Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔴⚪️КБ ТЕЛЕГА | Никитин

@spartakoz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

56,405subscribers

+471 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001289642495
TypeChannel
Username@spartakoz
DescriptionПечатаю: о «Спартаке», РПЛ и России. Теперь еще «Спартак Шоу» и «Спорт-Экспресс». Эксклюзивный партнер @winline. По рекламе: @suprimeteam Второй канал: https://t.me/MaxHave
Created21 June 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spartakoz

Growth

55,93456,40556,169.56 August 2026 — 55,934 subscribers6 August 2026 — 55,934 subscribers7 August 2026 — 56,067 subscribers8 August 2026 — 56,324 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,364 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56,358 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,374 subscribers12 August 2026 — 56,405 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +471. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,863–56,476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:2356,405+31
11 Aug 2026, 09:5556,374+16
10 Aug 2026, 12:0156,358-6
9 Aug 2026, 09:5156,364+40
8 Aug 2026, 08:0056,324+257
7 Aug 2026, 07:0756,067+133
6 Aug 2026, 05:4355,934no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:0455,934first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.6%
avg views ÷ 56,405 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,700
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held68 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total1,135,800
Reactions total22,487
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,950
Videos
806
Links
6,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 21s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17,896 reactions across 60 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,43830.4%
👍4,48425.1%
🤡2,14512.0%
🔥1,2406.93%
🤣9445.27%
💯7534.21%
😁6113.41%
👎5282.95%
custom 53889103741226977864652.60%
🤬4052.26%
🤔1720.961%
🥰1140.637%
👏980.548%
🙏910.508%
🏆800.447%
❤‍🔥780.436%
🤯400.224%
😢190.106%
🥴180.101%
🍾170.095%
24 further kinds1560.872%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,487reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 68 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spartakoz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈5,920 views114 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣57👍1817🤡11🤔9🥱2

12 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈6,200 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026

По Самородову в кружке снизу

🤣49custom 538891037412269778610🤔7👎4👍21🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈7,150 views149 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кстати, тут есть некорректная мысль про Барко и Черникова. То есть мысль-то корректная, но надо обязательно сказать, что аргентинец до матча несколько дней не тренировался из-за сильного ушиба спины. Вышел Эсекьель по своей инициативе с разрешения штаба — очень хотел, но быстро стало ясно, что играть на полную не может — вот Черников его и съел. Надеюсь, к «Балтике» Барко восстановится. Подписывайтесь на 📱 КБ Теле

👍111🙏1513🤡3😁3👌2🔥1🥱1

12 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈8,730 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @spartak_academyPhoto

⚡️⚡️⚡️ АКАДЕМИЯ «СПАРТАК» ОБЪЯВЛЯЕТ О ПРОВЕДЕНИИ ОТБОРА ЮНОШЕЙ 2018 ГОДА РОЖДЕНИЯ! 📌 23 августа в Сокольниках состоится отборочное занятие для юных футболистов 2018 года рождения, мечтающих стать частью спартаковской семьи! 📝 Как поучаствовать в отборе, рассказано здесь 🔗 ❓ Остались вопросы? Задайте их здесь 🔗

👍456🔥3🤣2👎1

12 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈12,700 views165 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Давайте решим, кто должен играть в воротах «Спартака» в следующем матче

  1. Максименко21%
  2. Помазун69%
  3. Купите лучше (напишу в комментарии фамилию)10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍129🤡117🤯6😭6🤪3💯2😱1

12 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈14,000 views135 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Почему «Краснодар» обыграл «Спартак»? Настоящие причины. https://www.sport-express.ru/football/rfpl/reviews/krasnodar-obygral-spartak-v-3-m-ture-rpl-takticheskiy-razbor-matcha-za-schet-chego-pobedila-komanda-musaeva-2446325/

👎71👍30🤡1512🔥4🤷‍♂3

11 Aug 2026, 22:11 UTC≈17,300 views230 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Андрей, давай честно. Станкович никогда и не был хорошим тренером. Почему? Тут может быть много однородных членов предложения, но самое главное — он на Кипре не работал. Как известно, лучшие люди именно оттуда в Россию приходят. Господин Тричковски не даст соврать: https://t.me/megabodr/5274

😁157🤡4013🔥7👍5👎5💯2🥱1

11 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈18,200 views513 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ливай в одном эпизоде сделал все, чего не показывал в «Спартаке»: прессинговал, быстро стартовал и точно пробил. Его голы за «Панатинаикос» для меня новостью не будут — он классный форвард, которому в Москве места не нашли https://t.me/prospartak/8504

