Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сдали и приняли

Channel

Сдали и приняли

@gdetxt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,037subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001945606597
TypeChannel
Username@gdetxt
DescriptionБлог Вадима Ветеркова. Проблемы, беды и прочая жизнь, полная счастья. По вопросам сотрудничества @Gdtxt_bot https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67addce1962afd032d99494f
Created23 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gdetxt

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,95515,03814,996.56 August 2026 — 14,960 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,960 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,969 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,007 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,006 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,005 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,992 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,978 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,984 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,988 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,974 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,958 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,980 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,961 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,015 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,008 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,981 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,961 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,957 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,955 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,988 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,986 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,018 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,020 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,025 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,022 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,024 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,022 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,018 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,012 subscribers25 September 2026 — 14,997 subscribers4 October 2026 — 15,026 subscribers8 October 2026 — 15,021 subscribers12 October 2026 — 15,019 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,028 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,032 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,030 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,031 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,027 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,026 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,027 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,031 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,029 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,025 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,026 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,025 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,021 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,037 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,033 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,038 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,037 subscribers7 November 2026 — 15,036 subscribers7 November 2026 — 15,034 subscribers9 November 2026 — 15,028 subscribers10 November 2026 — 15,037 subscribers15,0376 August 202610 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 97 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,943–15,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 18:2615,037+9
9 Nov 2026, 08:0915,028-6
7 Nov 2026, 22:4915,034-2
7 Nov 2026, 00:0715,036-1
6 Nov 2026, 00:4015,037-1
3 Nov 2026, 23:0715,038+5
2 Nov 2026, 02:2015,033-4
1 Nov 2026, 00:3815,037+16
30 Oct 2026, 23:5715,021-4
30 Oct 2026, 03:0515,025-1
29 Oct 2026, 00:4815,026+1
28 Oct 2026, 00:5115,025-4
26 Oct 2026, 04:5815,029-2
25 Oct 2026, 04:5915,031+4
23 Oct 2026, 06:3515,027+1
22 Oct 2026, 05:3115,026-1
20 Oct 2026, 21:3615,027-4
19 Oct 2026, 17:0515,031+1
18 Oct 2026, 15:0515,030-2
17 Oct 2026, 12:1415,032first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 15,037 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,810
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held51 (8 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total33,770
Reactions total354
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,640
Videos
≈138
Links
≈871

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,448 reactions across 45 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮94411.2%
🥱91010.8%
😢90510.7%
😈86310.2%
🍌86210.2%
🤬85810.2%
👎85310.1%
😡8359.88%
👍7989.45%
🔥3994.72%
❤670.793%
😁480.568%
❤‍🔥80.095%
👏80.095%
😎80.095%
😱80.095%
🤯80.095%
🙈70.083%
👻60.071%
🥰60.071%
20 further kinds470.556%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,639 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,200 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Коротко: «Диалог» (выставка) «Место быть» (массажный салон), BMS Development Group (богатый застройщик и спонсор проекта), ART&BRUT (галерея; хорошая), Дом-интернат для сопровождаемого проживания «Гурьевский» (для детей с ментальными особенностями). Совместное экспонирование работ жителей дома и современных российских художников. Стою перед работой Кирилла Доешвили. Подходит девушка, спрашивает: «А как думаете, скол…

👍18🔥4🤬1🤮1😁1

10 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,540 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Меня спрашивают по этому поводу, а что же это за Томас Икинс? Побуду пинтерестом, оно в этот раз того стоит. Американец ирландского происхождения, «позолоченный век», нравился Клементу Гринбергу, врагу станковой живописи и нарративного искусства. Потому, что своё хорошее национальное искусство нужно любить.

