Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Smart Babylonia with Olga

@SmartBabylonia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,290subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001496646422
TypeChannel
Username@SmartBabylonia
Created6 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SmartBabylonia

Growth

11,26911,30111,2856 August 2026 — 11,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,277 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,271 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,285 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,293 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,297 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,300 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,301 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,290 subscribers11,2906 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,264–11,306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:2511,290-11
13 Aug 2026, 05:2411,301+1
12 Aug 2026, 05:3711,300+3
11 Aug 2026, 04:3211,297+4
10 Aug 2026, 05:1811,293+8
9 Aug 2026, 05:2111,285+14
8 Aug 2026, 05:4611,271+2
7 Aug 2026, 08:3211,269-8
6 Aug 2026, 11:0011,277-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:3611,279no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0711,279first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.0%
avg views ÷ 11,290 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,050
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (17 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total39,680
Reactions total1,592
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,443 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
60141.6%
🔥29420.4%
👍25417.6%
😁1037.14%
❤‍🔥876.03%
🥰513.53%
🌚322.22%
👀181.25%
🤓30.208%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,592reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈2,440 views142 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Несколько адорантов (статуэток, изображающих молящихся) из храма богини Иштар в городе Мари третьего раннединастического периода (26-24 вв. до н.э.). Такие статуэтки изготавливались по заказу знатных горожан и устанавливались в храмах, чтобы постоянно молиться богу вместо самого человека. Статуэтки одеты в шерстяные одежды с бахромой – каунакесы, изначально у них у всех были инкрустированы глаза, а также добавлены у

78👍34🥰15🔥11❤‍🔥3🌚1

Signed Olga

6 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈2,220 views130 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Глиняные модели печени с предсказаниями, найденные во дворце Зимри-Лима, царя Мари (1775-1761 гг. до н.э.). Гадание по печени животных, гепатоскопия, было одним из самых популярных способов заглянуть в будущее в Месопотамии 2 тыс. до н.э.

❤‍🔥54🔥24👍22👀1210🌚8

Signed Olga

5 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,320 views138 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Очень красивый амулет из бирюзы в виде головы теленка с клинописной надписью касситского царя Кадашмана-Тургу (1281-1264 гг. до н.э.). Надпись гласит, что "Кадашман-Тургу - царь всего мира". Бирюза, как и многие другие драгоценные камни, импортировалась в Междуречье из восточных стран. Размер амулета 3.2 х 2.9 см.

81🔥39❤‍🔥11👍6🌚1

Signed Olga

3 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈2,750 views72 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

На прошлой неделе в Центре восточной культуры РГБ с авторами исторического фентези поговорили о границах художественной свободы в использовании мифологических сюжетов. Для меня это жанр новый (спасибо издательству Полынь) и до сих пор необычный. Подходя к нему я всякий раз думала - почему не исторический роман в стиле любимого мной "Синухе, египтянина" Мика Валатри, а фентези? Сейчас замечательные Анна Сешт, Мария

42👍15🔥8🌚6🥰1

Signed @SmartBabyloniaBot

2 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈3,020 views158 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Популярный сюжет древнеегипетского народного творчества - кошка прислуживает мышке (на папирусах или остраконах). Предполагается, что это сюжеты не сохранившихся в письменном виде народных повествований - басен или сказок с элементом пародии на социальное устройство Египта.

79🥰32🔥23👍12😁7❤‍🔥4🌚1

Signed @SmartBabyloniaBot

30 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC≈3,140 views115 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Барельеф в недавнем моем посте на самом деле часть большего барельефа из дворца Тиглатпаласара III (745-727 до н.э.) в Нимруде. На нем изображены не только захваченные животные, но и уходящие из города люди (женщины и дети) и – одна из известных иллюстраций – писцы, которые либо проводят инвентаризацию добычи, либо записывают рассказ о триумфальной военной кампании. Писцов два – первый пишет на глине, второй на пер

👍5729🔥24🌚3❤‍🔥2

Signed @SmartBabyloniaBot

28 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC≈3,430 views98 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Я несколько раз за последнее время сталкивалась с вопросом, иногда утверждением, что буквой А мы (пользователи кириллицы, латиницы и греческого алфавита) обязаны клинописному письму. Это неверно. Из клинописного письма в нашей алфавитной письменности нет ничего. Но если вам интересна история буквы А, то приглашаю вас прочитать о ней интересную статью лингвиста Алексея Касьяна. В статье рассказывается о том, как А пр

56👍27🔥11🌚4

Signed @SmartBabyloniaBot

27 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,920 views130 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ассирийские цари в своих надписях часто хвастаются, что при захвате городов они вывозили в качестве добычи крупный и мелкий рогатый скот. На этом барельефе из дворца Тиглатпаласара III (745-727 до н.э.) в Нимруде сохранилась иллюстрация этого процесса. Барельеф показывает успешные военные кампании Тиглатпаласара в Вавилонии.

🔥63👍3816👀6❤‍🔥4😁3

Signed @SmartBabyloniaBot

25 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC≈3,560 views211 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Частная переписка всегда притягивает внимание, ведь она раскрывает нам повседневные переживания людей, живших тысячи лет назад. Древний ближний Восток не является исключением. Среди клинописных находок мы знаем немало занятных примеров эпистолярного жанра. Вы, возможно, уже встречали упоминание об этом курьезном письме (TCL 18 111) из древнего города Ларсы, написанном сыном своей матери. Оно показывает, что социум н

89😁75🔥28👍10❤‍🔥6🌚3

Signed Olga

25 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC≈2,350 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @polynpublishingPhoto

ПАБЛИК-ТОК, который вы заслужили! В прошлый раз по независящим от нас причинам не все смогли присоединиться к паблик-току на тему мифологии, поэтому мы решили повторить его! Паблик-ток «Миф как фундамент: границы художественной свободы в работе с культурным наследием» Центр восточной литературы РГБ и издательство «Полынь» приглашают на дискуссию о границах авторской интерпретации древних сюжетов в современном фэнт

18👍9🔥6🥰3🌚1

Signed Olga

25 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,940 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В следующий четверг 30 июля с авторами исторического фентези мы ещё раз поговорим об использовании мифов в литературе. В прошлый раз дискуссия получилась очень интересной, так что если вы любите фентези, то обратите внимание:

16👍9🌚1

Signed Olga

22 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC≈5,120 views186 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В продолжение темы почитания покровителя писцов бога Набу в Ассирии. Ассирийский царь Ашшурбанипал (668-630 до н.э.) известен своей любовью к письму. В своих надписях он регулярно хвастается широтой своих интересов и глубиной познаний, но главное – умением писать и читать: ... Я Ашшурбанипал, царь всего мира, царь Ассирии, которого бог Набу наделил острым умом и способностью понимать письмо, то, чего не умел ни один

87🔥57😁18👍15❤‍🔥3🌚3🤓3

Signed @SmartBabyloniaBot

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @SmartBabylonia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,926 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Smart Babylonia with Olga” (@SmartBabylonia), 11,290 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SmartBabylonia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.