👍292🤣123🤡5221🔥13🥴7🥱4🤔1

11 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈17,300 views167 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @showspartakPhoto

🫣 Узнали? Обсуждаем потенциальный трансфер дня: «Спартак» предложил «Сочи» 200 млн руб за вратаря Александра Дёгтева! 👀 Кстати, Максим Никитин ещё месяц назад высоко котировал вероятность этого приезда ❤️ Спартак Шоу

🔥8326🤔18👍12❤‍🔥9🤡9👎8😱2

11 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈17,700 views631 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ожидаемо под видео о Максименко куча негатива. Всему виной — разочарование. Ну а как? Первые два удара в створ — два гола. О чем тут еще говорить? Вот из-за вратаря и проиграли. Это простой вывод. Жвачка. А в остальном «Спартак» проиграл центр, а следовательно дал «Краснодару» лучшие условия для создания моментов. Но это ж зачем разбираться, если есть Максименко, можно ему за шиворот навалять. Пусть выгребает. К Ма

🤡390👍13940👎21custom 538891037412269778619❤‍🔥11👏3🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈17,000 views592 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @showspartakVideo

❓ И в чем Максименко не прав? ⚡️ Максим Никитин сыграл роль последнего защитника и отбил вратаря от нападающих комментаторов ✍️ Разбираем залетевшие мячи «Краснодара»: 📺 YouTube 🎥 ВК 🎥 TikTok ❤️ Спартак Шоу

🤡347👍8771💯28👎24custom 538891037412269778617👏6😐5

10 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC≈18,300 views390 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не все заметили, но на прессухе случился поединок между Карседо и Мусаевым. Мусаев Мы забили два гола с позиции Жедсона? Мы хотели так играть. Жедсон иногда проваливается на такой позиции. Карседо Была пара ошибок сегодня. Это командные, а не персональные недочеты. Два быстрых удара стали решающими. Я не согласен с мнением Мусаева. Кто прав? Пересмотрел матч еще вчера в ночи, поэтому сформулировал мнение по Жед

184👍136🤡23💯22🤔16🔥6👎2😴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @spartakoz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@spartakoz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTCAnonymous Poll7,600 voters approx.

Давайте решим, кто должен играть в воротах «Спартака» в следующем матче

  1. Максименко21%
  2. Помазун69%
  3. Купите лучше (напишу в комментарии фамилию)10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 13,321 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов
@karpinside · 142,129
3 posts
Народная Команда
@mediakomanda · 12,082
3 posts
У Кузьмича|"Спартак"
@ykuzmicha · 29,579
3 posts
Агрегатор | Футбол
@agr_football · 7
2 posts
Moss // Михаил Моссаковский
@mossakovskiy · 8,320
2 posts
МЯЧ RU
@myachrus · 90,333
2 posts
Бар «Мясницкий»
@myasnitskiybar · 1,067
2 posts
Записки рыжего журналиста
@notesofajournalist · 4,961
2 posts
Свиное Рыло
@pigesface · 14,508
2 posts
Фабрика Спартака
@fabrikaspartaka · 33,239
1 post
Под грифом «Футбольно»
@grif_football · 33
1 post
Иван Писака | Григорий Телингатер
@ivanpisaka · 3,427
1 post
Мясной сектор | Новости «Спартака»
@Meat_sector · 135
1 post
Бодрость Духа
@megabodr · 9,639
1 post
(Не)Святой пост
@nesvyatoy_post · 59
1 post
SPARTAK NEWS
@news_spartak · 48
1 post
Nozeratti
@nozeratti · 3,663
1 post
Мутко против
@offsider · 66,301
1 post
Игра в касание
@one_touch_game · 209
1 post
Очковый запас
@shitandstaff · 61
1 post
Спартак Шоу
@showspartak · 6,037
1 post
Красно - белая трибуна
@spartak_kbtribuna · 789
1 post
Вован МЯЧ Production | Грилиш philosophy
@Vovanmyach · 18,197
1 post
Записки комментатора | Михаил Полынцов
@zapiski_commentatora · 80
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФК «Спартак-Москва»
@fcsmtg · 270,510
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Спорт на Кинопоиске
@sportonkp · 149,181
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Чемпионат
@championat · 253,080
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Okko Спорт
@okkosport · 161,449
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига
@premierliga · 189,939
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
МАТЧ ПРЕМЬЕР
@matchpremier · 307,573
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
WINLINE
@winline · 264,301
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔴⚪️КБ ТЕЛЕГА | Никитин” (@spartakoz), 56,405 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spartakoz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.