Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Opta Sports

@optarussia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

12,186subscribers

+273 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001239015251
TypeChannel
Username@optarussia
Created25 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/optarussia

Growth

11,91312,18612,049.56 August 2026 — 11,913 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,913 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,920 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,915 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,916 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,934 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,963 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,144 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,186 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +273. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,872–12,227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:2412,186+42
12 Aug 2026, 08:3212,144+181
11 Aug 2026, 08:5311,963+29
10 Aug 2026, 06:1411,934+18
9 Aug 2026, 06:4311,916+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:0611,915-5
7 Aug 2026, 07:4111,920+7
6 Aug 2026, 10:0611,913no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5311,913first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 12,186 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,230
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held39 (26 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total204,040
Reactions total3,642
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,642 reactions across 39 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍92025.3%
73720.2%
🔥64617.7%
😁3419.36%
🤣2296.29%
🤯1082.97%
👏952.61%
🤡932.55%
🤮601.65%
😢591.62%
💩571.57%
👎381.04%
😍371.02%
😐360.988%
💔340.934%
❤‍🔥310.851%
🏆160.439%
🤔90.247%
😱80.22%
🍌70.192%
20 further kinds812.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,642reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC≈1,940 views70 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚽️Брайан Маджо – самый молодой игрок в старте в финалах Суперкубка Европы Нападающему «Астон Виллы» всего 17 лет и 212 дней. *данные с 2006 года @optarussia

🔥38😁17👍85😱2

11 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC≈11,400 views95 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🥩 Маркиньос – лидер нового сезона РПЛ по передачам под удар (13), передачам под удар с игры (11) и созданным явным моментам (3) Он также один из трех игроков, отметившихся результативными действиями во всех трех стартовых турах (также Кривцов и Глушенков). @optarussia

👍6318🔥6🤮4🤡2💩1😁1

11 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈4,150 views103 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

«Факел» внезапно ворвался в топ-2 РПЛ по ожидаемым голам😮

🤯58👍2310🔥9🤩3

11 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈3,650 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⛽️«Оренбург» – самая прессингующая команда нового сезона РПЛ Оренбуржцы лидируют в лиге по высоким отборам (29), ударам после высоких отборов (7) и возвратам мяча в финальной трети (20). 2-3 места в этих категориях делят «Спартак» и «Балтика». @optarussia

👍427😁4

11 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈3,890 views92 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚂Алексей Батраков не забивает 7 матчей подряд в РПЛ – его антирекорд Батраков нанес на этом отрезке 14 ударов (4 в створ, 0.99 xG). В последний раз Алексей забивал в РПЛ еще в апреле против «Оренбурга». @optarussia

🤣47😐20😢149👍2

9 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC≈4,990 views115 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🐻Обновленный предиктор – «Краснодар» вплотную приблизился к «Зениту» по шансам на чемпионство (39% против 42%), «Спартак» тоже в гонке (11%) @optarussia

🤣73👍1911🔥3🤔2🥱2🏆1💯1

9 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC≈5,220 views83 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🥩«Спартак» проиграл 6 из 8 матчей против команд из топ-3 турнирной таблицы с начала прошлого сезона РПЛ В том числе проиграв 3 из 3 матчей против «Краснодара». *места в таблице на начало тура, матчи первого тура не учитываются @optarussia

33🤣22👍13🏆5😢3🤡21🌭1

9 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC≈5,170 views101 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🐂Из последних 8 команд, набравших 9 очков после первых 3 туров, только одна в итоге стала чемпионом – «Зенит» в сезоне-2021/22 @optarussia

😁76👍16🤡7👏1🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈4,080 views78 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🐂«Краснодар» выиграл 4 из последних 5 матчей в РПЛ, когда уступал в счете, в том числе дважды обыграв «Спартак» С начала прошлого сезона «Краснодар» набрал 19 волевых очков в РПЛ – больше всех в лиге. https://t.me/fckrasnodar/25398

41👍19🔥11🤡4👎2🤬1

9 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈4,260 views73 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🐂Никита Кривцов – третий игрок в истории «Краснодара» с результативными действиями в каждом из первых трех туров сезона в РПЛ Ранее подобное удавалось только Федору Смолову (2016/17) и Эдуарду Сперцяну (2022/23 и 2025/26). https://t.me/matchpremier/28946

👏4514🔥8👍6

9 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,720 views174 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🕊«Родина» – первый клуб, поднявшийся из ФНЛ, и одержавший волевую победу на «Газпром Арене» в РПЛ https://t.me/matchpremier/28942

97👍34❤‍🔥11🔥10🤣9💩5🏆4👏2

9 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈4,310 views115 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🕊Артур Гарибян – первый игрок в истории, вышедший на замену и оформивший дубль на «Газпром Арене» в РПЛ за гостевую команду Он также стал лишь вторым игроком в истории, оформившим дубль на «Газпром Арене» за команду, только что поднявшуюся из ФНЛ. Первым был Денис Ткачук за «Крылья Советов» в 2019 году. https://t.me/matchpremier/28941

🔥74👍16❤‍🔥124👎3💔2😱2🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @optarussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,706 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Okko Спорт
@okkosport · 162,553
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
РФС | Сборная России по футболу
@teamrussia · 142,557
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига
@premierliga · 189,939
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
МАТЧ ПРЕМЬЕР
@matchpremier · 307,573
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов
@karpinside · 142,129
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
Спорт на Кинопоиске
@sportonkp · 149,181
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Чемпионат
@championat · 252,825
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Спортс“
@sportsru · 451,689
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Аюпов, Тимур Ансарович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…тура против «[[Химки (футбольный клуб)|Химок]]»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/optarussia/2372|title=Егорычев стал первым игроком «Урала», отдавшим 3 голевые…”
read 9 August 2026
Егорычев, Андрей Сергеевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…уральцев в высший дивизион в сезоне-2013/14{{Cite web|lang=ru|url=https://t.me/optarussia/2372|title=Егорычев стал первым игроком «Урала», отдавшим 3 голевые…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Opta Sports” (@optarussia), 12,186 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/optarussia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.