Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Новое литературное обозрение

@nlobooks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

18,534subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001053782072
TypeChannel
Username@nlobooks
DescriptionНезависимое гуманитарное издательство, основанное в 1992 году. Интеллектуальный нон-фикшн, современная проза и поэзия. Главный редактор — Ирина Прохорова. Интернет-магазин: https://www.nlobooks.ru/
Created23 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nlobooks

Growth

18,50118,53418,517.55 August 2026 — 18,501 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,501 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,504 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,507 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,514 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,519 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,530 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,531 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,534 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,496–18,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:1218,534+3
12 Aug 2026, 01:2218,531+1
11 Aug 2026, 02:1118,530+11
9 Aug 2026, 02:3318,519+5
8 Aug 2026, 03:1618,514+7
7 Aug 2026, 05:1018,507+3
6 Aug 2026, 06:1518,504+3
6 Aug 2026, 02:1618,501no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:1418,501first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 18,534 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,870
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (28 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total71,873
Reactions total1,150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,580
Videos
165
Links
4,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

682 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42862.8%
🔥12918.9%
👍9213.5%
👏213.08%
🤔50.733%
👎30.44%
😱30.44%
🤬10.147%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC928 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

12

12 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC925 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Алексей Белоусов о новизне книги Николя Трана «Плебс. Народная история Рима».

7

12 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,460 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Уже сегодня ждём вас на презентации книги «Плебс. Народная история Рима» в магазине «Фаланстер» 12 августа в 20:00 в книжном магазине «Фаланстер» пройдет презентация книги Николя Трана «Плебс. Народная история Рима» — попытка увидеть историю Рима с точки зрения обычных жителей города. Каким был Древний Рим плебеев — простых граждан города, не принадлежавших к политической элите? Чем они питались, в каких домах сели

14🔥11👏6👍2

11 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,070 views44 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Начинаем подробно рассказывать про новое оформление книг Мишеля Пастуро по истории цвета Книгу «Желтый. История цвета» будет открывать клапан с разворотом картины Джованни Беллини и Тициана Вечеллио «Пир богов», а на закрывающий клапан мы поместили картину Клода Моне «Водяные лилии». Этот том посвящен желтому — цвету, который мало присутствует в повседневной жизни современной Европы и скудно представлен в официальн

28🔥12👍4

11 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC≈1,850 views42 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Секретные материалы НЛО Сегодня в нашей архивной рубрике делимся с вами обложкой книги Франсуа Лиссарага «Вино в потоке образов: эстетика древнегреческого пира», вышедшей в «НЛО» в 2008 году. Вино — душа древнегреческой культуры. Симпосий, дружеская попойка и, одновременно, один из самых значимых социальных институтов, — одно из главных мест, где зарождались и производились культурные смыслы и формы. Книга Франсуа

28🔥8👍6

10 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,210 views49 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

На «Горьком» вышло интервью с Еганой Джаббаровой. О книгах «Руки женщин моей семьи были не для письма», «Дуа за неверного» и «Terra Nullius» с писательницей поговорила Анастасия Рыбицкая: — Ваши романы задумывались как трилогия? — Когда я написала «Руки», я вдруг осознала, что, кажется, не все сказала и мне обязательно нужна книга о Сереге [о брате. — Прим. А. Р.]. Книга о Сереге была нужна около шести лет с момента

32👍10🔥7

10 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈4,600 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Презентация книги «Плебс. Народная история Рима» 12 августа в 20:00 в книжном магазине «Фаланстер» пройдет презентация книги Николя Трана «Плебс. Народная история Рима» — попытка увидеть историю Рима с точки зрения обычных жителей города. Каким был Древний Рим плебеев — простых граждан города, не принадлежавших к политической элите? Чем они питались, в каких домах селились, чем зарабатывали на жизнь, как строили се

30👍3

9 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC≈2,290 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Продолжается предзаказ на книгу Майка Дэвиса «Экология страха: Лос-Анджелес и воображение катастрофы» В литературе и кино Лос-Анджелес уничтожали чаще, чем любой другой мегаполис мира: начиная с 1909 года, по подсчетам Майка Дэвиса, он разрушался не менее 138 раз. Опираясь на геологию и климатологию, градостроительные отчеты и заявления городских служб, Дэвис в своей книге рассказывает, что стоит за этими воображаем

🔥283👍3

7 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈2,940 views110 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

57🔥28👏9🤔5👍4👎3😱3🤬1

6 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈2,540 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @urban_literaturePhoto

Программа гуманитарного фестиваля НЛО «Воображая Калининград» До скорой встречи!

