спортивного блока и тренерского штаба. А Бабаев на вопрос «нравится ли вам, как играет сейчас ЦСКА», ответил: «оставляет желать лучшего» (КШ) Успей Поймать в Telegram | Успей Поймать в MAX

👍136🤣607🤡5🤪3

10 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC≈15,900 views488 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @spartakinfoPhoto

АГЕНТ ЭСЕКЬЕЛЯ БАРКО ЛЕТИТ В МОСКВУ ДЛЯ ПОДПИСАНИЯ НОВОГО КОНТРАКТА СО «СПАРТАКОМ» Агент Адриан Файха, представляющий интересы полузащитника «Спартака» Эсекьеля Барко, в эфире Лепсая Live прокомментировал ситуацию с продлением контракта игрока. После долгих месяцев переговоров мы, наконец, сильно продвинулись в этом вопросе с Эсекьелем и «Спартаком». Остались только незначительные детали. По-моему, они не должны по

👍38950👏16🔥13👎7👌4🤗32

10 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈17,900 views1,002 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Агент Дзюбы: Пара Даку-Дзюба смогла бы существенно переломить ход матча с "Краснодаром" Леонид Гольдман, представитель российского нападающего Артёма Дзюбы, в разговоре с Дай УдаритЬ для Metaratings высказался о вариантах продолжения карьеры бывшего форварда «Акрона». «Леонид, вчера Вас видели на матче "Спартак" - "Краснодар", есть ли вероятность, что Дзюба окажется в одном из этих клубов? Может быть Вы с кем-то об

🤣519🤡307🤮71🖕3227💩27👍10🥴7

10 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC≈17,800 views134 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @globalmyachPhoto

Джон Кордоба был одной из главных целей «Васку да Гама» в это трансферное окно, однако запрос «Краснодара» затрудняет достижение договорённости. Российский клуб хочет около 8 миллионов евро единовременным платежом, чтобы отпустить колумбийского нападающего. Источник: журналист Бруно Мурито Глобальный Футбол в Телеграм | Глобальный Футбол в MAX

👍90🤣33🔥54🤯2

10 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC≈19,100 views354 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Степашин заявил, что «Зенит» развратил Тюкавина: Я очень надеюсь и на Костю [Тюкавина], его, конечно, «Зенит» немножко развратил. Честно скажу, сегодня было непонятно, чем он занимался на поле. Маринкин, да, замечательно. И Окишор сегодня очень неплохо сыграл. У нас много хороших молодых игроков (КП) 😉Дай УдаритЬ в MAX | Дай УдаритЬ в Telegram

🤣297👍2315🤡11👏4🔥2👎1🤨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @daiudarit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 16,531 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФК «Спартак-Москва»
@fcsmtg · 270,510
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Чемпионат
@championat · 252,825
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
МАТЧ ПРЕМЬЕР
@matchpremier · 307,573
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига
@premierliga · 189,939
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
Спорт на Кинопоиске
@sportonkp · 149,181
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
WINLINE
@winline · 264,301
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
Okko Спорт
@okkosport · 161,449
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дай ударитЬ” (@daiudarit), 44,702 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daiudarit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.