Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Общество распространения полезных книг

@obrpk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,303subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001038075348
TypeChannel
Username@obrpk
DescriptionРедкие книги, антиэстетическая пропаганда, темные стороны русской культуры и библиофилический андеграунд. Для содержательных сообщений (за сообщения о покупке/продаже рекламы - бан) @myiasis Поддержать: https://orpk.org/top-secret orpk.org
Created4 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/obrpk

Growth

26,26726,30326,2855 August 2026 — 26,267 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,267 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,273 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,276 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,279 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,288 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,290 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,296 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,303 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,262–26,308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:4426,303+7
11 Aug 2026, 12:1726,296+6
10 Aug 2026, 14:3826,290+2
9 Aug 2026, 15:1626,288+9
8 Aug 2026, 18:2326,279+3
7 Aug 2026, 15:3226,276+3
6 Aug 2026, 17:5026,273+6
6 Aug 2026, 02:0226,267no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:2826,267first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 26,303 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,800
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held27 (16 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total156,690
Reactions total1,837
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,540
Links
2,840

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,622 reactions across 25 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥75346.4%
63038.8%
23914.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,837reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 27 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @obrpk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,560 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как все нервные люди, Таня болезненно-остро переживала ненастье. Кораблинов, Владимир Александрович. Чертов лог : Роман. — Воронеж : Кн. изд–во, 1962. — 296 с. : ил.; 21 см. Цитата на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

14🔥87

11 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈2,290 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сибирские ночи отчаянно длинны. Сибирские избы отчаянно жарки, и в них не делают форточек, чтобы не уходило тепло. Я задыхался от невозможности разбить темноту, от отсутствия воздуха, из которого кошки забирали себе весь кислород, от их терпкого запаха, с которым я вдыхал астму, ненависть, ужас... На рассвете я стал забываться. Но лишь на минуты. Тогда происходили кошмары. То мне чудился мертвый ребенок, то слышалос

34🔥197

10 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈3,430 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Внутренний мир в почерке у псевдолюдей Моргенштерн, Илья Федорович. Внутренний мир в почерке у псевдолюдей / И. Ф. Моргенштерн. — Санкт-Петербург : Тип. «Рассвет», [1910]. Скачать книгу на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥341613

9 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈4,100 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Потом перекатился через порог в сени, из сеней на крыльцо, с крыльца на двор Каррик, Валерий Вильямович (1869–1943). Сказки-картинки / Валерий Каррик. — Санкт-Петербург: тип. Б. М. Вольфа, 1909–1916. № 2: Колобок. — [1909]. — 16 с. : ил. Иллюстрация на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

35🔥1410

8 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈3,970 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Колобок Денисов, В. Колобок / В. Денисов. — Москва: Г. Ф. Мириманов, 1927. — [8] с. : цв. ил.; 9×13 см. — (Книжка-малышка; № 15). Скачать книгу на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

5615🔥13

7 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC≈4,710 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Обложка редкой книги любимого издательства «Радуга». Каша, которой стоит бояться! Редин. Каша : [Стихи для детей] / Редин. Щеглов. — [Ленинград] : Радуга, [1927] (гос. тип. им. Ив. Федорова). — [11] с. : красочн. ил.; 19×15 см. Страница книги на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥4119

6 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC≈8,000 views122 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

В номинации на образ самого упоротого Колобка уверенно побеждает это издание! Феоктистов, Иван Иванович. Русские народные басни и сказки о зверях : (По А. Н. Афанасьеву и др.) / Сост. Ив. Феоктистов. — Москва : тип. т-ва И. Д. Сытина, 1909. — 43 с. : ил.; 23. Скачать книгу на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥702725

5 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC≈4,460 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Рисунок Владимира Конашевича. Кот в сапогах : сказка / рисунки Вл. Конашевича. — Петербург — : Изд-во З. И. Гржебин; Берлин : [б. и.], 1922. — 11, [1] с. : цв. ил.; 30 см. Иллюстрация на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

36🔥212

3 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC≈4,730 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Про Никак и Коекак. Гальперин, Михаил Петрович. Сказка про дело / Михаил Гальперин ; рис. Виталия Вермель. — Москва : издание автора, 1924. — [12] с. : ил.; 35 см. Иллюстрация на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥432210

2 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈5,020 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как только время стало деньгами, появилось выражение «трать время», а не просто его проводить. Гребер, Дэвид. Бредовая работа. Трактат о распространении бессмысленного труда / Дэвид Гребер. — М. : Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2020. — 440 с. Цитата на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

38🔥147

1 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈5,210 views61 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Запасы прихотника! Прихотник, или Календарь объядения, указующий легчайшие способы иметь наилучший стол; с приложением Сытнаго дорожника и с полным описанием лакомых блюд каждаго месяца, также всех животных, птиц, рыб и растений, приготовляемых в последнем вкусе. — Санкт-Петербург : Иждивением Ивана Глазунова, 1809. — [2], XIX, [8], 376 с., [1] л. ил.; 14 см. Иллюстрация на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥35224

31 Jul 2026, 04:56 UTC≈6,960 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Если кто сможет запереть русское желание в крепости, крепость взорвется! Эткинд, Александр Маркович. Содом и Психея. Очерки интеллектуальной истории Серебряного века / Александр Эткинд. — М. : ИЦ-Гарант, 1996. — 413 с. Цитата на сайте ОРПК Подписаться | Поддержать

🔥37223

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @obrpk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 32,003 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Общество распространения полезных книг” (@obrpk), 26,303 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obrpk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.