Channel
@modestpapi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,678subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001227977368 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @modestpapi |
| Created | 27 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/modestpapi |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 4,678 | -33 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 4,711 | +12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 4,699 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 4,703 | -12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 4,715 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:26 | 4,706 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 4,717 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 4,724 | -15 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 4,739 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 4,741 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 4,744 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 4,750 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 4,750 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
215 reactions across 10 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 31.6% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 10.2% | |
| 🍾 | 16 | 7.44% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 6.51% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 5.58% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 4.65% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.26% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.86% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 1.86% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.93% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.465% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.465% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.465% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Случилось прекрасное — выездной комплект «Ноттингем Форрест». Конечно же, привлек моё внимание лиственный паттерн, который лег в основу дизайна. Решение, которое так напрашивалось, наконец на базе! А ещё классное сочетание красных акцентов и темно-темно-зелёного основного цвета. môdest
🔥16🍾2
Один из приятнейших комплектов этого сезона для меня лично — выездной у «Альмерии». Сочетания цветов, поло с 1 пуговицей и эффектный альтернативный лого. Кайф! môdest
❤18🍾2
Как вместить десятки сказочных сюжетов в одну футболку и не потерять клубную айдентику? Ответ нашла дагестанская художница Арина Ломакина — автор работы, ставшей основной дизайна нового гостевого комплекта Махачкалинской команды: Продумать геометрию, в которую получится вписать много разных сюжетов, было одной из первоочередных задач. Ромбы стали тем звеном, которое соединило классическую динамовскую айдентику и же…
🔥8👏4❤2😍2🍾1👎1
В РПЛ, кажется, чуть проблемы с пингом — иначе объяснить выпуск промо сезона к 3-му туру, а не к старту, я просто не могу. Тотальный кринж. Посмотрю в конце сезона, разницы же нет, коллеги? https://t.me/premierliga/41932
🤡9💩4🥴4🍾3❤2
Картина петербургского художника Филиппа Орлова «Вратарь». Масло, канвас. môdest
❤11👍3🍾2
Снова adidas, снова ретро, снова хорошо. Если отбросить снобизм и мысли типа «задолбала эта старина, неужели нельзя что-то новое придумать» — видно, что комплект произведен что надо. Во-первых, прямого омажа на джерси из прошлых сезонов нет: такой лого использовали в конце 40-х, по центру он был последний раз 20 лет назад, по центру последний раз использовали, а полосу на груди в подобном исполнении не нашел даже в…
❤18👍3🔥2🍾1
Одна из лучших джерси сезона — у лидеров сезона! Не знаю, про кого вы подумали, а я про махачкалинское «Динамо». Черная основа с волнообразным паттерном, блики волн Каспийского моря, альтернативный лого на традиционном узоре по центру груди — супер! Уже сегодня увидим форму на поле в матче «Динамо» и «Крыльев» в Кубке.
👍16👎10💩6❤5👏3🍾1
Новая порция ретро – на этот раз тематическим комплектом обзавелся «Фулхэм». Непривычная для базового восприятия клуба красно-черная шахматка – отсылка к комплекту из сезона-1996/97, также использован старый логотип, который был актуален в период с 1972 по 1977. Вот вроде кайф, что видна качественная работа из раза в раз, а в итоге актуальность и уникальность теряется за счет раскатки концепции на множество клубов,…
🔥5👎3🍾1
В этом сезоне тренд на ретро перестал быть таким активным, как раньше, и теперь появляется более точечно — и качественно. Форма «Страсбурга» – отличное тому подтверждение: ворот поло, характерный ромбовидный узор, первый лого в истории клуба. môdest
🔥14❤5🤡3🙏3🍾2💔1
Межсезонье — время для зарубежных коммерческих туров у топ-клубов. «Бавария» вместе с adidas и Hypebeast сделали специальные шрифты для матчей в Чеджу и Гонконге. В стороне не остался мадридский «Атлетико», совместно с сеульским проектом Over The Pitch разработавший специальный шрифт для своего матча в Корее на основе традиционного письменного искусства. Детализация is the king. môdest
❤7🔥5💯4🍓1🍾1💘1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @modestpapi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“môdest” (@modestpapi), 4,678 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modestpapi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.