Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Коммент.Биги

Channel

Коммент.Биги

@CommentBiggy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,065subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001696801996
TypeChannel
Username@CommentBiggy
DescriptionМэр Нефтеюганска По всем вопросам – Елизавета Чалова @elchalova номер заявления на регистрацию в ркн 4973496736
Created28 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CommentBiggy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,95618,14318,049.518,0656 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,928–18,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:4918,065+3
9 Nov 2026, 06:4418,062-1
8 Nov 2026, 00:2118,063-11
7 Nov 2026, 00:3818,074-6
5 Nov 2026, 21:5618,080-4
4 Nov 2026, 20:5618,084-2
3 Nov 2026, 21:1018,086+3
2 Nov 2026, 18:5518,083+3
1 Nov 2026, 22:2818,080+3
31 Oct 2026, 19:1018,077+6
30 Oct 2026, 19:1918,071-8
29 Oct 2026, 22:4118,079-3
29 Oct 2026, 01:1918,082-9
27 Oct 2026, 21:3718,091-10
26 Oct 2026, 23:4718,101-6
25 Oct 2026, 21:5518,107-13
25 Oct 2026, 00:0418,120-3
23 Oct 2026, 20:5718,123-3
22 Oct 2026, 18:5518,126-1
21 Oct 2026, 15:4118,127first reading

Engagement

100 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.1%
avg views ÷ 18,065 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,620
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 100 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held100 (20 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total241,770
Reactions total6,897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 04:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,180
Videos
≈922
Links
≈790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 41s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,067 reactions across 100 posts, in 59 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7,96349.6%
🤣1,3888.64%
❤1,2177.57%
💯9105.66%
👍7314.55%
🤡6664.15%
🔥6393.98%
😢3872.41%
🙏2781.73%
💔2171.35%
👏1911.19%
❤‍🔥1881.17%
🕊1410.878%
😍1220.759%
🍌1080.672%
🌚1070.666%
😭1060.66%
🤝870.541%
🦄650.405%
💩600.373%
39 further kinds4963.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 100 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CommentBiggy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 100 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (4.65%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 20:34 UTC≈3,670 views67 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Мы должны учиться у этого человека

😁47🤣10❤4🔥3🫡2🦄1

9 Nov 2026, 20:34 UTC≈2,890 views49 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥35🦄8❤‍🔥6

9 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC≈4,180 views172 reactionsread 11 November 2026

315 часов до матча с Родиной. Галактионов всё ещё не уволен.

🤣132😎19🤷‍♂9😭6😁3👏1🤡1🦄1

9 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC≈4,360 views67 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Локомотив как может оттягивает на себя внимание, чтобы никто не заметил, как в сборную не поехали 27 очков по системе гол+пас. Вот что об этом пишет Сергей Егоров: Получается, что штаб сборной не словами, а делом подтвердили то, о чем говорят или шепчутся вокруг — в период отстранения от международных турниров сборная отходит на второй-третий план, результат там не важен (или точно — не насколько важен, как в клуба…

😐42😁14🤨6❤2🤡1🦄1😎1

8 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC≈4,290 views195 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @lokomotivnews

❗️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Юрий Нагорных пришел на пресс-конференцию Майкла Каррика после матча с «Астон Вилой» и объявил о его отставке 👉 Подпишись — Новости «Локомотива» #Локомотив

😁188👍5🤯1🦄1

7 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC≈5,240 views136 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

мысли?

🌚88😁27🤯11😢6💔1💩1🥰1🦄1

7 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTC≈5,130 views216 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Едем дальше!

😁197👍15❤2👏1🤮1

7 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈5,110 views94 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В студии Матч Премьер сейчас работает девушка. Браво 🤝

👍49😁19🥰9👏5❤3💊3🤮3🦄2

7 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC≈5,170 views196 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Футболисты Локомотива через пару дней выходных приезжают в Баковку, а там все ещё Галактионов. Прикиньте?

😁177🤣15🤯4

7 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC≈5,110 views137 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Президент ФИФА Джанни Инфантино отказался от идеи по расширению чемпионата мира.

😁132👍5

6 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC≈5,380 views245 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

Никаких эмоций. Даже это объявление на пресс-конференции выглядело как-то нелепо. Или я уже придираюсь. Наверное, хорошо, что пауза на сборные сейчас. И да, вы не спрашивали, но я отвечаю: сегодня тоже -25к😅

😁195💯18❤14💔7🙉5🤡3🦄2🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @CommentBiggy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 12:28 UTCAnonymous Poll1,920 voters approx.

Локомотив к успеху поведёт…

  1. Евсеев26%
  2. Игнашевич20%
  3. Бердыев8%
  4. Федотов30%
  5. Черчесов16%
  6. Галактионов13%
  7. Свой вариант в комментарии7%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTCAnonymous Poll1,620 voters approx.

Пристраиваем 25к

  1. Победа Локомотива24%
  2. Ничья14%
  3. Победа Спартака65%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTCAnonymous Poll2,080 voters approx.

В какой зоне финиширует Локомотив в сезоне 2026/27?

  1. 1-317%
  2. 4-549%
  3. 6-829%
  4. 9-104%
  5. 11-167%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Нельзя смеяться
@nesocial · 22,225
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 September 2026
Комментач
@Comment_ach · 22,809
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Коммент.Шоу
@comment_show · 57,019
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
Nobel
@nobel_arustamyan · 39,113
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 30 August 2026
Коммент.Генич
@kgenich · 52,378
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 24 August 2026
Городницкий | Футбол, деньги, медиа
@pgorodnitskiy · 51,888
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Казанский Код
@deniskazansky · 24,326
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
Здесь был Тимур | Тимур Журавель
@timzhur · 26,448
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 September 2026
Сплошняк | Дмитрий Шнякин
@shhhnyakin · 38,838
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
Он Эйр | Роман Нагучев
@offearth · 48,664
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 August 2026
Журнал Футбол
@sovsportru · 18,915
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
Open the Doors | Дорский
@openthedoors · 25,516
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 14 September 2026
Реальный Губер 🤘🏻
@RealGuberniev · 79,144
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Алё, рэф!
@aloref · 35,626
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 2 September 2026
ВГИК
@vgik_of · 37,962
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Эль Хугадор | Денис Алхазов
@alhasbro · 26,528
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Брейдо / И после
@BreydoChannel · 21,346
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 September 2026
Панк инсайд
@punkinside · 39,479
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 31 August 2026
РФС | Сборная России по футболу
@teamrussia · 144,980
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
BETBOOM
@betboom · 165,655
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
OFNEWS / Околоспортивные Новости
@ofnews · 85,930
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига
@premierliga · 194,395
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
МАТЧ ПРЕМЬЕР
@matchpremier · 305,791
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
о футболе на Руси | Алланазаров
@registaJournalista · 19,638
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Коммент.Биги” (@CommentBiggy), 18,065 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CommentBiggy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.