Channel
@anti_fact
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,146subscribers
+32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001205121755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anti_fact |
| Description | + بررسی فکت های مطرح شده در فضای مجازی + اندراحوالات سواد رسانه و تفکر انتقادی 📕... و اما تاریخ تحریف نخواهد شد (دکتر محمد مصدق) ADMIN t.me/Antifact 🤖 ربات ارسال سوژه : t.me/Antifactbot آدرس سایت : https://anti-fact.com/ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anti_fact |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 10,146 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 10,144 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 10,147 | +15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 10,132 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 10,121 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 10,114 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (19 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 108,490 |
| Reactions total | 5,211 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
5,211 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,634 | 50.5% | |
| ❤ | 1,245 | 23.9% | |
| 🤣 | 603 | 11.6% | |
| 😢 | 344 | 6.60% | |
| 😁 | 223 | 4.28% | |
| 👎 | 69 | 1.32% | |
| 👏 | 37 | 0.71% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 0.345% | |
| 😎 | 15 | 0.288% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 0.115% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.096% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 0.077% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.038% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.038% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.038% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.038% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anti_fact. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
حتی اگر انسان درباره مزخرفات هم صحبت کند باید بیاموزد چگونه همان سخن که مزخرفی بیش نیست را درست بیان کند. چگونه صحبت کردن از درباره چه چیزی صحبت کردن مهمتر است. باور کنید که یک بیان نادرست میتواند ماهیت سخن حق و درست شمارا به چالهای از مهملات در ذهن مخاطب تبدیل کند.
👍182❤15👎2😁2😢2
Signed Amu🇮🇷
اگر آنتیفکت به شما آموخته که ساده و سریع باور نکنید؛ این درباره مطالب خودش هم هست و شما اتفاقا با دقت بیشتر به دنبال آن بروید چرا که بسیاری از دروغگویان لباس و چهرهای نگران برای حقیقت به تن دارند.
❤222👍40👏7🔥6👎1🤣1
Signed Amu🇮🇷
در زیرپوست شهرمان اتفاقات خطرناکی درحال رخ دادن است که هنوز مردم آن را به شکل ملموسی احساس نمیکنند. درباره رجبزاده شنیدهام او را ربودند، دیدم که در ویدیویی او را شکنجه داده و در ویدیویی دیگر به فجیع ترین شکل ممکن او را به قتل رساندند و در ویدیویی دیگر به جنازه وی رحم نشد! نیز گفتهاند سرکوبگر بوده و تکتیرانداز است؛ اما واقعا فکر میکنم او نه کارهای بوده، نه حتی بعید بدانم فرق مرمی و تفاوتش با کالیبر را دانسته با…
👍379❤33👏14🤣10👎4🔥1😢1
Signed Amu🇮🇷
اپیدمی جوگیری و سندرم اتصال! یک فاجعه حاد در میان سخنوران و سخنرانان وجود دارد و آن جوگیر شدن با دیدن ارادت مستمعان به خود است. کافیست عدهای دور تا دور ایشان را حلقه کرده که از خود بیخود گردد و همانجا خودمانی شود و سخنانی از عالم غیب به زبان آورد؛ گویی سیم اتصالش به حدی از بالا و به بچههای بالا وصل است که اگر اراده کند اسرار سری موجود در درگاه الهی را نیز در اختیار دارد. اگر سخنورید؛ مراقب این اپیدمی شایع باشید …
