Photo, posted without a caption
❤155👌15👏8👎4🤬3

Channel
@shobahat99
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,515subscribers
+88 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001012373536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shobahat99 |
| Description | ارتباط با مدیر کانال جهت ارسال سوالات: https://t.me/sharayet_soal99 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shobahat99 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 20,515 | +62 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 20,453 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 20,458 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 20,454 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 20,453 | +13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 20,440 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 20,439 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 20,436 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 20,433 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:10 | 20,428 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 20,427 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 20,427 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (17 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 54,570 |
| Reactions total | 2,305 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,843 reactions across 23 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,658 | 69.2% | |
| 👍 | 592 | 15.4% | |
| 👏 | 347 | 9.03% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 1.74% | |
| 👎 | 49 | 1.28% | |
| 👌 | 48 | 1.25% | |
| 😭 | 39 | 1.01% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 0.234% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.234% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 0.208% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.156% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 0.13% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.078% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.052% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.026% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,843reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤155👌15👏8👎4🤬3
در جامعهی ما هستند کسانی که می گویند ما اسلام و خداپرستی را قبول نداریم ما هیچ دینی را قبول نداریم اما در همان حال از دین یهودیت دفاع میکنند و معلوم نیست ضدیت آنها با ادیان کجا میرود؟ و نکتهی مهم این است: آن کارشناس طفره رفت و جواب نداد ولی آیا دوستانی که در جامعهی ما هوادار آنها هستند، برای سوال مجری پاسخی دارند؟ یا آنها هم جواب نمیدهند؟
👍95❤47⚡3👌3👏2
خودتان نگاه کنید و قضاوت نمایید اعتراض مجری مسیحی به کارشناس یهودی و پاسخ های او...
🔥54👍15❤7⚡2👌2🤬2🤯2👀1
📝📝 شخص مرده چگونه میتواند به عصا تکیه دهد؟ (شبههای در مورد حضرت سلیمان(ع)) ⬅️سلام. یکی از اقوام ما شبههای مطرح کرده است که دوست دارم پاسخ شما را بشنوم. او میگوید: سلیمان(ع) وقتی فوت کرده بود، چطور بر عصا تکیه داده بود؟ مگر شخص مرده میتواند با تکیه دادن به عصا سرپا بایستد؟ پاسخ🌻: وعلیکم السلام و رحمة الله و برکاته 📘الف) شبهه ایشان در مورد آیه ۱۴ سوره مبارکه سبأ است. الله متعال میفرماید: 🌺فَلَمَّا قَضَيْنَا…
❤106👍24👌8👏2🤔2👎1