👍19🔥9❤‍🔥4

10 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC≈3,010 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Оказывается, уважаемые коллеги из V–A–C Foundation ещё аж весной прошлого года перевели и издали «Искусство и культуру. Критические очерки» Клемента Гринберга, который у нас упоминался в контексте его «К новейшему Лаокоону», где он воюет с нарративным искусством. Ну, ничего. Книги — они как Курский вокзал: не вышел вчера, так выйдешь сегодня, тем более что статьям там крепко за пятьдесят лет. С другой стороны, у нас…

👍15🔥12❤‍🔥3✍1🤓1

8 Nov 2026, 12:30 UTC≈2,820 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @toncentermoscowPhoto

«Сон Пантагрюэля»: музыкальный перформанс Île Thélème в ТОН-ЦЕНТРЕ Мрачный ренессансный карнавал, полифония эпохи Возрождения, ирония Франсуа Рабле и старофранцузская поэзия XVI века — 8 ноября приглашаем на музыкальный перформанс «Сон Пантагрюэля». Композитор и режиссер Александр Белоусов переосмысляет страницы «Гаргантюа и Пантагрюэля». Многослойный вокал и фортепиано сплетаются с драматическим чтением, а пролого…

👍20🔥5❤2🆒1

3 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC≈2,940 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Как будто бы средство связи, которое мы заслужили к концу 2026 года.

👍19🔥4💯2😁2

2 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,020 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В Европе интересная аукционная жизнь, конечно. Например, в Норвегии есть аукцион «Валькирия», он недавно попал в скандал: выставил на торги «очень старый фрагмент еврейского свитка Торы, разграбленный немецкими солдатами СС во время Холокоста и отправленный родственнику в качестве сувенира». Это очень расстроило правительство Израиля, которое попросило своё посольство вмешаться. В итоге если верить Еврейскому телегра…

👍15🔥11💯2❤1🤬1

1 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC≈3,000 views36 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Для тех, кто не знал, что Ленинка поехала на своих катушках — вот. И да, это пиздец. Нашли время и место, коллеги.

🔥14👍11🤮6🙈5

1 Nov 2026, 17:35 UTC≈2,980 views26 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @muzynemolchat

Даруй мне рейв твоих библиотек. Нет, нам категорически не нравятся эти кадры из Ленинки

👍23🔥2😁1

30 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,490 views28 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Напоминаю, что Полина — замечательный художник.

👍15🔥10❤2💯1

27 Oct 2026, 18:02 UTC≈3,110 views35 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Что мне нравится во французах: культурная нация, с разнообразными вкусами. Если жечь здание — то неоренессансную ратушу, а не сарай какой, а если грабить магазины, то не только с бытовой техникой или даже с люксовой косметикой, но и с товарами для гиков. К сожалению, не вижу ни одной новости об ограблении букиниста, но что ж, упадок чтения — он во всём мире. И тем не менее, гикам в Париже в ходе протестов наибольший…

👍21🔥9❤5

27 Oct 2026, 13:15 UTC≈3,300 views27 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @netmonet_coPhoto

Разыгрываем айфоны за... чаевые! ⚡️ Да-да! Мы подарим три iPhone 17 Pro гостям заведений, в которых запущен рейтинг Легенд. Что нужно сделать? Сходить в кафе, ресторан или бар и оставить чаевые: 1. Перейти по QR-коду в Нетмонет и нажать «Участвовать» в сообщении о розыгрыше; 2. Войти в профиль гостя и подтвердить почту – по ней свяжемся с победителем; 3. Отправить чаевые от 1 рубля до 30 октября включительно. Рез…

👍12🔥12🙏2😎1

27 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC≈3,360 views28 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Наш корреспондент в Лос-Анджелесе (а у нас есть корреспондент в ЛА, пусть и не на постоянной основе) Светлана сходила в музей Лукаса — Museum of Narrative Art, который открылся около месяца назад. Мы часто о нём говорили, а между тем, по сообщениям СМИ и инфлюенсеров, там совсем не то, о чём мы говорили. Светлана опровергает эти сообщения: говорит, всё так, как мы думали — много нарративного искусства. Особенно ей п…

👍21🔥4❤2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @gdetxt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gdetxt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Культурный дилер
@culturedeal · 31,338
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сдали и приняли” (@gdetxt), 15,037 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gdetxt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.