Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Уан Писака | Григорий Телингатер

@telingaterEPL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,320subscribers

-67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001416601760
TypeChannel
Username@telingaterEPL
DescriptionСамое сочное про АПЛ и мировой футбол от журналиста @championat Григория Телингатера. Амбассадор слова «кабздец». За оскорбления и пиратские видосы - бан. По рекламе: @telingater РНК: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67989b0b58ab2221b0ef15bc
Created17 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/telingaterEPL

Growth

27,32027,38727,353.56 August 2026 — 27,387 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,379 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,349 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,336 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,346 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,336 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,320 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,310–27,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:3827,320-16
11 Aug 2026, 22:0227,336-10
10 Aug 2026, 22:3627,346+10
9 Aug 2026, 19:5127,336-13
8 Aug 2026, 22:0327,349-16
8 Aug 2026, 00:5127,365-14
7 Aug 2026, 02:3727,379-8
6 Aug 2026, 06:1627,387first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.8%
avg views ÷ 27,320 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,900
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held31 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total523,420
Reactions total10,808
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,280
Videos
696
Links
1,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,632 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8,41587.4%
👎1,21712.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,808reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 31 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @telingaterEPL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC≈9,920 views271 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Прикиньте, сколько разочарования «ПСЖ» принёс английским клубам за последние годы (финал КЧМ-2025 – исключение). И вот снова «ПСЖ» прошёл команду АПЛ. Ожидаемо, хотя местами «Вилла» смотрелась получше. Даже заставляла французов играть просто на вынос. В целом во втором тайме куча брака. Видно, что первый матч сезона. Даже по тому, как ноги сводило. @telingaterEPL

👍265👎6

12 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC≈11,000 views326 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Подскажите, есть ли в мире футболисты сильнее Джона Макгинна? Смотришь на него – вроде какой-то мясник рубится, а потом тонкая передача, хоккейная обводочка с разворотом и идеальные навесы. @telingaterEPL

👍322👎4

12 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈12,000 views299 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

Джед Спенс переходит в «Интер». Обычно Италия забирает у АПЛ тех футболистов, которые оказались не нужны английским клубам. Чуть удивительно, что Спенс оказался таким. Даже после убедительного ЧМ-2026. Хороший вариант для «Интера», который нуждался в таком игроке после ухода Думфриса. Забрали один из лучших доступных вариантов. А вообще англичанин в Серии А – это просто редкость. Вряд ли вы многих вспомните. Скорее

👍295👎4

11 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC≈13,200 views188 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

По итогам прошлого сезона в ЛЧ пробились 29 команд. Этим летом шёл отбор, в котором на разных этапах стартовали 54 команды. Воронка с узким горлышком, где на выходе семь клубов заберут оставшиеся путёвки в основную стадию ЛЧ. Сейчас определились финальные пары отбора. Каждый победитель будет в основной стадии ЛЧ. Например, гарантированно пробьётся либо словацкий «Слован», либо словенский «Целе». Теоретически могут п

👍187👎1

9 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈17,800 views355 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Искусство заголовка от Фабрицио Романо: • Начинать с двух максмально кликбейтных слов «шок бомба» • не забыть пару восклицательных знаков • всё писать заглавными буквами @telingaterEPL

👍333👎22

8 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈18,700 views362 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

А есть такое, что только футболисты выбривают себе линию на брови? У вас много знакомых так ходит? У меня – ноль. Я так понимаю, это чтобы ещё более дерзким казаться. @telingaterEPL

👍341👎21

7 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC≈20,000 views373 reactionsread 13 August 2026

«Ливерпуль» отпустил косячного Конате, чтобы взять в аренду такого же Рональда Араухо из «Барсы». Выглядит весьма иронично. Чисто, чтобы фанаты «Ливерпуля» не расслаблялись. Будто немножко рандомная сделка. Ничто не предвещало, а тут сразу here we go. Получите капитана «Барсы», который сбавил в последние годы и даже пропустил полтора месяца из-за депрессии. И тут ещё все триггеры могут оказаться рядом. Вот Барколя,

👍361👎12

7 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈17,100 views1,020 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

В комментариях спрашивали про наш с Кириллом подкаст «Футболятор». Увы, его не будет в наступающем сезоне. Возможно через год к этому вернёмся. А что касается этого сезона, то что-то где-то вероятно запустим. @telingaterEPL

👎996👍24

6 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈17,800 views264 reactionsread 13 August 2026

«Реал» официально объявил Диоманде. Для меня это самый интеренсый трансфер лета. Очень жаль, что не в «Ливерпуле» оказался. Я бы хотел посмотреть на этого вингера в АПЛ. Обычно я не особо верю в футболистов, у которых пока только один хороший сезон в карьере, но тут исключение. В парне есть что-то особенное. Человек будто на другой скорости существует. В Бундеслиге несколько раз накручивал троих и забивал. Причём, н

👍251👎13

6 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈15,800 views288 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

На The Athletic вышло интервью CEO «Ньюкасла» Дэвида Хопкинсона. Босс клуба обильно захвалил Эдди Хау за его работу и попробовал убедить, что клуб вовсе не разваливается, а перезапускается. Больше всего понравилась фраза Хопкинсона, что «невероятная команда аналитиков изучила около 178 потенциальных тренеров». Тут сразу много хорошего. Прежде всего, само выражение «около 178». Забавно звучит, потому что обычно после

👍285👎3

6 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈15,700 views297 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Расходимся. Вини остаётся в «Реале», судя по инсайдам Романо. Интересно, что потом бразилец скажет про исчезновение всех фоток в аккаунте. Чисто потролить? И ещё бы понять, пойдёт ли «Арсенал» за другой большой сделкой? Тем временем открывается новый портал. Родри не просто хочет в «Реал». Там он уже и в «Барсу» готов идти. И стилистически она ему даже больше подходит. Такое ощущение, что он уже устал от «Сити». Ну

👍279👎18

5 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC≈17,200 views318 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

В комментариях попросили поянить за имя новичка «Арсенала». Поясняю. Бруно пишется с «о» в конце. Так устоялось в русском языке, что у бразильцев «о» в конце, а у португальцев «у». Так оно и с Роналдо и Роналду. В бразильской и португальской версиях хватает отличий, но не в этом. Они произносят одинаково с «у», но в русском написании есть отличие. В каком-то смысле это удобно, чтобы разграничить игроков. Дальше по ф

👍318

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @telingaterEPL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 42,404 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

МЯЧ Production
@myachpro · 374,658
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
GOAL24
@GOAL24Main · 986,265
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Чемпионат
@championat · 252,825
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Okko Спорт
@okkosport · 162,553
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Official Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomanoTG · 379,249
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Уан Писака | Григорий Телингатер” (@telingaterEPL), 27,320 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telingaterEPL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.