2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 12:16
49
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:29
49
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
71.4%
avg views ÷ 49 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
14 (17 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
490
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈580
Videos
≈18
Links
≈1,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8
38.1%
🍓
3
14.3%
💅
2
9.52%
💯
2
9.52%
🔥
2
9.52%
🎉
1
4.76%
🐳
1
4.76%
👍
1
4.76%
😭
1
4.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот если поместить человека в дурдом, здорового в целом, без явных психических отклонений, но всерьез сомневающегося в собственных умственных способностях и вообще не особенно уверенного в себе из-за своего маленького роста, веснушек, или там неправильной формы ушей, за что его наиболее отмороженные сверстники дразнили когда-то в младших классах школы, допустим, то очутившись в одной палате с тихо и буйно помешанным…
Одно я знаю точно: видишь какого-нибудь эстетически малопривлекательного субъекта, значит лучше держаться от него подальше. И не потому что его вид тебя раздражает, и от его присутствия у тебя портится настроение, на эти субъективные ощущения, в конце концов, можно было бы и не обращать внимания ради какого-нибудь важного для тебя дела, например. Проблема в том, что никаких общих дел с ним как раз вести и не стоит, …
много лет назад делал заготовку (сегодня бы сказали "промпт") для ночной передачи у Гордона, как раз про "Одиссею", там была такая гипотеза, что события обеих поэм - галлюцинации человека, получившего тяжелую ч/м травму в бою у стен Трои: "Илиада" это воспоминания о том, как герой сюда попал, "Одиссея", наоборот - фантазии о том, как вернётся обратно, передача не состоялась, но промпт был опубликован в сети
герой, р…
Хех. Получается, Игнатьев буквально предвосхитил слоп Нолана, который, в свою очередь, был снят по мотивам фанфика про Одиссея, за авторством тётки из Оксфорда. Жаль, что выпуск не вышел - он был бы всяко интересней ноланского трэша.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM8Sm-_OAhs
Гимн Творения из Ригведы (фильм Открытие Индии)
Сабы на ютюбе присутствуют
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @boring_chanell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Boring channel” (@boring_chanell), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boring_chanell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
