Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Шалений Кіт

@Shaleniy_Kit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,173subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001461467495
TypeChannel
Username@Shaleniy_Kit
Created24 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Shaleniy_Kit

Growth

23,17323,22223,197.56 August 2026 — 23,222 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,221 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,217 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,212 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,202 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,193 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,189 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,181 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,173 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,166–23,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:4623,173-8
12 Aug 2026, 17:2223,181-8
11 Aug 2026, 14:3723,189-4
10 Aug 2026, 12:5523,193-9
9 Aug 2026, 14:1523,202-10
8 Aug 2026, 14:2323,212-5
7 Aug 2026, 16:1223,217-4
6 Aug 2026, 13:3023,221-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:4723,222first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.1%
avg views ÷ 23,173 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,980
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total139,640
Reactions total16,005
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,005 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7,98649.9%
😢3,58322.4%
3,01418.8%
😁7934.95%
🔥4772.98%
👏1140.712%
👎380.237%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,005reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Shaleniy_Kit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC≈4,880 views913 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Зненацька в месенджер прилітає повідомлення від одного з моїх «кошенят». Спочатку смикаєшся. Дуже сильно. Власне кажучи, я боюсь повідомлень в «синій». Бо саме туди прилітають чорні новини! І тому відкриваєш повідомлення, наче до міни підходиш… А потім читаєш і… миттю перехоплює дихання! Такі повідомлення від моїх колишніх підлеглих, найвища нагорода мені, як їх колишньому командиру взводу, а потім і роти. До сльоз

706🔥119👍88

6 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC≈6,130 views942 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Пан Валерій Пекар, людина, яку я поважаю, задав мені питання… «А що б Ви зробили?», мається на увазі в даній ситуації, як Президент країни? В ситуації, коли раптом, (ну так неочікувано сталося), нам припинили давати ракети до «Петріотів», в тій кількості, скільки ми просимо… На слова пана Валерія, звісно ж можна згадати анекдот, - Яша, займи тисячу баксів! - Ізя, дякую за комплімент! Але тим не менш… Колись, напри

👍80267😢62👏11

6 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈5,750 views768 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Можливо мені здалося, але… Таке враження, що Банкова запустила інформаційну хвилю на тему, яка звучить приблизно так: «У ворога дуже багато балістики, протиракет нам всеодно не вистачить, їх дають все менше та менше, але… ми всеодно перемагаємо ворога». Звісно ж філософський трактат «Ми всеодно усі умрьом», народився не учора. Але на це, є наприклад слова Голди Меїр: «Якщо ми маємо вибір між тим, щоб загинути й викл

507👍239🔥22

5 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈14,900 views834 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Що, серйозно? Та припинить! А ми думали, що це все через те, що якійсь пад@р відправляв втихаря «двушечку на москву» та десь, під час війни будували палац для якогось Вови! Ох вже ці партнери!!! Дійсно, заїп@ли в качель! Але, що зробив ТИ? Міняєш Міністрів оборони як рукавички та наплодив навколо себе кодлу корупціонерів? Може варто не партнерам докоряти, а в дзеркало подивитися, потужний ти наш палкаводіц!

👍708😁54😢44👏137🔥7👎1

5 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈5,650 views716 reactionsread 13 August 2026

«… але якщо буде палати Україна, буде палати і ваша Москва…» (с) В чому справа?.. Україна ще недостатньо палає? Чи мова йшла не про країну, а про піаніно «Україна» або велосипед?… Чи, що спічратйери написали те і ляпнув?

👍639🔥48😢217😁1

5 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈9,700 views720 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Коли я починаю чути закиди про те, що мовляв «Пускова іскандеру дуже мобільна, її важко знищити і тому…», мені спочатку хочеться задати просте запитання. «Чим? Чим, блядь, ви її зібрались знищувати?… Відосиками чи порожніми обіцянками Вови? Рекламними роликами про запуск чогось там від фаірпоінт?… Ліцензією на щось потужне, яку нам колись дадуть?… Чим?». Пускова «іскандеру» з маршу розгорається приблизно за 15-20 хв

👍613🔥65😢2713👎2

5 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈5,380 views640 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Володимир Олександрович, а хто з вашої потужної команди ефективних… максимально ефективних менеджерів, ще не вляпалася в мега або гіга корупційний скандал? Ви хоч на секунду собі усвідомлюєте, як завдяки Вам та вашій команді, Україна виглядає в очах наших західних партнерів?

👍561👏38😢28😁85

5 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC≈7,240 views970 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Окупанти наростили свої спроможності в балістичних ракетах. Про це нам нещодавно потужно оголосив наш гарячо «любімий» Вова. Як це їм так вдалося, (ультиматум жиж), невідомо! В той же час, Україна вже декілька тижнів залишається без Міністра оборони, себто очільника оборонного відомства в обовʼязках якого, як раз і є вирішення питань нашого щита та спису. Себто того, що рятує життя українців. Попереднього міністра,

👍599😢34518🔥7👎1

5 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC≈5,650 views428 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Грьобані кацапські виблядки… 😡😡😡 https://t.me/Pravda_Gerashchenko/141990

😢409🔥14👍2👎21

5 Aug 2026, 04:06 UTC≈5,650 views518 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ранок. Після чергового обстрілу пішов сильний дощ, якого і близько не було в прогнозі. Дякую…

356😢95👍40🔥24👏3

4 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈6,360 views656 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Умєров провалив Міноборони — і отримав Службу зовнішнішньої розвідки? Це взагалі... ЯК? У новому відео говоримо про кадрове шоу Банкової: чому ключові посади знову отримують ті самі люди, де професійні кадри і хто відповідає за наслідки таких рішень. Також — про нові обіцянки завершити війну, підготовку до важкої зими та удари Сил оборони по російських НПЗ і військових об’єктах. Дивіться та пишіть у коментарях, що

👍515😢11517👎5🔥3😁1

4 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC≈4,680 views834 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @dmytro_chekalkynPhoto

Oleksandr Zholobetskyi (полковник розвідки ГУР у відставці, розробник і керівник проекту Авеню): Коли свого часу призначили Буданова, мені здавалося, що кадрове дно у системі розвідки та національної безпеки вже досягнуто. Сьогодні стало зрозуміло: це було не дно. Просто знизу ще постукали. Призначення Рустема Умєрова головою Служби зовнішньої розвідки важко назвати рішенням, яке базується на професійних критеріях.

👍562😢24120🔥6😁3👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Shaleniy_Kit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 574,820 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шалений Кіт” (@Shaleniy_Kit), 23,173 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shaleniy_Kit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.