Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مرکز هدایت؛ رد اسلام‌ستیزان

Channel

مرکز هدایت؛ رد اسلام‌ستیزان

@Hedayat1442

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

19,740subscribers

+40 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001403826346
TypeChannel
Username@Hedayat1442
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hedayat1442

Growth

19,70019,74119,720.56 August 2026 — 19,700 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,713 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,720 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,736 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,738 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,741 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,718 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,713 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,717 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,740 subscribers19,7406 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,694–19,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:0919,740+23
14 Aug 2026, 12:4719,717+4
13 Aug 2026, 05:3419,713-5
12 Aug 2026, 03:0219,718-23
11 Aug 2026, 02:0119,741+3
10 Aug 2026, 03:1119,738+2
9 Aug 2026, 04:1119,736+16
8 Aug 2026, 01:0119,720+7
6 Aug 2026, 22:0719,713+13
6 Aug 2026, 03:0219,700first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.35%
avg views ÷ 19,740 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held35 (1 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total50,804
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 53m
Average length
24m 50s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC952 viewsread 15 August 2026
File

عیاض، پرفروش‌ترین کتاب در بازار امروزی افغانستان نوشته: دکتور احمد شهرام وفایی کتاب مسابقه‌ی بزرگ کتابخوانی

14 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC842 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

عیاض، پرفروش‌ترین کتاب در بازار امروزی افغانستان نوشته: دکتور احمد شهرام وفایی

13 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

دورهٔ درسی حدیث شریف از کتاب «سنن ابی‌داود» به تدریس: استاد عتیق‌الله افندی 📍 مکان برگزاری: تلگرام لینک دروس: 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 https://t.me/Hadissharif1444/500 https://t.me/Hadissharif1444/500 https://t.me/Hadissharif1444/500 📌 این پست را با دوستان و عزیزان‌تان شریک کنید و در ثواب آموختن دیگران سهیم شوید.

12 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

شبهه: آیا ازدواج با محارم جایز است؟! پاسخگو: عتیق الله افندی برای دیدن این ویدئو با کیفیت بالا به لینک زیر مراجعه فرمایید. https://youtu.be/1UMAf8pRj_Y?si=KemAWsvzqdHo1GM0

12 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 15 August 2026
File

شبهه: آیا ازدواج با محارم جایز است؟! پاسخگو: عتیق الله افندی 📌 لینک کانال‌های درسی ما: https://t.me/addlist/pJHefUllQYk3Y2M1

12 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 15 August 2026

چگونه قلب ما نرم می‌شود؟ استاد عتیق الله افندی https://www.instagram.com/reel/Db5koyLsOk6/?igsh=MWlyanV1aXIxcnc2bg==

12 Aug 2026, 02:43 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 15 August 2026

اگر می‌خواهید به بسیاری از پرسش‌ها و شبهات ذهنی‌تان پاسخ بیابید، ایمان‌تان را تقویت کنید و در برابر شبهات و اندیشه‌های الحادی، توانایی دفاع علمی از اسلام عزیز را داشته باشید، دوره‌های علمی و عقیدتی زیر را به شما پیشنهاد می‌کنم. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/Hedayat1442/14030 https://t.me/Hedayat1442/14030 این دوره‌ها طوری آماده شده‌اند که با گذاشتن وقت کم، مطالب بسیار پُرمحتوا و مفیدی را یاد بگیرید؛ مطالبی که برای نیازهای فک

11 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 15 August 2026

مژده... مژده... الحمدلله، به فضل و توفیق الله متعال، توانستیم درس‌های جناب استاد عتیق الله افندی را به اکثریت از ولایت‌های کشور ارسال کنیم. شما می‌توانید این درس‌ها را به‌طور رایگان از نمایندگان ما در ولایت‌های مربوطه دریافت نمایید. نمایندگان ولایات: - نماینده ولایت کابل (بخش ذکور): محمد داود خراسانی شماره ارتباط با نماینده کابل: https://wa.me/93781752921 - نماینده ولایت کابل (بخش اناث): محترمه سون‌ارا شماره ا

10 Aug 2026, 02:41 UTC≈1,590 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

آموزش در تمامی بخش‌ها کاملاً رایگان! - نظام آموزشی پنج‌سالهٔ علوم شرعی (از ابتدایی تا دورهٔ حدیث) - دورهٔ تخصصی ترجمه و تفسیر قرآن کریم -برگزاری دوره‌های علمی، تخصصی و عقیدتی -مضامین درسی مدارس دینی اکنون در سال ۱۴۰۵، بیش از هزار دانشجو به‌صورت رایگان در بخش ترجمه و تفسیر قرآن کریم مشغول آموزش هستند. تحت نظر: استاد عتیق‌الله افندی آکادمی هدایت با رویکردی نوین و تخصصی در آموزش علوم شرعی، در تلاش است تا برنامه‌های

9 Aug 2026, 02:54 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

🎈 عنوان: ملحد برای اثبات بهشت و جهنم جایزه گذاشته! 🔅 استاد محمد باقر سجودی

8 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 15 August 2026

چرا دورهٔ «نماز نبوی طبق مذهب حنفی»؟ یکی از مشکلاتی که امروزه در میان برخی جوانان دیده می‌شود، ناآگاهی از منابع و دلایل فقهی مذهب حنفی است. گاهی به دلیل کمبود مطالعه و دسترسی نداشتن به منابع معتبر، چنین تصور می‌شود که احناف برای شیوهٔ نماز خواندن خود دلایل قوی و مستندی از احادیث رسول‌الله ﷺ ندارند؛ در حالی‌که این تصور ناشی از ناآگاهی و آشنا نبودن با منابع حدیثی و فقهی است. بسیاری از جوانان به دلیل نداشتن مطالعهٔ کا

8 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 15 August 2026
File

رد شبهات ملحدین پیرامون معجزه‌ ی شق القمر محقق: وزیر احمد عظیمی تهیه و ترتیب: مرکز هدایت؛ رد اسلام ستیزان

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Hedayat1442. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Hedayat1442 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,011 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرکز هدایت؛ رد اسلام‌ستیزان” (@Hedayat1442), 19,740 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hedayat1442.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.