Channel
@ghalaam99
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,046subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001098918715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghalaam99 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 31 October 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghalaam99 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 7,046 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 7,039 | +17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 7,022 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 7,018 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 7,018 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (24 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 54,892 |
| Reactions total | 2,170 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,914 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,338 | 69.9% | |
| 👍 | 412 | 21.5% | |
| 👏 | 139 | 7.26% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 0.575% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 0.366% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.366% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖥 طنزی از نژاپرستان با قومیت های مختلف؛ هیچ ایرانی مسلمان نیست و هیچ مسلمانی ایرانی نیست و یا بعضا با شعار تو اول ایرانی هستی یا مسلمان؟! 📝 قومیت اجباری ولی باور اختیاری است، قومیت بر انسان جبر شده ولی در انتخاب عقیده مخیر شدیم ➖ هیچ گونه منطقی وجود ندارد که اولویت بندی را تعیین کند و ما ملزم به چنین چهارچوبی نیستیم چونکه اصولا هیچ ارتباطی در اولویت بندی این نگرش وجود نداره ✏️ یک ایرانی و اسپانیایی و امریکایی و …
❤54👍13👏1
به این حجم از پوچگرایی بیخدایان توجه کنید که انسان را از کرم توی اقیانوس هم پایین تر می آورد ➖➖➖➖➖ ➖ما نه اشرف هستیم و نه مخلوق؛ ما حاصل یک فرآیند آشوبناک و «بی هدف» هستیم؛ در کنار هزاران هزار محصول دیگر. ما فقط یک گونه ی زیستی هستیم در جایگاهی مشابه با ٫کرم پهن اقیانوس و یا دانه ی گندم٫. هر چند شاید آنها مفیدتر هم باشند 📝 مطالب بالا اخرین تحقیقات علمی طبیعت گریی خالی از رویکرد دینی است. شما هیچ نوع کرامت و ارزش …
❤31👍4
➖ برای هیچ کس جایز نیست از رحمت خداوند ناامید شود, هر چند گناهانش عظیم و بزرگ باشد 📝 از این خدای اسلام هیچ گاه؛ حتی یک سطر هم که شده ناباوران از آن سخن نمی گویند
❤85👍10👏4👎1
🎧 ۲- همخوانی مدارج السالکین: سورهٔ فاتحه خواستههای اصلی را در خود دارد 📋 مباحث مطرح شده: بیانات ابن قیم رحمه الله در ارتباط با «صراط» - علت احساس ناراحتی و دلتنگی کسی که در «صراط مستقیم» حرکت میکند و روش رفع آن - رابطهٔ اسم «الله» با دیگر نامها و صفات پروردگار - نحوهٔ ارتباط بین آفرینش و امر پروردگار با اسامی «الله، رب و رحمن» - مراتبِ هدایت خاص و عام استاد عبدالله
❤44
مسلمانان وحشی یا متمدن ؟! 🔎 پاسخی کوتاه به خانمی هتاک و فحاش پیشتر یک کتابچه نوشتمدر باب تمدن اسلامی مطالعه اش خالی از لطف نیست 🎙 دانش پشابادی
❤55👍12👏3👎1
شیخ الحاد درباره ی زنان اروپایی می گوید: «بانوان ایران بدانند زن در اروپا ارجمند نیست، زن گرامی نیست در اروپا میلیون ها زن بی شوهر میلیون ها دختر بی نگهبان ...» 📚خواهران و دختران ما، احمد کسروی ص15
👍71❤19👎2
🖥 جهل عمیق خبرنگار شبکه انتر آشغال؛ تمام دانش مسلمانان ایرانی بودند. هیچ عربی در میان انان نبوده و همه و همه فقط ایرانی بودند، ایرانی ها هم همگی بزور مسلمان بودند و شمشیر زیر گلویشان بود و... ✏️ گاهی اوقات در مغز افراد بیمار، فقط پهن جای نورون رو گرفته و برای توصیف جهالتشان هیچ نوع کلامی وصف کننده کافی نیست در این پست و در این پست اینجا و کتابچه بنده در این باره 🎙 دانش پشابادی
👍76❤29👏5
با دنیایی از جهل بجون منابع دینی افتاده و برداشت محدود و ناقص خود را نیز حق مطلق می داند ✏️ همچون کودکی که با دنیای اسباب بازی بجون «کروی بودن زمین» آنهم با عدم شواهد علمی بیفتد 🔎 وضعیت گفتمان بسیاری از محافل شبکه های اجتماعی شبیه به طنز هست چون غالبا متخصصی، محققی و یا پژوهشگر منصفی پشت این جبهه وجود ندارد.... از محفل ادمای بیکار بدور از دانش کافی، دوری کنید تا شماهم دچار بیماری آنها نشوید
👏38❤17👍7
شبانه روز صدها کامنت همچون ایشون میبینم؛ یکی از دلایل عمده عقب ماندگی کشورهای خاورمیانه ای، زنده کردن نژادپرستی و اختلاف بین قومیت ها و نزاع بین «ملی گرایی با امت گرایی» است ➖ میتونم ساعتها بشینم از ده ها وجهه ی مختلف حجم بیهوده بودن چنین شعاری رو بیان کنم، ولی گاهی سکوت شاید قطع امید از سطح شعور برخی آدماست
❤78👍27👏8
دانشمندان ساسانی؟! 🖥 نه تاریخ سازی به ما انسانها هویت و عزت می دهد و نه خودباختگی فرهنگی و اجتماعی و تاریخی موجب تفاخر هست 🔎 نبود تمدن و دانشمند آنچنانی در زمان ساسانیان یک واقعیت تاریخی است ... 🔎 تمدن به معنای داشتن طبیب و شاعر و مترجم و نواختن آهنگ نیست، یک تمدن یا حضاره با بخش بزرگی از رنسانس حوزه های مختلف صورت می پذیرد ... 🎙 دانش پشابادی ➖➖➖➖➖ 📚 ایران در عهد باستان، محمدجواد مشکور، صفحه 451 📚 تاریخ بیهقی، …
👍50❤22👏8👎1
سلام علیکم برادران و خواهران محترم ☺️🌹 🔎 یک فرد کاردان و فهیم کتابی غنی رو شرح میدن، انقدر زیبا هست کارشون که ان شاء الله تا اخرین جلسات شرح مدارج السالکین رو تو کانال قرار میدم از نظر من بسیار مفید و کاربردی و فوق العاده لذت بخش هست 📝 وجود برخی افراد در این عصر رو غنیمت بدانید، برای هر کتابی در طی تاریخ اسلام بی شمار زجر، تلاش، همت و صدها خون ریخته شده... و صدها عالم اسلامی زحمتکش و دلسوز کوشیدند تا امروز به آسا…
❤89👏11👍4
🎧 ۱- همخوانی مدارج السالکین - شمولیت و اهمیت سورهٔ فاتحه 🧭 مدت زمان: 20:42 📋 مباحث مطرح شده: شرح سوره فاتحه در کتاب تقریب مدارجالسالکین: تفاوت رب و اله - شرح اسم رحمان در سوره فاتحه - شرح یوم الدین - شرح ایاک نعبد - شرح اهدنا الصراط المستقیم - شناخت راه مستقیم استاد عبدالله
❤51🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ghalaam99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 144,467 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قلم های نافذ /در رد الحاد/” (@ghalaam99), 7,046 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghalaam99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.