👍22🔥98

6 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈3,310 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Главные художественные книги Гуманитарного фестиваля НЛО в Калининграде Уже завтра начинается фестиваль «Воображая Калининград». Помимо насыщенной публичной программы мы проведем большую книжную ярмарку, на которой будут продаваться самые свежие новинки серии «Художественная словесность»: — «35 июля. Но это не точно» Ани Фёдоровой; — «Не место» Наташи Гринь; — «Катакомбы, колокола, костры» Анатолия Рясова; — «Снежн

27👍8🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈2,420 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новый эпизод «Неизящной словесности» В новом выпуске Денис Ларионов и Денис Маслаков беседуют с Зиновием Зиником о романе «Руссофобка и фунгофил», впервые опубликованном 40 лет назад и переизданным «НЛО» в этом году. Как сегодня читается этот роман и сохранил ли он свою сатирическую оптику? Как проза Джозефа Конрада повлияла на устройство книги? Как увидеть абсурд сразу двух миров, не принимая ни один из них за око

15👍5🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @nlobooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nlobooks edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,175 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Разговор о деревьях
@urtikanivis · 618
2 posts
Факультет антропологии ЕУСПб
@anthropology_eu · 2,620
1 post
Бельман
@Belm_an · 718
1 post
Книжный озорной гуляка
@bookpartyhard · 274
1 post
В контексте текста
@contexttext · 201
1 post
Вакансии для копирайтеров
@copywriter_vacancies · 29,211
1 post
creative woman
@creative_sveta · 1,223
1 post
Делаем книги
@delaemknigi · 12,522
1 post
Книжный магазин «Фаланстер»
@falanster_books · 21,514
1 post
«авторицы» и «поэтки»
@fem_ru_lit · 442
1 post
Феномен русской медиевистики: люди, концепции, институты
@fenomen_russkoy_medievistiki · 388
1 post
Наукогрядка
@fruitsoftheacademia · 139
1 post
Homo innatus
@homo_innatus · 257
1 post
Культурная история
@kultstor · 510
1 post
Лавровый лист
@laurelleaf · 156
1 post
ЯЗЫК в ЯЗЫКЕ :: лингвистическая эстетика
@linguisticaesthetics · 201
1 post
Мәктүпләр / مكتوبلر
@mektupler · 1,273
1 post
НОРМАЛЬНЫЕ СТИХИ
@norm_stihi_hi_hi · 576
1 post
Read_teach_crossstitch
@read_teach_crossstitch · 1,797
1 post
Религиовед 😜
@religion_hr · 274
1 post
Кофебрейк на семиотику
@semiotic_coffebreak · 558
1 post
Сигнал
@signalkld · 3,965
1 post
Публичная библиотека в Сигнале
@signalopenlib · 174
1 post
Институт советской и постсоветской истории
@sovietstudies · 168
1 post
°å°°°tmospheres
@syncweather · 782
1 post
Татуировка в виде косули
@tatuirovka_v_vide_kosuli · 885
1 post
[Транслит]
@translit_mag · 321
1 post
Городские историки
@urbanhistorians · 3,858
1 post
утешение философией
@uteshaet · 1,353
1 post
Вилладж пипл (Деревенские люди🫠)
@villagenn · 9,770
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Вишневецкий, Игорь Георгиевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…№ 3 (41). * ''[[Давыдов, Данила Михайлович|Данила Давыдов]]''. [https://t.me/nlobooks/6568 Микрорецензия на: Игорь Вишневецкий. Пробуждение: поэма. —…”
read 9 August 2026
Горнон, Александр Георгиевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…Умер 4 декабря 2024 года в возрасте 78 лет{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/nlobooks/4510|title=Новое литературное обозрение|website=Telegram|access…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Новое литературное обозрение” (@nlobooks), 18,534 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nlobooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.