Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AnthropoLOGS

Channel

AnthropoLOGS

@AnthropoLOGS

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,057subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001479873558
TypeChannel
Username@AnthropoLOGS
DescriptionВзгляд антропологов. Общество, культура, гуманитарные и социальные науки: антропология-этнология-этнография и вот это вот всё. Чат - https://t.me/AnthropoChats Обратная связь - @AnthropoQuestionBot С антропологическим приветом.
Created22 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AnthropoLOGS

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,9998,0578,0286 August 2026 — 8,013 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,013 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,003 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,999 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,002 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,005 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,006 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,005 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,004 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,011 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,014 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,030 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,020 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,027 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,034 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,040 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,042 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,045 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,054 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,049 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,056 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,057 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 92 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,990–8,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 21:598,057+1
2 Nov 2026, 16:098,056+7
30 Oct 2026, 18:008,049-5
27 Oct 2026, 08:558,054+9
24 Oct 2026, 04:488,045+3
21 Oct 2026, 11:318,042+2
18 Oct 2026, 10:068,040+6
15 Oct 2026, 16:008,034+7
12 Oct 2026, 15:168,027+7
5 Oct 2026, 12:598,020-10
27 Sept 2026, 21:158,030+16
18 Sept 2026, 11:378,014+3
14 Sept 2026, 06:148,011+7
11 Sept 2026, 00:388,004-1
5 Sept 2026, 17:428,005-1
2 Sept 2026, 02:348,006+1
29 Aug 2026, 23:168,005+3
26 Aug 2026, 13:448,002+3
17 Aug 2026, 11:297,999-4
10 Aug 2026, 05:408,003first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 8,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held92 (29 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total44,129
Reactions total912
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,370
Videos
≈29
Links
≈3,280

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,646 reactions across 89 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤75428.5%
👍50819.2%
😁50118.9%
🔥47618.0%
😢1214.57%
🤡692.61%
💯582.19%
🤔371.40%
😱311.17%
🎃301.13%
🎉190.718%
💩150.567%
🦄140.529%
👎130.491%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,744 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (37.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC461 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Плотность теннисных кортов в Европе, как ни странно, тоже вполне может быть диагностическим признаком. Если есть ядро теннисной цивилизации — Франция, Британия, западная Германия, Италия, Бенелюкс, Австрия, Швейцария; есть полупериферия в лице остального ЕС, а есть теннисная пустыня к Востоку от линии Керзона, турецких курортов, и к северу от скандинавских столиц. Крайнее неравенство РФ и здесь проявляется в лице дву…

👍5❤2🤡2

11 Nov 2026, 08:27 UTC469 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🎬 Этнографическое кино: что посмотреть? Этнография — не только полевые дневники, интервью и научные статьи. Ещё один способ исследовать жизнь — с помощью камеры. Мы собрали пять отечественных документальных фильмов последних лет, которые рассказывают о повседневности, традициях и социальных изменениях в разных регионах России. 1. «У ветра нет хвоста» (2024) Шестилетняя Ника живёт в семье ненецких оленеводов на Ямал…

🔥5❤4😱2👍1💯1

10 Nov 2026, 13:26 UTC859 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Новая книга Александра Нефёдкина Военное дело тунгусов (начало XVII — первая половина XX в.) появилась в Фаланстере. Про военное дело чукчей все уже наслышаны, а вот тунгусы оставались в их тени. Впервые в историографии в отдельную монографию сведены вместе письменные, фольклорные, этнографические и археологические данные о военном деле тунгусов (эвенков и эвенов) в Центральной и Восточной Сибири, а также Маньчжурии…

❤14👍7🔥2

9 Nov 2026, 18:58 UTC773 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @antropolePhoto

📹 Больше не деревня: новая сельскость Новый выпуск про деревню с Екатериной Мельниковой (ЕУ СПб)! Почему горожане переезжают в деревню? Как они меняют сельскую жизнь и экономику? Что сегодня значит быть местным? Где искать настоящую деревню? На эти и многие другие вопросы отвечает Екатерина Мельникова, антрополог из Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, редактор-составитель и одна из авторов новой книги «Де…

