10 measurements spanning 7 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,829–26,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 08:24
26,852
+13
12 Aug 2026, 06:37
26,839
+5
11 Aug 2026, 05:43
26,834
-12
10 Aug 2026, 02:11
26,846
-1
9 Aug 2026, 02:32
26,847
-8
7 Aug 2026, 23:07
26,855
+11
7 Aug 2026, 00:34
26,844
+10
6 Aug 2026, 02:10
26,834
+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:01
26,832
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:21
26,832
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 26,852 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,150
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
21 (2 February 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
10,300
Reactions total
313
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,210
Videos
≈858
Links
≈2,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 58s
Average length
16m 58s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,581 reactions across 21 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,722
76.0%
👍
751
21.0%
🔥
68
1.90%
👎
40
1.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,581reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📺 پایان حرفۀ یک کشیش
مدت زیادی بود که ویدئوهایی از یک کشیش ایرانی در فضای مجازی دستبهدست میشد. در این فرصت به سطح علمی او میپردازیم و به چند شبهه که دربارۀ اسلام مطرح کرده است پاسخ میدهیم.
مقدمه 00:00
شاهکار کشیش در نقد ترجمۀ الهیقمشهای 02:06
آیا سیوطی قائل به تحریف قرآن است؟ 03:44
معنای ﴿الصمد﴾ چیست؟ 05:56
آیا قرآن دربارۀ شرک مسیحیان اشتباه کرده است؟! 12:44
در یوتوب، با کیفیت دلخواه تماشا کنید
#ویدئو
_____…
فمنیسم با الحاد تفاوتی ندارد!
اگر بخواهی مظلومیت زنان را در یک سرزمین به پایان برسانی زنان فمنیست را بر آن سرزمین مسلّط کن!
زنان فمنیست، یک مشت زن ملحد میباشند که خواستار فحشا و بدکارگی هستند؛ البته متاسفم بدکارگی نه بلکه "تجارت سکس"!
پافشاری و حرص عجیب و غریب زنان فمنیست بر عادیسازی روسپیگری در کشورهای ما به تو ثابت میکند که در برابر دینِ شخصِ "ابلیس" قرار داریم که زیر نام "فمنیسم" فعالیت میکند.
بیشتر زنان …
هوان کُل (Juan Cole) تاریخنگار و استاد تاریخ در دانشگاه میشیگان
"واقعا عجیب است که میبینیم اروپاییها و آمریکاییها، مسلمانان را شیفتهی خشونت و جنگ توصیف میکنند
در حالی که اگر به تعداد کشتههایی که دو تمدن اروپایی و آمریکایی در ۱۵۰ سال اخیر سبب آن شده است بنگریم تفاوت، کاملا روشن است".
🇵🇸 @no_atheism | رد شبهات ملحدین
📚عنوان کتاب: اسلام و مشکل جنسی
✍️نویسنده: محمد قطب
📝مترجم: خداداد مطاعیپور
📄تعداد صفحات: 103
#️⃣ناشر: رد شبهات ملحدین
#معرفی_کتاب
بهجرئت میتوان گفت که هیچ دورانی از تاریخِ دور و درازِ بشر، همچون دوران معاصر شاهدِ گسترش بیبندوباری و روابط نامشروع در میان انسانها نبوده است؛ چنانکه کار به جایی رسیده که حتی خودِ غربیها نیز از آن به ستوه آمدهاند.
باید خاطرنشان کرد که بیبندوباری جنسی را دانشمندانِ غربی، برای بش…
ممکن است اعتراض شود که در خودِ قرآن، غیرمسلمانان حرامزاده خواندهشدهاند: ﴿عُتُلٍّ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ زَنِيمٍ﴾ [القلم: ۱۳]، و این نشان میدهد که ازدواج غیرمسلمانان در اسلام بهرسمیت شناخته نمیشود! اما دو نکته در این اعتراض مشهور مورد غفلت قرار میگیرد:
نخست. مسلّم نیست که معنای «زنیم» همین باشد؛ ابن جوزی در تفسیر این واژه چهار دیدگاه آورده است [۷] و دربارۀ معنایش اتفاقنظری وجود ندارد.
