Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شبهه از شما، پاسخ از ما

Channel

شبهه از شما، پاسخ از ما

@shobahat99

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,515subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001012373536
TypeChannel
Username@shobahat99
Descriptionارتباط با مدیر کانال جهت ارسال سوالات: https://t.me/sharayet_soal99
CreatedBetween 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shobahat99

Growth

20,42720,51520,4715 August 2026 — 20,427 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,427 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,428 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,433 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,436 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,439 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,440 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,453 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,454 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,458 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,453 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,515 subscribers5 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 12 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,414–20,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:1820,515+62
15 Aug 2026, 19:1220,453-5
14 Aug 2026, 08:0820,458+4
13 Aug 2026, 00:0720,454+1
12 Aug 2026, 01:3220,453+13
11 Aug 2026, 04:0120,440+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:4220,439+3
9 Aug 2026, 02:3220,436+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:3720,433+5
6 Aug 2026, 02:1020,428+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:0620,427no change
5 Aug 2026, 18:4720,427first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 20,515 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,900
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held23 (17 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total54,570
Reactions total2,305
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
520
Videos
230
Links
2,360

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 05s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,843 reactions across 23 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,65869.2%
👍59215.4%
👏3479.03%
🔥671.74%
👎491.28%
👌481.25%
😭391.01%
🤩90.234%
🥰90.234%
80.208%
🤔60.156%
🤬50.13%
👀30.078%
🤯20.052%
😱10.026%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,843reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈2,380 views185 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

155👌15👏8👎4🤬3

10 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈2,820 views150 reactionsread 17 August 2026

در جامعه‌ی ما هستند کسانی که می گویند ما اسلام و خداپرستی را قبول نداریم ما هیچ دینی را قبول نداریم اما در همان حال از دین یهودیت دفاع می‌کنند و معلوم نیست ضدیت آنها با ادیان کجا می‌رود؟ و نکته‌ی مهم این است: آن کارشناس طفره رفت و جواب نداد ولی آیا دوستانی که در جامعه‌ی ما هوادار آنها هستند، برای سوال مجری پاسخی دارند؟ یا آنها هم جواب نمی‌دهند؟

👍95473👌3👏2

10 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,840 views85 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

خودتان نگاه کنید و قضاوت نمایید اعتراض مجری مسیحی به کارشناس یهودی و پاسخ های او...

🔥54👍1572👌2🤬2🤯2👀1

4 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC≈4,650 views143 reactionsread 17 August 2026

📝📝 شخص مرده چگونه می‌تواند به عصا تکیه دهد؟ (شبهه‌ای در مورد حضرت سلیمان(ع)) ⬅️سلام. یکی از اقوام ما شبهه‌ای مطرح کرده است که دوست دارم پاسخ شما را بشنوم. او می‌گوید: سلیمان(ع) وقتی فوت کرده بود، چطور بر عصا تکیه داده بود؟ مگر شخص مرده می‌تواند با تکیه دادن به عصا سرپا بایستد؟ پاسخ🌻: وعلیکم السلام و رحمة الله و برکاته 📘الف) شبهه ایشان در مورد آیه ۱۴ سوره مبارکه سبأ است. الله متعال می‌فرماید: 🌺فَلَمَّا قَضَيْنَا

106👍24👌8👏2🤔2👎1

3 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC≈3,890 views147 reactionsread 17 August 2026

شبهه ای که در یادداشت بالا پاسخ دادم در یکی از پلتفرم ها یک میلیون و دویست هزار بازدید خورده است... (ان شاء الله بعدا کلیپ کوتاهی هم میسازم و آن کلیپ را با کلیپ هم پاسخ می دهم) لذا امروز برنامه های دیگر را تعطیل کردم و فقط مشغول مطالعه و تحقیق در مورد این موضوع بودم متن پیش رو خروجی مطالعات فوق است. عزیزانم... بخوانید و استدلال فوق را یاد بگیرید از کجا میدانید فردا یکی از دوستان تان همین سوال را از شما نمی پرسد؟

119👍18👎3👏3🔥31

3 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC≈3,490 views92 reactionsread 17 August 2026

📝📝📝قرآن الهی است یا از طرف موجودات دیگر فرستاده شده است؟ ➖قسمت سوم، قسمت پایانی➖ 🔹سوال: ممکن است شخصی بگوید، اگر آدم فضایی‌ها هم غیب بدانند چطور؟ شاید آنها آنقدر پیشرفته کرده باشند که غیب بدانند و این موضوعات را در قرآن و در قالب وحی برای انسانها بیان کرده باشند. ⚜️در پاسخ می گوییم، «پیشرفت و تکنولوژی» یک بحث است و «احاطه بر زمان و آینده ی زندگی افراد» یک بحث دیگر. ▪️آنها هرچه قدر هم پیشرفت کرده باشند باز هم موج

