Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مرتقى صاعد

@mortaqsaed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,035subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768516740
TypeChannel
Username@mortaqsaed
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mortaqsaed

Growth

4,9825,0355,008.56 August 2026 — 4,982 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,982 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,985 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,021 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,035 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,974–5,043 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:165,035+14
9 Aug 2026, 23:465,021+36
6 Aug 2026, 19:214,985+3
6 Aug 2026, 03:484,982no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:194,982first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.7%
avg views ÷ 5,035 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held34 (3 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total49,115
Reactions total1,603
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 46s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,468 reactions across 32 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
54837.3%
👍40527.6%
😁28319.3%
👏17912.2%
❤‍🔥191.29%
🤔80.545%
😱70.477%
🤝60.409%
💔50.341%
😢30.204%
😍20.136%
🫡20.136%
🔥10.068%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,603reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC430 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

شیخ‌الاسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه‌الله تعالی: در قرآن آیه‌ای نیست که در آن کسی به خاطر نسبش مدح شود و یا کسی به خاطر نسبش سرزنش گردد بلکه انسان در قرآن به سبب ایمان و تقوا مدح می‌شود و به خاطر کفر و فسوق و عصیان سرزنش می‌گردد. #احفظها_جيدا

35

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

11 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC546 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

امامانی همچون ابن حجر عسقلانی، سیوطی، ذهبی و ابن دقیق العید(رحمت خدا بر آنان باد)درباره شیخ‌الاسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه‌الله تعالی چه می‌گویند؟ برای مشاهده نظراتشان لینک‌های آبی را لمس نمایید. نظر ابن حجر عسقلانی در مورد شیخ‌الاسلام ابن تیمیه نظر ذهبی در مورد شیخ‌الاسلام ابن تیمیه نظر سیوطی در مورد شیخ‌الاسلام ابن تیمیه نظر ابن دقیق العید در مورد شیخ‌الاسلام ابن تیمیه آن جمع از ملاهای متعصب منتسب به تصوف(والتصوف منهم

20👏6👍1

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

10 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC970 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

🔉 پێشەواکان بە تایبەت کەڵەپیاوەکانی شافیعی مەزهەب ئیبن تەیمیەیان چۆن پیاوێک ناسیوە و ڕایان لەسەری چی بووە؟ ⏺ موحەممەد قادری(سەلاح) 🚀 رسانه مرتقی صاعد

13👍3👏3❤‍🔥2😁1

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

10 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC990 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

دو کانال علمی و پژوهشی برای اهل علم و عموم جوانان که خیلی توصیه می‌کنم: کانال استاد و برادر گرامیمان ماموستا خالد عزیزی کانال برادر عزیزمان ماموستا شعیب صیادی

23😁11👏4👍2

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

9 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,620 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

موجوداتی را که در این تصاویر مشاهده می‌کنید عروس هلندی و طوطی ماکائوی بال‌سبز برزیلی نیستند بلکه شیادانی هستند که به نام دین و عرفان برای دارایی مردم کیسه دوخته‌اند و از این راه مال و منال چشمگیری را به فساد جمع کرده‌اند. اسلام اگر از مصادر اصلی نگرفته شود و چراغ نصوص قرآن و سنت همواره بر فراز راه بندگی پرتوافکنی نکند انسان در یک چشم به هم زدن راه را گم و به باتلاق جهل و تاریکی و گمراهی می‌افتد، آن گاه هر افسانه و ا

👍42😁1611👏5🔥1🤝1😢1

9 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,080 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

📝 اگر حق بیان نشود باطل جای آن را می‌گیرد و مردم به عنوان دین آن را خواهند شناخت، در این صورت مبارزه با آن سخت و طاقت فرسا می‌شود. از این رو بود که علمای سلف این امت می‌گفتند شیطان، بدعت را بیشتر از گناه دوست دارد چون انسان گناهکار می‌داند که کارش گناه است و امکان توبه از آن وجود دارد اما بدعت را تدین و تقرب به خداوند می‌پندارد از این رو هیچ که از آن دست نمی‌کشد بلکه سخت از آن دفاع می‌کند. © هر اندازه که یک بدعت در

