Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ні, не той самий Болгарін

@ExitedBulgarian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,196subscribers

+48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002122053031
TypeChannel
Username@ExitedBulgarian
Created25 January 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ExitedBulgarian

Growth

6,1486,1966,1726 August 2026 — 6,148 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,176 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,173 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,196 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,141–6,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:246,196+23
9 Aug 2026, 17:516,173-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:106,176+28
6 Aug 2026, 12:016,148first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
176.3%
avg views ÷ 6,196 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,900
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total218,460
Reactions total2,516
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,516 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁75730.1%
59223.5%
🔥35714.2%
👍34213.6%
😡1596.32%
1094.33%
😢903.58%
💯291.15%
🤔250.994%
🙏150.596%
🤩130.517%
💔60.238%
🥰60.238%
💋40.159%
🫡40.159%
❤‍🔥30.119%
👎30.119%
🌭10.04%
😇10.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,516reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,400 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dom_chukCorePhoto

Збір для 131 Окремого Розвідувального Батальйону. Хлопцям потрібні старлінки, спеціальні павер-банки для старлінків а також додатковий детектор дронів Чуйка 4.0 аби збільшити безпеку при транспортуванні бійців у зонах дії ворожих fpv дронів. Як завжди за донат кратний 200 грн. ви можете виграти наступні призи: 1. Артбук по всесвіту гри S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart Of Chornobyl 2. Поповнення балансу у Steam на 1000 грн. 3

18👍10🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC≈2,680 views162 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Деякі кадри знищення транспортної колони в 20 км від лінії фронту силами 12 бригади "Азов". А також наслідки цієї атаки з землі. Колона знаходилися на схід від Малинівки (48.32427, 37.46221). На другому відео всього можна помітити близько 62 од. знищеного транспорту. Скоріше за все частина техніки була втрачена під час інших подій.

🔥12721👍12🤩2

8 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC≈2,310 views118 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @btvt2019Photo

По поводу первого применения танков Т-72Б3А с КАЗ Арена Сообщение в сети Х прокомментировал эксперт по боевому применению дронов @kriegsforscherD Цитата: я беседовали с одним из подразделений, участвовавших в той операции, и выяснили, эффективно ли работает эта система или нет. И, к сожалению, она работает. На одном танке эта система уничтожила 7 FPV-дронов. В общем, для уничтожения танка требовалось от 15 до 20 FPV-

😡7623🤔12😢6🌭1

7 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈3,930 views126 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁115😢5👍3🥰2🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈49,900 views87 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Написали коротенький текст з Богданом про те, як взагалі формується ціна "мідлстрайків", що на неї впливає і які фактори треба враховувати для коректного порівняння різних моделей. Приємного читання

43👍37🔥4🤔3

5 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC≈3,450 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @litaki_schizopost

🤝 Радий представити ще один новий аналітичний матеріал для "Оборонки". Розповіли про застосування Росією зенітно-ракетних комплексів С-300/С-400 у якості "ерзац-баллістики" та про їхню проблематику. Приємного читання!

👍35🔥25😡86😢4

5 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈3,860 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁112💯12🔥2🤩2🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈4,110 views266 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Зеленський: "Блять, а чо ви всі угараєте? СЗР розшифровується як "Слуга Зеленського - Рустем". Кого мені ще було призначати?" Smak | Підписатись | Підтримати

😁208😢39💯17🔥1🤩1

2 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC≈3,430 views121 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kiber_boroshnoPhoto

⚠️ Активізація використання А-50У для боротьби з українськими крилатими ракетами Ми проаналізували понад 1600 повідомлень в період з 04.06 по 02.08 зі згадками А-50У та побачили чітку тенденцію в проміжку з 4 по 22 червня А-50У фактично не піднімали для чергування проти України. У цьому вікні згадки лише про введення в стрій відремонтованого борта "47 червоний", що теж показує важливість цих бортів для рф, а також п

86🙏13😢12🔥7👍3

1 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈4,500 views166 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новий мідлстрайк від SkyFall Назву дрона поки не розголошують, втім назвали характеристики: 🛑 Дальність польоту — до 600 км. 🛑 БЧ — 40–50 кг залежно від завдань. 🛑 Вартість — $25–30 тис. залежно від конфігурації. Дрон вже виготовляється серійно і має контракти з міжнародними партнерами на постачання для СОУ. До кінця року компанія планує вийти на виробництво 1000 дронів на місяць. SkyFall відома своїми дронами-

110🔥43👍9👎3🤩1

31 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC≈20,600 views161 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Дмитро Путята (kriegsforscherD) У липні 2026 року Збройні Сили України вперше в історії знищили російську систему С-300В за допомогою FPV-дрона. Окрім цієї унікальної операції, варто відзначити фактори, що до неї призвели. А саме — помилки російської армії. Росіяни будують цілу ешелоновану систему протидії БПЛА. Слід зазначити, що у багатьох випадках ця система є більш продуманою в контексті стратегічного бачення.

104👍51💋4🔥1🤩1

30 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC≈3,840 views147 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @DniproOfficialPhoto

Ця повноцінна 3D-модель нафтового терміналу було створено за допомогою нашого продукту — Areal Vision. Продукт наразі перебуває на етапі розробки. У майбутньому він має допомогти Силам оборони краще планувати та реалізовувати наземні й безпілотні операції. Можливо, мине ще рік — і планування безпілотних місій значною мірою перейде у віртуальний простір. Маючи цифрові моделі основних цілей, оператор зможе просто обр

117👍26🤩2🫡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ExitedBulgarian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,170 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ні, не той самий Болгарін” (@ExitedBulgarian), 6,196 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ExitedBulgarian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.