Channel
@kinodeu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
11,220subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001136605564 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kinodeu |
| Description | Проделки шуньяты. Эзотерика, которую невозможно погуглить. Важно: t.me/kinodeu/500 Указатель: t.me/kinodeu/777 Донат: t.me/kinodeu/666 |
| Created | 31 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kinodeu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 11,220 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 11,219 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 11,216 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 11,210 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 11,212 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 11,210 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 64,330 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2026й январь — июль (без репостов) [ ❗️— отмечены тексты, которые я посчитал важными. 🌀 — забавными. ] t.me/kinodeu/2076 Мой роман о Понтии Пилате t.me/kinodeu/2077 Про моих прекрасных ведьм t.me/kinodeu/2078 Почему хороший маг не боится порчи t.me/kinodeu/2079 Возделывайте свои изумрудные сады t.me/kinodeu/2081 Ебаться надо в дазайне t.me/kinodeu/2084 Реальность познаётся в переживании❗️ t.me/kinodeu/2085 Я знаю в…
t.me/kinodeu/2170 На 140-летие Николая Гумилёва t.me/kinodeu/2172 Дуэль литераторов t.me/kinodeu/2173 Про пальму Николая Гумилёва❗️ t.me/kinodeu/2175 И снова о конспирологии советских сказок t.me/kinodeu/2176 Орден королевского фонаря (видео) t.me/kinodeu/2177 Смерть — единственный мудрый советчик t.me/kinodeu/2178 Вначале было слово, и слово это — «урод» t.me/kinodeu/2188 Моему любимому коту rip t.me/kinodeu/2189 Гл…
t.me/kinodeu/2299 Ещё 21 теургический фильм (часть I)❗️ t.me/kinodeu/2300 Ещё 21 теургический фильм (часть II)❗️ t.me/kinodeu/2301 О мужской инициации через спуск t.me/kinodeu/2302 «Керель» (Querelle, 1982) t.me/kinodeu/2303 «Сало, или 120 дней Содома» (Salò, 1975) t.me/kinodeu/2304 «Необратимость» (Irréversible, 2002) t.me/kinodeu/2305 Не всякое нисхождение поднимает t.me/kinodeu/2307 Почему в жертву приносят девств…
Мы тоже скучаем
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сегодня будет традиционный указатель постов за последние полгода (за всё время здесь: t.me/kinodeu/777), и отпуск для 'Кино и немцы', возможно, до конца лета. Но может и раньше — я уже по вам скучаю.
Начинать надо с инвентаризации. Только не с той. Виш-лист не содержит ни бита информации. Составить список желаний значит переписать то, что и так пишешь каждый момент времени всем своим поведением. Бакет-лист тоже: список того, что надо успеть до смерти, и там ни одного пункта про смерть. Мачу-Пикчу, парашют, устрица. Написано, только чтобы не смотреть на ящик в названии. Всё, что нам не нравится — вот то, что де…
И снова про гуманизм. Теодицея — это фантастически нелепые и наивные умствования детей почему папа с мамой закрываются на ночь в спальне и не берут их с собой. Что они там делают? Едят наши конфеты, очевидно.
Photo, posted without a caption
Эстетика барокко — это сеттинг подводного мира, со всеми декорациями: рокайли, морские коньки, жемчуга, наутилусы. Барочная архитектура, любое здание — это коралловый риф. Главный барочный инструмент — клавесин — устроен под стать: звук в него вложен мастером заранее, при изготовлении; никакой фразировки, окраски, игры на полутонах, "творчества" исполнителю не оставлено. Нажимай правильные ноты в правильных местах. …
«И часто он [Прокл] говорил, что если бы имел власть, то из всех древних книг оставил бы в обращении только [Халдейские] “Оракулы” и “Тимея”». πολλάκις δὲ ἔλεγεν ὅτι εἰ ἐξουσίαν εἶχεν, μόνα ἂν τῶν ἀρχαίων βιβλίων εἴασεν ἐν μέσῳ τὰ Λόγια καὶ τὸν Τίμαιον. — Marinus, Vita Procli, §38 // The Life of Proclus, or Concerning Happiness. Trans. K. S. Guthrie. Alpine, NJ: Platonist Press, 1925. P. 15–55. #Платонизм
Вот почему их дюжина. Платон не описывал строение Космоса. Он видел себя как космос — и описывал это. В «Тимее» прямым текстом: боги слепили голову шаром, подражая шарообразности вселенной, и вложили в неё те же самые круговращения, что идут по небу. Только у нас они сбиты. Выправлять предлагается, глядя вне: там тот же механизм, но работающий исправно. Не метафора и не аллегория. Инструкция по сборке. И написано…
В мире никогда не бывает больше дюжины людей одновременно, которые читают и понимают Платона, — этого никогда не хватит, чтобы окупить издание его трудов; но для каждого поколения они исправно передаются, ради этих немногих, как если бы Бог принес их в своей руке. (с) Ральф Уолдо Эмерсон, Духовные законы, 1841 г.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kinodeu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мы тоже скучаем
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 15,542 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кино и немцы” (@kinodeu), 11,220 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinodeu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.