Channel
@pezhvaak_ch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,875subscribers
+217 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001509915410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pezhvaak_ch |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pezhvaak_ch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 6,875 | +45 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 6,830 | +103 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 6,727 | +65 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 6,662 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 6,658 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 6,658 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 29 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (29 March 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,940 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📺 پایان حرفۀ یک کشیش مدت زیادی بود که ویدئوهایی از یک کشیش ایرانی در فضای مجازی دستبهدست میشد. در این فرصت به سطح علمی او میپردازیم و به چند شبهه که دربارۀ اسلام مطرح کرده است پاسخ میدهیم. مقدمه 00:00 شاهکار کشیش در نقد ترجمۀ الهیقمشهای 02:06 آیا سیوطی قائل به تحریف قرآن است؟ 03:44 معنای ﴿الصمد﴾ چیست؟ 05:56 آیا قرآن دربارۀ شرک مسیحیان اشتباه کرده است؟! 12:44 در یوتوب، با کیفیت دلخواه تماشا کنید #ویدئو _____…
🎙 گفتار نیک تقریباً همگان آموزۀ «گفتار نیک، پندار نیک و کردار نیک» را شنیدهاند و تقریباً هیچکس معنایش را نمیداند! در این عنوان، در کنار تأکید اسلامی بر «گفتار نیک»، به این پرسش میپردازیم که آیا میتوان برای ترویج آیین زرتشتی به ظاهر همین عبارت تکیه کرد؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
🎙 نفرین مغاک همۀ ما از دشمنان خود فاصله داریم، اما آیا همزاویه نیستیم؟ چرا گاهی بر دیگران ذرهبین میگذاریم و بر خود چشم میبندیم؟ این اپیزود دربارۀ پیشگیری از هیولاشدن است. __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
⁉️ ایرانیان چگونه مسلمان شدند؟! __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
⁉️ آیا مسلمانان خانۀ کعبه را میپرستند؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
🎙 معذرت میخوام! این اپیزود کوتاه دربارۀ معنا و چرایی عذرخواستن است؛ آیا میتوانید به آسانی عذرخواهی کنید؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
🎙 من مسلمان بودم اما... با وجود نوکیشانی که از ادیان دیگر به اسلام میگروند، کسانی هم هستند که جامۀ مسلمانی از تن بیرون آورند. میتوان چرخش اعتقادی افراد را از نگاه روانشناختی بررسی کرد، اما گاهی این موضوع جنبۀ خطابه به خود میگیرد. آیا در مباحثات علمی جایی برای این شعارها هست؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
📺 ابن سینا و دین آیا ابن سینا بیدینی و خردمندی را ملازم میداند و دینداران را بیخرد میپندارد؟ دینداران در پاسخ به این گزاره چه میگویند؟ در یوتوب، با کیفیت دلخواه تماشا کنید #ویدئو
⁉️ چرا ندیده شهادت میدهیم؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
🎙 الجواب الصحیح در این عنوان با کتاب «الجوابُ الصحیحُ لِمَنْ بدَّلَ دینَ المسیح» اثر ابوالعباس ابن تیمیّه (۷۲۸ هـ) که اثری جدلی در نقد مسیحیت است آشنا میشویم و برخی محورهای برجستۀ آن را میبینیم. __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
🎙 توهین به فردوسی چندی پیش فردوسی را به نام طنز دشنام دادند و فضای مجازی میدان اختلافنظر مردم دربارۀ حدود آزادی بیان و جایگاه فردوسی شد. این اتفاق چه نکاتی برای ما دارد؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch
🎙 تصحیح اشتباهات رایج در ایمان به قضا و قدر لازم دانستم که در ادامۀ مبحث «آیا گناه ما خواستۀ خداست؟» و «صفت قدرت الهی» به سخنان رایجی بپردازم که با ایمان به قضا و قدر تضاد دارند. در این فایل صوتی به پرسشهای زیر پاسخ داده میشود: • ریشههای اشتباه اعتقادی مربوط به تقدیر در حوزۀ رد شبهات چیست؟ • آیا تقدیر ما نوشته شده است؟ • آیا همهچیز تقدیر الهی است؟ • آیا تقدیر همان علم غیب است؟ • آیا خدا در دنیا عادل است؟ • آیا خ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @pezhvaak_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 2,117 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pezhvaak | پژواک” (@pezhvaak_ch), 6,875 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pezhvaak_ch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.