Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 52 days, net -1,539. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,109–58,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 19:59
56,340
-260
19 Sept 2026, 14:59
56,600
-97
16 Sept 2026, 23:40
56,697
-75
15 Sept 2026, 03:20
56,772
-102
13 Sept 2026, 15:42
56,874
-117
11 Sept 2026, 21:40
56,991
-171
9 Sept 2026, 09:22
57,162
-59
6 Sept 2026, 04:40
57,221
-28
4 Sept 2026, 02:21
57,249
-25
2 Sept 2026, 19:24
57,274
-52
1 Sept 2026, 19:29
57,326
+15
31 Aug 2026, 22:36
57,311
-107
31 Aug 2026, 00:03
57,418
-27
29 Aug 2026, 20:25
57,445
+37
28 Aug 2026, 20:35
57,408
-29
27 Aug 2026, 21:14
57,437
+21
26 Aug 2026, 23:54
57,416
-36
26 Aug 2026, 02:45
57,452
-52
25 Aug 2026, 02:37
57,504
-45
23 Aug 2026, 16:48
57,549
first reading
Engagement
591 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 56,340 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,000
348 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.828%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
350
of 591 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
591 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
5,573,420
Reactions total
46,168
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 22:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,200
Videos
≈3,990
Links
≈6,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
47m 39s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 91 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
83,362 reactions across 578 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
37,531
45.0%
🤡
17,464
20.9%
😁
13,999
16.8%
🔥
6,302
7.56%
👍
3,864
4.64%
💩
2,036
2.44%
👎
1,027
1.23%
👏
406
0.487%
🙏
381
0.457%
🤯
352
0.422%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 589 of the 591 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84,277 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 591 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
8.80%
52 of 591 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
52
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
15,800
over 52 measured posts
Median views · rest
17,400
over 537 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 591 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Взял ничью
⚡️АКЦИЯ 2:0 и ФРИБЕТ до 10 000 от BetBoom⚡️
Регистрируйтесь по ссылке. Не забывайте промокод EGOROV и получайте до 10 000
❤️ АКЦИЯ 2:0 ВЕРНУЛАСЬ. Если вы ставите на Еарокубки, и ваша команда ведет с разницей в 2 мяча - ставка рассчитывается как выигрышная вне зависимости от результата!
А это мой твич: https://www.twitch.tv/edim_sport1
Я на самом деле в шоковом состоянии пребываю. Честно. Особенно по Вадику. Как я за него бился эти недели. Кто-то не знал, что перед играми в день матчей ЛФЛ запрещен. После матчей, в свободные дни разрешили. Но так.
И это за два месяца второй раз. Прошлый: не поехал играть со Спартаком, сказал галик - а видео с ЛФЛ. Я если честно просто разбит морально всем этим
Хотел бы респект ЦСКА закинуть. Много раз говорил: если бы я начинал следить за футболом, то поддерживал бы ЦСКА, а не Спартак.
Причины:
1. В клубе есть носители духа. Акинфеев. Гинер. Бабаев. Это те люди, кто давно рядом. Плюс, тот же Орешкин - фанат ЦСКА, а не тот, кому клуб кинули в нагрузку от корпорации.
2. Медиа проекты. Сериалы. Показы. Ролики. Всякие профильные матчи. В принципе, очень френдли ребята из пр…
С Перей простая история. Перед матчем с Амкалом он подошел к тренеру и сказал, что хочет попустить предыгровую, так как у него турнир у детей.
Тренер довел до меня, что предложил Диме делать выбор самому. Дима на тренировку не пришел. Вся команда пришла, а он - нет. Точно также как вся команда могла остаться -1 неделю назад.
Это недопустимо для меня. Также недопустимо слышать, что, оказывается, у нас принято пропус…
Раздаем билеты на Амкал. На фанатку! Заводящие на секторе: Шина, Саня ФИФА, Макс Синицын, Уруру, игроки.
Билеты на фанатку раздаем БЕСПЛАТНО, пишите - @babahi4
Всех ждём
27 Сентября
🕔 16:00 (в 15:15 уже у стадиона)
🏟 Cosmos Arena
👕Дресс-код - черный верх
🎫 БИЛЕТЫ
Карпину 60 лет. Почему он не продает курсы: как можно так выглядеть в возрасте?!
Волосы вьются. Подтянут. Мышечный корсет сохранен. Бежит. Курит в каждой паузе. Ест что попало. Пивко любит.
Это как?!
@edimsp
ЛЕГЕНДА ДЕРБИ №2 🔥
ЗАВОДЯЩИЕ НА «АМКАЛ»
Он забил «Амкалу» на последней минуте, а в все будет с вами на трибуне!
Шина с нами! Но мы продолжаем анонсить заводящих. ❤️ — Собираем еще 100 и показываем следующего!
🗓 27 Сентября
🕔 16:00 (в 15:15 уже у стадиона)
🏟 Cosmos Arena
👕Дресс-код - черный верх
🎫 БИЛЕТЫ
Билеты на фанатку раздаем БЕСПЛАТНО, пишите - @babahi4
Всем добренькое утро. В 11:00 Медлиасанадали дам. Вечерком постримим-посидим перед окончанием тура.
🔥38❤10💩6🤡4👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 591 posts we hold for @edimsp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@edimsp edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 591 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
T-KILLAH @tkillah · 24,033 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
НЕКЛАСИКО @neclasic0 · 96,303 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
Крысева 🐀 | Медиа футбич @KrysMF23 · 136,760 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
ДИСС НА ВСЕХ @sibskanahater · 28,267 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
ШУГАР | Медиафутбол @sugarfifa · 38,692 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
WINLINE Media League @WinlineML · 85,236 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Федос @Fedos911 · 33,672 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Галерея Джея @hijeygallery · 52,337 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
13TEAM | Медиафутбол @team1341 · 46,844 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Он Эйр | Роман Нагучев @offearth · 48,461 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 August 2026
2DROTS @twodrotsshow · 212,205 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Mavrin Coach / Василий Маврин @mavrinlive · 23,043 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Матч! Медиафутбол @match_media · 37,027 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
ФК 10 || ФК Десять || FC 10 @fc10fc10 · 25,361 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов @karpinside · 143,490 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
КАКОВО?! | Отар Кушанашвили | Вся правда о шоу-бизнесе @kakovo_otar · 40,277 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
ваш КРАП @vashkrap · 23,614 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
FONBET @fonbet_official · 247,088 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
АртПо @artpo17 · 277,322 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
FC KEFIR @Fcsm_kefir · 59,889 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Леван Горозия / L’ONE @gorozia_levan · 22,513 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
Крысиный Эдем 🐀 | forzorezor (он же forz9r) @forz9rr · 47,812 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
ОПГ Лит Энерджи ⚽️ @fclit_official · 95,815 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026
ФНЛ с Ильёвым @ilyevserg · 33,806 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 159 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дмитрий Егоров | Едим спорт | Президент Броуков” (@edimsp), 56,340 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edimsp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
