Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Прайс Тайм

Channel

Прайс Тайм

@PriceTimeBest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,571subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001402981174
TypeChannel
Username@PriceTimeBest
DescriptionВсе цікаве, що потрапило мені на очі в інтернеті. Навколо України, про все на світі.
Created13 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PriceTimeBest

Growth

7,5367,5827,5596 August 2026 — 7,536 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,536 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,564 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,580 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,574 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,582 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,571 subscribers7,5716 August 202619 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 13 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,529–7,589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 20:237,571-11
16 Aug 2026, 18:237,582+8
12 Aug 2026, 18:567,574-6
9 Aug 2026, 15:127,580+16
6 Aug 2026, 23:137,564+28
6 Aug 2026, 10:197,536no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:487,536first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.1%
avg views ÷ 7,571 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,600
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held38 (19 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total230,920
Reactions total5,988
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,410
Videos
954
Links
691

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 34s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,984 reactions across 38 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,80425.8%
🔥1,69224.2%
🤬1,64723.6%
👍1,39620.0%
😢2423.47%
😱1412.02%
🥰340.487%
😁200.286%
👎60.086%
💩20.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,984reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 02:13 UTC≈3,260 views68 reactionsread 20 August 2026

В 5.03 нові групи крилатих ракет зайшли. Все по круглим годинам, тактика повторюється. І знову, економлячи балістику)

🤬56👍12

20 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC≈3,480 views51 reactionsread 20 August 2026

В 4.16 зайшли крилаті ракети на Дніпро та Кременчук. Одже, це перша хвиля. Значить, на 5.0+/-, наступна хвиля може піти в інший регіон.

🤬38😱7👍51

20 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC≈3,700 views72 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Цікаво, бо цього разу економлять ракети. Але знову притримуються знову "круглих" годин. В 2.02 пішло повідомлення про запуск крилатих ракет Х-101. І то, тільки з рубежів Каспію. В наш повітряний простір ракети не зайшли навіть до 3 годин. Проте: В 3.03 пішли повідомлення про нову хвилю запусків ракет Х-101. Замість "тримання в тонусі" кожної години - лише повідомлення про запуски ракет. Значить, буде дві хвилі з різн

😱34👍16🤬166

19 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC≈4,050 views152 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Цікаво. Вихід Калібрів із Новоросійська. Чітко видно постійний вихід з однаковим інтервалів ракет. Значить це один корабель, всього 8 ракет. Можливо, це показ, що обидва Адмірали - Ессен і Макаров не виведені із строю, після наших влучень в обидва кораблі. Один точно зробив залп, або хтось із проекту Буян-М зробив цю роботу замість них. Щоб точно для нас показати, що наші удари не критичні.

🤬122👍20😱73

19 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC≈4,160 views102 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Якщо вони логіки Великої Балістичної Атаки не змінять, як минулих два рази, значить вся ніч буде безсонною. Кожну годину буде зліт якихось ракет. Приблизно, по їхній логіці: В 1.0 - балістика. В 2.0 - Циркони. В 3.0 - балістика. В 4.0 - захід крилатих ракет. До 5 ранку із світанком - крилаті ракети прийдуть до Києва. Можливий запуск реактивних Шахедів всю дорогу, тобто ніч. ВБА так проходила вже двічі. Подивимось на

🤬77😱18👍52

19 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC≈4,060 views105 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Ну що, день народження закінчився, але півні встигли привітати. Тому вперше, ексклюзив. І здається мені - це були збиття)

82👍19👎2🤬2

19 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC≈3,890 views103 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Добрий вечір) Оце вітають з днем народження. Спеціально раніше почали атаку)) Чотири вибухи чув)

44🤬32👍15😱12

15 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈6,250 views97 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍55🔥346🤬1😱1

15 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈6,400 views275 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Нічний приліт крилатих ракет Фламінго по ракетно-космічному центру Прогрес у самарській Безимянці - це подія стратегічного масштабу. Мова йде не про звичайний завод чи ремонтну базу, а про серце всієї космічної та супутникової інфраструктури ворога. І не тільки Рассветом єдиним - обернеться така влучна операція. Самарський Прогрес - це абсолютний монополіст із виготовлення ракет-носіїв сімейства Союз-2, якими росія

167🔥85👍18😁2😱2🤬1

14 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈4,780 views241 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

На болотах вирішили креативно підійти до нашої вимоги зупинення бойових дій. Не брали якогось алкоголіка радбезу, а зробили картинку про сніг на голову в якості Шахедів від свіноборони. Наша відповідь не забарилась. Відповів Страктком ЗСУ, і далі пішли вже меми від різних структур та підприємств. І можливо раніше, це виглядало б як війна мемів (і ми точно сильніші в ній), але останнім часом ми бачимо, що ми не прост

145🔥72👍14😁10

13 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈4,610 views147 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥122👍18🥰7

13 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈5,490 views297 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Вчора був дуже насичений день, тому можливо ви не помітили важливих деталей вчорашньої атаки по Новоросійську. І я зобовязаний їх підсвітити. Це було не просто "огонь со всех стволов" по наших дронах, як на відео, враження порту і двох кораблів. А величезна, комбінована спецоперація наших Сил Оборони. Майже всіх служб і ключових підрозділів. Поки ДШВ та штурмові полки від початку року продовжують операцію по відновл

194👍70🔥31😁1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @PriceTimeBest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Прайс Тайм” (@PriceTimeBest), 7,571 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PriceTimeBest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.