❤13🔥6🤡4🤔1

9 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC897 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @anthropoAIPhoto

Карта ареалов аборигенных групп Южной Америки (составлена Отто Церрисом - в книге Pre-Columbian American religions, 1968)

👍14🔥2

7 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Потрясающая история)

❤3👍1💯1

7 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,120 views84 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @anthropologhettoPhoto

"Милый кембриджский дедушка-дупло": как 84-летний британский профессор антропологии стал звездой китайских соцсетей Поразительная история про парадоксы глобализации разворачивается прямо на наших глазах - почетный профессор Кембриджского университета, 84-летний антрополог Алан Макфарлейн всего за год стал мегапопулярным блогером в китайских соцсетях с аудиторией в 2,6 млн. подписчиков. Когда несколько недель назад о…

❤59🔥16👍9

7 Nov 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,130 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ama_gi_4

Как Ленин стал оборотнем в эвенкийской мифологии. В 1931 году в Сибири записали эвенкийскую сказку «Владимир» («Теперь в тайге светло»). По сюжету купцы обещают 3 рубля за убийство Ленина, который призывает эвенков жить и охотиться справедливо. Жадный охотник Долбонэ решает убить Ленина. В тайге он целится в голову Ленина, но та исчезает. Целится в спину – пропадает туловище. Потом Ленин становится полностью невиди…

👍16🔥11😁8👎2

7 Nov 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,130 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Ко дню Октябрьской революции постят эвенкийские сказки о Ленине, но всё-таки надо указывать, что перед нами не фольклор, а фейклор, изучен этот жанр довольно-таки хорошо 😁👴👨‍🦳🛠

👍10😁9

5 Nov 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,450 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Предлагали ли сегодня в России что-нибудь запретить? Конечно! Наше "общество в гражданском" (как вам неологизм?) сегодня предлагало запретить пиццу в школьных столовых. Нет худа без добра, благодаря этому я узнал, что небольшие лепёшки, которые в нижнем общепите часто выдают за пиццы, на самом деле беларуские смаженки, и я их за это по-новому зауважал. Но так же эта мимикрия и глокальность (когда локальное и глобал…

❤38🔥10

5 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC≈1,300 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @zachemmt

🤩 Как государства меняют этнический состав населения — и зачем им это нужно? У политолога Джона Макгарри есть интересный термин «демографическая инженерия». В своей статье 1998 г. он разбирает исторические случаи, когда власти пытались менять этнический состав территорий, чтобы укрепить над ними контроль. Зачем это нужно? Представим приграничную область, где значительная часть жителей не доверяет центральной власти…

👍11😢8🔥4❤2🤔1

5 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,180 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @stasiscenterPhoto

⚡️Объявляем о начале приёма заявок на междисциплинарную конференцию «Чувства дают сдачи 4.0» ➡️ Может ли негативный аффект выступать в качестве производящей силы? Где негативность открывает новые возможности, а где оборачивается подавлением и разрушением? Как негативный аффект создаёт новые ценности и идеи? Эти и многие другие вопросы будут подняты в рамках конференции, посвящённой теоретическому содержанию и практи…

👍6🔥4😱2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @AnthropoLOGS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@AnthropoLOGS edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Общество распространения полезных книг
@obrpk · 26,837
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
Книжные Подборки
@knizhnye_podborki · 22,683
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 74,886
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Центральное Болото
@iraq_rusproj · 23,605
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
PhilosophyToday
@Philosophytoday · 19,760
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
Гуманитарные конференции
@confhum · 26,195
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
Пробковый шлем
@pithhelmet · 23,215
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Горький
@gorky_media · 19,027
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
VATNIKSTAN
@vatnikstan · 19,955
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
Ordo Nexus
@nexus_search · 66,822
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
Книжный импорт
@importknig · 35,476
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Новости истории и археологии
@arch_history_news · 25,036
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Arzamas
@ArzamasLive · 59,813
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AnthropoLOGS” (@AnthropoLOGS), 8,057 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnthropoLOGS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.