شبهه ای که در یادداشت بالا پاسخ دادم در یکی از پلتفرم ها یک میلیون و دویست هزار بازدید خورده است... (ان شاء الله بعدا کلیپ کوتاهی هم میسازم و آن کلیپ را با کلیپ هم پاسخ می دهم) لذا امروز برنامه های دیگر را تعطیل کردم و فقط مشغول مطالعه و تحقیق در مورد این موضوع بودم متن پیش رو خروجی مطالعات فوق است. عزیزانم... بخوانید و استدلال فوق را یاد بگیرید از کجا میدانید فردا یکی از دوستان تان همین سوال را از شما نمی پرسد؟ …
❤119👍18👎3👏3🔥3⚡1
📝📝📝قرآن الهی است یا از طرف موجودات دیگر فرستاده شده است؟ ➖قسمت سوم، قسمت پایانی➖ 🔹سوال: ممکن است شخصی بگوید، اگر آدم فضاییها هم غیب بدانند چطور؟ شاید آنها آنقدر پیشرفته کرده باشند که غیب بدانند و این موضوعات را در قرآن و در قالب وحی برای انسانها بیان کرده باشند. ⚜️در پاسخ می گوییم، «پیشرفت و تکنولوژی» یک بحث است و «احاطه بر زمان و آینده ی زندگی افراد» یک بحث دیگر. ▪️آنها هرچه قدر هم پیشرفت کرده باشند باز هم موج…
❤75👍11👏5👎1
📝📝📝قرآن الهی است یا از طرف موجودات دیگر فرستاده شده است؟ ➖قسمت دوم➖ 🔹-گزینهی دوم هم طبق دلایل زیر نمیتواند صحیح باشد: 🔸دلیل اول: چون در قرآن و سنت پیامبر بحث غیب و پیشگویی وجود دارد: 🔹موجودات فضایی و ناشناخته هرچقدر هم علم داشته باشند نمی توانند غیبگویی کنند، اما در قرآن و سنت رسول اکرم(صلی الله علیه و آله) پیش گویی هایی وجود دارد که دقیقا به تحقق پیوسته است. ▪️-مثلا بحث پیروزی رومیان، قرآن میفرماید رومیان ب…
❤66👍11👏5👎1
📝📝📝قرآن الهی است یا از طرف موجودات دیگر فرستاده شده است؟ ➖قسمت اول➖ ⬅️شبهه: فرض می کنیم خدا وجود دارد و قرآن ویژگیهایی دارد که فرا بشری است. حال از کجا معلوم که این کتاب از طرف خداوند آمده است؟ چه بسا موجودات فضایی یا موجودات ناشناختهی دیگری این کتاب را برای انسانها فرستاده باشند... بله شما میگویید قرآن فرا بشری است، اما بعدا بدون دلیل میگویید این کتاب از طرف خداست... در حالی که باید احتمالات دیگر را هم در نظر…
❤56👍10👏5👎1
➖تفاوت زن و مرد ➖طالب بودن مرد و مطلوب بودن زن ➖فلسفهی تفاوت احکام ➖تفاوت پوشش زن و مرد ➖و کلی نکات دیگر آن هم با استناد به مقالات علمی دقیق نه فقط ادعا... ان شاء الله، در کتاب "جامهای بر قامت دل" دعا کنید زودتر چاپ شود. من خودم خیلی پافشاری کرده ام اما اگر دسترسی دارید، شما هم به مسئولان نشر احسان بگویید، این کتاب را زودتر چاپ کنند، ان شاء الله
❤147👏25👍8👌6👎3🥰2🤔1
📝مردها هم حجاب... 📘الف) ▪️ زنی زرتشتی از کردستان عراق گفته است: «مردها هم حجاب بپوشند، ما زنها تحریک شویم.» حال یک خبرگزاری آمده این حرف را به همراه عکس این خانم منتشر کرده است.. من هم زیر پستی که منتشر کرده بودند، این کامنت را گذاشتم: «هر وقت به خواستگاری مردها رفتید، چشم.» 📕ب) این حرف بنده در ظاهر طنز است، ولی اشاره به یک نکتهی بسیار مهم دارد؛ نکتهای که میگوید مردها طالب هستند و زنها مطلوب. به بیانی دیگ…
❤82👏24👍11👎3🤩3👌1😭1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤170👍35👏11👌4👎2
خیلی از جوانها از مشکلات زندگی مینالند از مشکلات اقتصادی، مشکلاک خانوادگی و انواع ناراحتی هایی که دارند... خواستم بگویم، وجود سنگ بر سر راه آب و تلاشی که این آب برای عبور کردن دارد، باعث ایجاد این صدای زیبای میشود... وگرنه این همه زیبایی بوجود نمی آمد. پس اگر پستیها و بلندیها باعث می شود زندگی یکنواخت نباشد و معنای خود را حفظ نماید تلاش ما برای عبور از ناراحتی ها هم، زیباییهای زندگی را خلق می کند... ( توجه بفر…
❤123👍12👏8👎4🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @shobahat99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 94,439 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شبهه از شما، پاسخ از ما” (@shobahat99), 20,515 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shobahat99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.