75👍11👏5👎1

3 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC≈2,640 views83 reactionsread 17 August 2026

📝📝📝قرآن الهی است یا از طرف موجودات دیگر فرستاده شده است؟ ➖قسمت دوم➖ 🔹-گزینه‌ی دوم هم طبق دلایل زیر نمی‌تواند صحیح باشد: 🔸دلیل اول: چون در قرآن و سنت پیامبر بحث غیب و پیشگویی وجود دارد: 🔹موجودات فضایی و ناشناخته هرچقدر هم علم داشته باشند نمی توانند غیبگویی کنند، اما در قرآن و سنت رسول اکرم(صلی الله علیه و آله) پیش گویی هایی وجود دارد که دقیقا به تحقق پیوسته است. ▪️-مثلا بحث پیروزی رومیان، قرآن می‌فرماید رومیان ب

66👍11👏5👎1

3 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC≈2,940 views72 reactionsread 17 August 2026

📝📝📝قرآن الهی است یا از طرف موجودات دیگر فرستاده شده است؟ ➖قسمت اول➖ ⬅️شبهه: فرض می کنیم خدا وجود دارد و قرآن ویژگی‌هایی دارد که فرا بشری است. حال از کجا معلوم که این کتاب از طرف خداوند آمده است؟ چه بسا موجودات فضایی یا موجودات ناشناخته‌ی دیگری این کتاب را برای انسانها فرستاده باشند... بله شما می‌گویید قرآن فرا بشری است، اما بعدا بدون دلیل می‌گویید این کتاب از طرف خداست... در حالی که باید احتمالات دیگر را هم در نظر

56👍10👏5👎1

1 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,470 views192 reactionsread 17 August 2026

➖تفاوت زن و مرد ➖طالب بودن مرد و مطلوب بودن زن ➖فلسفه‌ی تفاوت احکام ➖تفاوت پوشش زن و مرد ➖و کلی نکات دیگر آن هم با استناد به مقالات علمی دقیق نه فقط ادعا... ان شاء الله، در کتاب "جامه‌ای بر قامت دل" دعا کنید زودتر چاپ شود. من خودم خیلی پافشاری کرده ام اما اگر دسترسی دارید، شما هم به مسئولان نشر احسان بگویید، این کتاب را زودتر چاپ کنند، ان شاء الله

147👏25👍8👌6👎3🥰2🤔1

1 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈4,000 views125 reactionsread 17 August 2026

📝مردها هم حجاب... 📘الف) ▪️ زنی زرتشتی از کردستان عراق گفته است: «مردها هم حجاب بپوشند، ما زن‌ها تحریک شویم.» حال یک خبرگزاری آمده این حرف را به همراه عکس این خانم منتشر کرده است.. من هم زیر پستی که منتشر کرده بودند، این کامنت را گذاشتم: «هر وقت به خواستگاری مردها رفتید، چشم.» 📕ب) این حرف بنده در ظاهر طنز است، ولی اشاره به یک نکته‌ی بسیار مهم دارد؛ نکته‌ای که می‌گوید مردها طالب هستند و زن‌ها مطلوب. به بیانی دیگ

82👏24👍11👎3🤩3👌1😭1

30 Jul 2026, 22:57 UTC≈4,270 views222 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

170👍35👏11👌4👎2

30 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC≈4,860 views148 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

خیلی از جوانها از مشکلات زندگی می‌نالند از مشکلات اقتصادی، مشکلاک خانوادگی و انواع ناراحتی هایی که دارند... خواستم بگویم، وجود سنگ بر سر راه آب و تلاشی که این آب برای عبور کردن دارد، باعث ایجاد این صدای زیبای میشود... وگرنه این همه زیبایی بوجود نمی آمد. پس اگر پستیها و بلندیها باعث می شود زندگی یکنواخت نباشد و معنای خود را حفظ نماید تلاش ما برای عبور از ناراحتی ها هم، زیبایی‌های زندگی را خلق می کند... ( توجه بفر

123👍12👏8👎4🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @shobahat99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 94,439 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شبهه از شما، پاسخ از ما” (@shobahat99), 20,515 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shobahat99.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.