👏308👍5😁4

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

8 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC≈1,390 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

فأكثر متصوفة هذه الأعصار لما خلت بواطنهم عن لطائف الأفكار ودقائق الأعمال، ولم يحصل لهم أنس بالله تعالى وبذكره في الخلوة، وكانوا بطالين غير محترفين ولا مشغولين، قد ألفوا البطالة واستثقلوا العمل، واستوعروا طريق الكسب، واستلانوا جانب السؤال والكدية، واستطابوا الرباطات المبنية لهم في البلاد، واستسخروا الخدم المنتصبين للقيام بخدمة القوم، واستخفوا عقولهم وأديانهم من حيث لم يكن قصدهم من الخدمة إلا الرياء والسمعة، وانتشار ال

👍2714💔5

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

8 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈1,050 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

مەلایەکی سوفی: هەتا مابم دوژمنی وەهابیم.. #بۆ_حەسانەوە

😁465👍1🤔1😱1

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

8 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,410 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لا إله إلا الله هم بگویی به تو باور نمی‌کنم! یکی از این ملاهای متعصب منتسب به تصوف با من حرف می‌زد. گفتم من را برادر خودت می‌دانی؟ گفت: نه! گفتم پس چکار کنم تا من را برادر خودت بدانی؟ گفت لا إله إلا الله هم بگویی به تو باور نمی‌کنم. گفتم: مگر غیر از این است که اگر یک کافر، شهادتین را بر زبان جاری کند مسلمان است همانگونه که پیامبر ﷺ فرمود؟ تو که باید ظاهراً اسلام را از من بپذیری و تمام. داعش که از تو بهتر بود اگر می‌

👍4021👏11😁4

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

8 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,390 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اخوان و سلفیت، حزب هستند ولی ما نه! یکی از افتخارات ملاهای متعصب منتسب به تصوف این است که می‌گویند اخوان و سلفیت، احزاب هستند ولی ما حزب نیستیم! راستش دوست داشتم اینطور باشد ولی نه! تصوف امروزی چنان لوث شده که تا از یک عده معرف و مدافع آن اجازه و تایید نگیری نمی‌توانی واردش شوی اگرچه مدعی آن باشی. برای مثال من می‌گویم به تصوف راستین و زهد و تزکیه باور دارم اما از من نمی‌پذیرند چرا؟ چون با آنان همراه نیستم. چون در پ

😁4211👍10👏3😱1

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

8 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,770 views112 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یک ملای صوفی گفته بود ابن تیمیه وهابی است! این در حالیست که ابن تیمیه در سال ۱۳۲۸ میلادی وفات یافته و محمد بن عبدالوهاب در سال ۱۷۰۳ میلادی به دنیا آمده است. یعنی ۳۷۷ سال اختلاف. البته یکی از کرامت‌های محمد بن عبدالوهاب این است که عکس‌هایی از او موجود است و دست به دست می‌شود حال آنکه وفات او سال ۱۷۹۲ بوده و سال رسمی اختراع و معرفی دوربین عکاسی توسط لوئی داگر فرانسوی سال ۱۸۳۹ میلادی بوده است. یعنی ۴۷ سال اختلاف. خیال

😁9116👍5

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

8 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,290 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

به عنوان مثال برای آنچه که گفتیم بعضی از ملاهایی که تنها خود را اهل سنت و جماعت و شافعی مذهب می‌دانند چند عالم و فقیه را به عنوان دین و معیار شناخت حق از باطل قرار داده‌اند و آنان را به مانعی بین خودشان و مردم و قرآن و سنت تبدیل کرده‌اند هنگامی که برای یک موضوع از آنان طلب دلیل می‌کنی و یا سوالی می‌پرسی و یا می‌گویی دلیل از قرآن و سنت بر خلاف این مذهب است نه موافق آن، بلافاصله می‌گویند یعنی فلان عالم و فقیه ندانست ول

22👏12🤔2😁2👍1🫡1

Signed محمد قادری ( صلاح )

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @mortaqsaed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 31,972 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرتقى صاعد” (@mortaqsaed), 5,035 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mortaqsaed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.