دوم. سیاق این آیات دربارۀ هر غیرم…
بارها شنیدهام که پرسیدهاند: اگر دو جوان به یکدیگر دل ببندند، چه نیازی به عقد شرعی وجود دارد؟ آیا خواندن چند کلمۀ عربی آنقدر مؤثر است که رابطه بدون آن حرام و با آن حلال باشد؟
سوالات خوبی هستند، زیرا با پاسخدادنشان ابهامات و کجفهمیهایی که حتی بخشی از دینداران به آن مبتلا هستند برطرف میشود.
عشق، اعتماد، همراهی و همصحبتی واژگان زیبایی هستند، اما ازدواج تنها ماهعسل و جفتشدن با یار نیست. ازدواج یعنی سازمانده…
تلبیس شیطان؛ ترک نماز به بهانه مشکلات زندگی
برخی افراد به دلیل تجربه سختیها و مشکلات در زندگی، نماز را ترک میکنند. استدلال آنها این است که چون نماز نماد شکرگزاری است و زندگی دشواری دارند، پس خواندن آن بیفایده است. در پاسخ باید گفت:
اولاً: این نگرش، ریشه در تفکری مادیگرایانه و گاهی ناامیدانه دارد که معنای واقعی عبادت و نقش خداوند متعال را درک نمیکند. در چنین شرایطی، کلید حل این مسئله، بازاندیشی در فهم ما از عب…
عفت قرآنی
واژۀ «عفت» در ذهن همۀ ما به «حجاب» گره خورده است، اما قرآن در این باره چه به ما میآموزد؟
ابن فارِس، لغتشناس نامی قرن چهارم، عفت را «خودداری از ناشایست» میداند [۱] و راغب اصفهانی مینویسد که «عفت، حصول حالتی نفسانی است که با آن از غلبۀ شهوت امتناع میشود». [۲]
از عقل و شرع پیداست که محدودۀ شایست و نشایست وسیعتر از پوشش و امور جنسی است، لذا راغب اصفهانی در اثر دیگرش به بیان نمودهای مختلف عفت در انسان م…
مجموعۀ رد شبهات ملحدین، عید سعید قربان را به همۀ مسلمانان جهان، بهویژه شما مخاطبین گرامی و خانوادۀ محترمتان، صمیمانه تبریک و تهنیت عرض مینماید.
این روز فرخنده، یادآور ایثار و اطاعت بیچونوچرای ابراهیم (علیهالسلام) و اسماعیل (علیهالسلام) در راه پروردگار است؛ نماد بندگی خالصانه و پیروزی ایمان بر تمامی آزمونهای سخت الهی.
باشد که این عید بزرگ، مایۀ برکت، وحدت و سربلندی امت اسلام باشد، و دلهای ما را از نور تقوا و…
فضل الهی و ناتوانی اسباب
سِنَّم از پنجاه فراتر رفته است. هرچقدر بیشتر پا به سال میگذارم، این باور در من عمیقتر میشود که تنها با فضل الهی بوده که -باتوجه به لطفی که خداوند به من داشته- به این نقطه رسیدهام. در همین حین، شدت این پرسش انکاری در من شعلهورتر شده است: در تمامی این سالیان، من کیستم تا به وارسی دقیق مسیرهایی مشغول شوم که مرا به این نقطه رسانده است؟
هرچقدر سالیان واپسین جلو میرفت، این باور در درونم روش…
📚عنوان مقاله: اصلیترین مشکلات امت
✍️نویسنده: احمد سید
📝مترجم: خداداد مطاعیپور
📄تعداد صفحات: 9
🗂ناشر: رد شبهات ملحدین
bit.ly/4aUcmmO
#معرفی_مقاله
استاد احمد سید (حفظه الله) در این مقالهی کوتاه از بزرگترین مشکلات کنونی امت و عواملی که در پدید آمدن آنها نقش دارند سخن گفته است.
ایشان عصر کنونی را برههی مهمی در تاریخ امت میداند که کنش یا انفعال آن میتواند در رقم زدن قرنهای آیندهی مسلمانان نقش بسزایی ایفا کند.
از ه…
❤44👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @no_atheism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 13,364 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 58 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رد شبهات ملحدین” (@no_atheism), 26,852 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_atheism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.