Channel
@cholo_football
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
45,237subscribers
+507 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001279955418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cholo_football |
| Description | Кирилл Хаит о футболе ▶️ Видео https://www.youtube.com/c/КириллХаит ✅ Подписные видео https://boosty.to/cholo По вопросам сотрудничества: @advertisement91 Регистрация в Роскомнадзоре: clck.ru/3EucBN |
| Created | 22 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cholo_football |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
41,900 average views per post against 45,237 subscribers — an engagement rate of 92.7%. Across the 8,376 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.02% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.
| Window | 30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 46 of 46 published in the window (0 exact, 46 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,928,100 |
| Mature posts only | 93.9% over 45 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 45,237 measured 18 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 8,376 channels · p10 2.50% · p25 5.02% · p50 10.5% · p75 20.9% · p90 35.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.701th percentile · 8.8× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.068% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 45,237 | +4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 45,233 | +14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 45,219 | +161 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 45,058 | -20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 45,078 | +34 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 45,044 | +32 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 45,012 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 45,004 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:26 | 45,000 | +16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:05 | 44,984 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 44,985 | +16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 44,969 | +19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 44,950 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 44,942 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 44,929 | +18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 44,911 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 44,905 | +25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 44,880 | +31 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 44,849 | +38 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 44,811 | first reading |
96 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 96 (18 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,928,100 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFJAbK9j | 1 | 9 September 2026 | 9 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFJmi8Au | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Буду разочарован в АПЛ, если «Сити» накажут трофейно, а не финансово. Одна из причин такого возвышения лиги в последние 20 лет – неадекватные инвестиции, которые меняли правила игры и со временем задавали новые стандарты. Ситуация, когда «Вест Хэм» или «Лидс» может перебить предложение «Милана» или «Интера» – естественное следствие этих процессов. Это плохо для Серии А, но клубы АПЛ никогда не имели столько возможнос…
Хорошая постановка вопроса.
Последние две недели Мбаппе потрясающе работает без мяча. Полная самоотдача, огромный объем работы, готовность выполнять черновую работу, заученные алгоритмы – все это он демонстрирует в ходе интервью перед «Золотым мячом». Возможно, это добавит ему больше голосов. Но постоянное напоминание о том, что у него был отличный сезон, вряд ли добавляет ему любви болельщиком «Реала». Новый выпуск – экспериментальный. В пус…
Мне понравилось, как играл «Атлетико», а в матче были плохие судейские решения в обе стороны. Поэтому я не могу сводить эту победу к судейству. Некрасивые победы бывают у всех клубов, но некрасивая победа и незаслуженная – разные вещи. Возможно, это моя предвзятость. Проверить (и убедиться) можно в новом обзоре тура. P.S. По звуку есть две новости. Первая: у меня теперь хороший. Вторая: теперь плохой у Гриши. Вырази…
Немного странно называть тренерской победу, в которой случилось удаление с пенальти в начале второго тайма. Но влияние Симеоне на ход матча огромно. Это и стартовый состав с Джулиано, который сыграл ключевую роль. И замена в перерыве – вместо висящего на желтой Пубиля на фланг сел Льоренте, а в центр вышел Коке, это атакующий размен. И на второй тайм «Атлетико» вышел конструктивно заряженным: пять минут до пенальти …
«Удаляйте всех. ВАР разберет своих». Арбитр Амальрик, 1209 год.
Рафинья: «Не даете мне Золотой мяч? Попробуйте не дать мне Золотую бутсу».
Офигенный «Брайтон» забил два похожих гола, не довел до гола пару прекрасных комбинаций, но в первую очередь впечатлил игрой без мяча. Панические выносы в аут – не меньший признак превосходства, чем счет на табло. «Брайтон» забрал 23 подбора на чужой половине. «Арсенал» – три.
«Астон Вилла» приехала на этот матч, имея после четырех туров одно очко и разницу голов 1-7. Провальный старт сезона. И примерно полчаса «Тоттенхэм» эту «Астон Виллу» просто возил. Но команда сохранила спокойствие, не развалилась, дождалась своих шансов и хладнокровно их реализовала. Год назад «Вилле» понадобилось шесть туров, чтобы одержать первую победу в АПЛ – и ничего, команда не поплыла, выдала серию побед, пот…
«Тоттенхэм» намного лучше своих результатов.
Вылет «МЮ» из самого незначительного турнира из-за поражения в матче, где Каррик выпустил молодежь – в теории не то событие, которое должно влиять на отношение к команде. Но проблема в сюжете матча. Обстоятельства поражения вызывают слишком много негативных эмоций. Это токсичное событие, теперь давление на команду усилится. Неожиданный плюс ситуации в том, что до этого в «МЮ» могло быть два мнения о глубине состава…
Возможно, когда-нибудь я пойму, как Флик это делает. С Жезусом, Эриком, Мартином, Рэшфордом, Адейеми. Когда-нибудь. Но пока я не понимаю. Интересно, если зимой в «Барселону» перейдет Перишич, забьет 10 голов?
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @cholo_football. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 75 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Диего Симеонович | Кирилл Хаит о футболе” (@cholo_football), 45,237 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cholo_football.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.