Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +446. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 215,043–216,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 19:36
215,761
+111
11 Aug 2026, 18:42
215,650
-768
10 Aug 2026, 16:14
216,418
+1,118
9 Aug 2026, 19:11
215,300
+78
8 Aug 2026, 18:47
215,222
-42
7 Aug 2026, 17:06
215,264
-54
6 Aug 2026, 15:51
215,318
+3
6 Aug 2026, 01:30
215,315
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:18
215,315
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 215,761 subscribers
Avg views / post
34,100
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
57 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
1,942,690
Reactions total
58,761
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 21s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
56,347 reactions across 54 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
42,233
75.0%
🔥
3,982
7.07%
❤🔥
2,707
4.80%
⚡
1,553
2.76%
🤣
990
1.76%
🎃
684
1.21%
😭
603
1.07%
😍
504
0.894%
👏
426
0.756%
🏆
403
0.715%
💘
333
0.591%
👍
318
0.564%
🥰
268
0.476%
😁
200
0.355%
👎
176
0.312%
🎉
106
0.188%
🤯
104
0.185%
😈
101
0.179%
💋
91
0.161%
🤩
63
0.112%
26 further kinds
502
0.891%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58,761reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😱 Вы сумасшедшие, Саранск!
Сегодня вас было очень много на стадионе, а когда мы уезжали, вы устроили такой шум, который мы точно не забудем!
Настоящие самураи, спасибо вам за эту поддержку! Надеемся, что обязательно ещё вернёмся к вам! 🥷
🥳 Победная раздевалка, речь Ивана Сергеевича и первые эмоции игроков после невероятного матча!
Настоящая магия 2DROTS существует. Мы вытащили эту игру! 🥷
А теперь вы делитесь своими эмоциями в комментариях 👇
🥷 Герой сегодняшнего матча в Саранске!
Антон Полюткин, обязательно подписывайтесь на него!
Это была его первая игра за 2DROTS, и сразу такой матч. Кажется, у него уже есть ДНК команды 🧬
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @twodrotsshow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 415 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Анар Абдуллаев | anarabdullaev twitch @anarabdullaevtwitch · 590,270 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
FONBET @fonbet_official · 252,806 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Футбольный транслятор | Чемпионат Мира @ftlive · 154,207 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
ЖИЗНЬ ФУТБОЛ @zhfootballll · 495,816 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 August 2026
АртПо @artpo17 · 278,594 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Матч ТВ @match_tv · 677,447 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026
GOAL24 @GOAL24Main · 999,955 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Реальный Футбол LIVE @rflive · 236,274 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
BETBOOM @betboom · 151,412 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
ГЛЕБАС @glebaseey · 173,270 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
Бустероид 🥋🥊 @busteroid3000 · 451,407 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 August 2026
ПФК ЦСКА @pfccskamoscow · 178,253 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Hardcore Fighting @hardcore_fightingtg · 261,249 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
Медийка @mediyca · 715,826 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 August 2026
► ► ► Паша ПЭЛ 🟢 @pel_video · 299,823 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
WINLINE @winline · 264,301 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
ГОРДЕЙ @GORDEYLIVE · 650,206 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 August 2026
Спортс“ @sportsru · 451,969 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Футбол 24/7 | Чемпионат Мира @footballhourss · 154,352 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Main Card @MainCardMMA · 205,033 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
MELLSTROY ДВИЖ @tellstroy · 868,433 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
BATEK_OFFICIAL @batek_official · 399,861 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 August 2026
Офис Стила | steel streams @steelstaya · 215,993 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
Рифмы и Музыка @rhymesmus · 374,142 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Осколков, Альберт Николаевич(ru.wikipedia.org) “…html|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/twodrotsshow/5925|title=2DROTS|website=Telegram|access-date=2025-06-10|a…” read 9 August 2026
Шмаров, Валерий Валентинович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…sports.ru|access-date=2024-12-17}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/twodrotsshow/5925|title=2DROTS|website=Telegram|access-date=2025-06-10}}…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“2DROTS” (@twodrotsshow), 215,761 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twodrotsshow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.