Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
39,700 average views per post against 44,744 subscribers — an engagement rate of 88.7%. Across the 7,904 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,961 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.93% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.4%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
26 of 26 published in the window (0 exact, 26 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,031,950
Mature posts only
98.4% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,721–44,749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 22:59
44,734
-10
11 Aug 2026, 19:33
44,744
-2
10 Aug 2026, 16:42
44,746
+8
9 Aug 2026, 17:02
44,738
-3
8 Aug 2026, 20:12
44,741
-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:57
44,742
+18
6 Aug 2026, 19:22
44,724
-6
6 Aug 2026, 06:15
44,730
no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:09
44,730
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
88.7%
avg views ÷ 44,734 subscribers
Avg views / post
39,700
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
26 (18 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
1,031,950
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
3.85%
1 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
12,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
43,400
over 25 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJmi8Au
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
ПСЖ vs Астон Вилла: кто возьмёт Суперкубок УЕФА?
У парижан небольшие проблемы в предсезонке и слухи о новом вратаре, а Астон Вилла провела серьёзную ротацию состава. Получится ли одолеть команду Луиса Энрике с Сафоновым в воротах?
Узнаем уже сегодня в 22:00 — включай трансляцию и наслаждайся топовым футболом в Okko!
Смотри тут: https://okko.tv/s/11qm
Если Альварес действительно надумал бунтовать, то как будто поздновато. «Атлетико» провел очень сильную трансферную кампанию, решил некоторые хронические проблемы, необходимость срочно искать замену Альваресу в начале сезона все испортит. На сильные ходы мало времени. Переговорная позиция будет слабой. Поэтому удержать Альвареса сейчас – важнее, чем было в начале лета. Да и Симеоне уже выразил радость от того, что «т…
Араухо сочетает топ-качество в единоборствах с глупыми ошибками. И сочетает ментальную неустойчивость с сильной мотивацией перезапустить карьеру. Спокойствия «Ливерпулю» не добавит, но в хорошем сценарии компенсирует это драйвом, агрессией и атлетизмом. И, возможно, голами. Хочется поболеть за хороший сценарий.
Впечатляет объем работы, которую «Реал» ведет на трансферном рынке. Можно по-разному относиться к выбранному вектору, к конкретным решениям, но именно масштаб проделываемой работы – огромный. «Реал» оформил несколько быстрых трансферов в самом начале окна, сейчас ведет два громких дорогих трансфера и параллельно продал воспитанников на 150 млн. Все это – работа, которая требует времени и усилий, как минимум, чтобы пр…
Если «Барселона» отпустит Феррана до того, как найдет ему замену, любой форвард в любом клубе сразу начнет стоить для «Барселоны» дороже. Потому что без форвардов в заявке у «Барселоны» будет слишком слабая позиция в переговорах.
Есть много причин не отпускать Феррана (и повысить ему зарплату), но эта причина – самая очевидная. Можно даже его хейтить, но все равно отпускать его сейчас, не купив заранее замену – глуп…
Идея Инфантино о продаже части прав на ЧМ – очень мутная. Не только из-за его партнеров, но и сама по себе. Есть много вопросов по контрольному пакету акций, распределению полномочий и потенциальным последствиям для формата турнира. В то же время такая реакция УЕФА – тоже странная.
Она вся свелась к популизму, вроде «футбол – это не товар», «нельзя продавать душу футбола», «Инфантино пересек черту», «футбол должен п…
«Челси» продолжает приятно удивлять – и уже состоявшимися подписаниями, и слухами о новых трансферах. Лакруа сильнее всех защитников, купленных в последние годы. Интерес к Хендерсону тоже говорит об осознании важной проблемы. Хендерсон был капитаном команды ментальных монстров, выражаясь языком Клоппа. И он выиграл все на клубном уровне. Молодому амбициозному проекту этого очень не хватает. Стоунз тоже пригодился бы,…
Через три дня рассказываю, чем может кончиться тренинг личностного роста, к чему приводит спонтанный отпуск и как дать взятку самому себе. Осталось 10 билетов.
Билеты
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @cholo_football. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 19,259 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
МЯЧ Production @myachpro · 375,090 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
GOAL24 @GOAL24Main · 999,955 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Реальный Футбол LIVE @rflive · 236,274 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
FC BARCELONA @newsbarca · 332,733 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Okko Спорт @okkosport · 161,449 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Official Fabrizio Romano @FabrizioRomanoTG · 379,249 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Real Madrid CF | Реал Мадрид @realmadridcdf · 328,682 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Диего Симеонович | Кирилл Хаит о футболе” (@cholo_football), 44,734 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cholo_football.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