👍147🔥9❤7👎4
Signed Amu🇮🇷
عکسی از سواحل شوروی ۱۹۷۵ وقتی ۵۰ درصد از خزر مال ما بوده پ.ن: قبل اینکه علی کریمی و باقی اعضای خرد جمعی ایرانی، این عکسو با افتخار استوری کنن باید بگم هوش مصنوعیه میدونم تابلوعه، میدونم... ولی باید بگم
🤣265❤12👍6👎2🤔2
Signed a
عذر میخوام؛ اما نمودی از دویدن جلوتر از رهبری را میتوان در بیانیه اخیر ایشان مشاهده فرمایید: 📖 متن اطلاعیه روابط عمومی دفتر رهبر انقلاب اسلامی به این شرح است: ✏️ بسمالله الرحمن الرحیم ▪️ با گرامیداشت اربعین حسینی و ادای احترام به روح بلند رهبر شهید انقلاب به اطلاع مردم شریف و مبعوث شده ایران میرساند، در روزهای اخیر برخی نقل قولها از رهبری معظم انقلاب اسلامی در فضای مجازی منتشر شده است که متأسفانه زمینهساز تش…
👍115❤13👎6🤣3
Signed Amu🇮🇷
معضل پیشقراولها! در بحران اگر انرژی جامعه صرف متهم کردن افراد، شایعات و گمانهزنیها شود بعید است این رویکرد به افزایش توان ملی یا کاهش تهدیدهای خارجی کمک کند و بالعکس معتقدم منجر به وسیع شدن و عمیق شدن شکافها خواهد شد. درست است؛ نقد زمانی بیشترین ارزش را دارد که مبتنی بر شواهد باشد، راهحل ارائه کند و به اصلاح وضعیت بیانجامد؛ نه صرفا به تشدید اختلافها دامن بزند اما توجه بفرمایید که درستی یا نادرستی یک نقد در ن…
❤72👍24👎10🤣2
Signed Amu🇮🇷
دیروز خواستم یک خبر خوب بدم ولی دیدم مستنداتی براش موجود نیست؛ حداقل فعلا! و بعدش بین گفتن و نگفتن موندم که یاد رمالا و فالگیرا و آینده گوها و یسری کانال مثلا مثلا میلیتاریست افتادم و خلاصه کلا پشیمون شدم از گفتنش. حالا موندم بعضیا چطوری وجدانشون قبول میکنه بدون اینکه بتونن سر موضوعی چیزی رو اثبات کنن اون چیز رو نه فقط بیان کنن، بلکه روش مانورهم میدن و کلی اصرار هم دارن؟ خوبه که حرف بزنیم و از دیدهها و شنیدههای …
❤136👍60🤣4
Signed Amu🇮🇷
Fact check Vs صحت سنجی
🤣138😎15🥰2❤1
Signed Amu🇮🇷
همیشه برام سوال بود واقعا کی به این نوع اسناد فوقسری و خیلی محرمانهی ولو کف مجازی اعتماد میکنه؟ تا این که روزی روزگاری در صف نانوایی؛ در انتظار نوبتم بودم که دیدم یه یارویی، با یه بنده خدای دیگه بلند بلند بحث میکرد. هی یارو اصرار که چنین هست و هی بنده خدا انکار که اینطور نیست تا این که یارو ولوم صداش اومد پایین و گفت برادر من! سندش دست منه!! یه نامه اداری نشون داد که مشخصا اصول گردشکار اداری رو نداشت، گویا یک ک…
👍209🤣38❤10😢3❤🔥2
Signed Amu🇮🇷
باشه ولی خب اولا از، به، موضوع درسته نه به، از، موضوع! ثانیاً نقطه آخر نامه از نان شب واجبتره و البته برای دفعه بعدی پیوست صلوات یادتون نره... مابقیهم بماند برای اونایی که باید بدونن. مشخص نیست روزانه دقیقا چند سند با طبقهبندی خیلی محرمانه اینطوری به ذهن مخاطبان پمپاژ میشه و با استناد به اون چقدر لاطائلات نشر داده میشه.
😁221👍31👏7❤6🗿1
Signed Amu🇮🇷
اگر همچنان به توهمی به اسم «حافظه» باور دارید، این دو قسمت وویس در مورد سوگیری بازسازی حافظه را بشنوید، نه فقط در مورد مسائل سیاسی یا آنچه بعنوان حافظه تاریخی میگویند، بلکه مسائل شخصی ما هم بشدت تحت تاثیر این سوگیری است و در بسیاری از نزاع ها و اختلافات شخصیمان، متهم ردیف اول، این مکانیسم مغز ماست قسمت اول قسمت دوم
👍48❤10✍3❤🔥1🎉1
Signed a
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @anti_fact. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 282,161 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANTI FACT | آنتی فکت” (@anti_fact), 10,146 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anti_fact.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.