На это можно смотреть вечно. Эх, хороша Усть-Луга из Эстонии! Корреспондент ERR Дмитрий Федоткин снял в Нарве кадры, на которых видно, как с территории Ида-Вирумаа наблюдали за атакой на российский порт.
🔥683❤73👍71🤮12🤣9

Channel
@babchenko77
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
80,685subscribers
+578 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001118976998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @babchenko77 |
| Description | Канал Аркадия Бабченко |
| Created | 21 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/babchenko77 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 12:45 | 80,685 | +23 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 04:08 | 80,662 | +7 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:19 | 80,655 | +48 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:59 | 80,607 | +43 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:51 | 80,564 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 80,569 | +11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:27 | 80,558 | +47 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:38 | 80,511 | -26 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:07 | 80,537 | +24 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 80,513 | +29 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:09 | 80,484 | -34 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:11 | 80,518 | -20 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 80,538 | -10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 80,548 | -27 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:54 | 80,575 | +7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 80,568 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 80,566 | -36 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 80,602 | -26 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:11 | 80,628 | +35 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:29 | 80,593 | first reading |
448 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 448 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,650,760 |
| Reactions total | 255,829 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 08:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 90 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
848,537 reactions across 446 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 278,352 | 32.8% | |
| 🤣 | 181,334 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 131,854 | 15.5% | |
| 😢 | 84,076 | 9.91% | |
| 🤬 | 65,787 | 7.75% | |
| 🔥 | 64,945 | 7.65% | |
| 🤮 | 38,784 | 4.57% | |
| 👎 | 3,405 | 0.401% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 448 of the 448 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 852,480 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 448 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 57 of 133 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
На это можно смотреть вечно. Эх, хороша Усть-Луга из Эстонии! Корреспондент ERR Дмитрий Федоткин снял в Нарве кадры, на которых видно, как с территории Ида-Вирумаа наблюдали за атакой на российский порт.
🔥683❤73👍71🤮12🤣9
Замість захисту обʼєктів енергетики Київської області бачимо хороми зі жлоб-ремонтом і домашнім крокодилом. Замість поліції, прокуратури і спецслужб - філію колцентрів і наркокартелю. Замість кращих miltech компаній - зухвалу клоунаду від наближених до першого тіла менеджерів за сотні мільярдів бюджетних гривень. Замість нормально організованої мобілізації - залякування, свавілля і приниження і все це вперемішку з ко…
🔥819👍554😢169🤣81❤78🤬39🤮25👎8
Да чего вы все так накинулись на человека-то. Він створив Космічни сили закреслено первым в стране создал МилфТех компанию по выращиванию крокодилов для рва. В бассейне присутствует розовый цвет. Крокодила зовут Фламинго. Дайте ему еще два миллиарда долларов государственных контрактов - вам бы только украинские высокотехнологичные стартапы клевать и зубоскалить. Доброе утро.
👍828🤬356😢226🤣203❤26🤮22🔥9
У лютому 2014-го українці після запаху пороху та крові на Майдані ходили та дивилися на страусів у будинку Хряка. На золотой батон. Та на його автопарк у гаражі. Я сам там був. Сам дивився. Ну, той хоча б був Президент. Минуло десять років. Зараз українці ходять і дивляться на басейн із крокодилом а-ля Пшонка-стайл у хуй вообще пойми кого, у какого-то, блядь, бодибилдера з Дніпра. І на його Роллс-Ройс у гаражі. Ну...…
😢1,400🤬636👍223🤣94❤59🤮34🔥29👎7
Извините. Не благодарите. Не надо. Спокойной ночи.
👍607❤231🔥74🤮51🤣28🤬6😢2
Ноябрь. Марс. Морько.
❤709👍383🤮46🔥15😢8🤣4
Давно такого сильного интервью, как для Svitlana Samarska у меня не было. И откровенного. В последнее время я что-то вообще перестал политкорректничать и называю вещи своими именами. Я больше не могу видеть, как большая часть страны живет в каком-то своем мире. Розовые очки бьются стеклами внутрь. Всегда. Я не политик, мне не нужны рейтинги, я могу позволить себе говорить откровенно. В этот раз вышло даже откровенне…
👍997❤259🤮67🔥17🤣17👎9😢5🤬1
Открываешь мессенджер: "Привет. У нас нихера нет. Все закончилось. Каждый день прилеты по жилым домам. Много раненых. Срочно нужны турникеты. Срочно нужны бандажи. Много. Много турникетов и много бандажей"... Открываешь ленту: Президент Украины Владимир Зеленский поручил премьер-министру Сергею Корецкому разработать программу бесплатного проезда в городском наземном транспорте Киева... Да етит вашу ж мать-то... Про…
👍687😢405❤143🤮64🤣45🤬28👎5🔥5
Давно такого сильного интервью, как для Svitlana Samarska у меня не было. И откровенного. В последнее время я что-то вообще перестал политкорректничать и называю вещи своими именами. Я больше не могу видеть, как большая часть страны живет в каком-то своем мире. Розовые очки бьются стеклами внутрь. Всегда. Я не политик, мне не нужны рейтинги, я могу позволить себе говорить откровенно. В этот раз вышло даже откровенне…
❤935👍606🤮67🔥24🤣20😢17👎6🤬4
Он мне напоминает меня лет пятнадцать назад. Когда я был помоложе, погорячее и верил в человеческий разум. Прям дословно мои мысли. Я тогда тоже это все чуть не матом орал - что вы нахрен делаете, какие, блядь, две стороны. Просрёте же всё. Ваша задача сейчас выводить людей на улицы, а не "сохранять объективность над схваткой". Не помню у кого прочитал тогда хорошую формулировку: "Задача журналиста не писать, что дум…
👍1,770❤398🔥100🤣50🤮49😢16👎4🤬2
С радостью сообщаю, что великому Дэйне Уайту — яростному бойцу и воину — было предложено занять пост пресс-секретаря Соединенных Штатов. Я попросил его привлечь себе в помощники — пусть даже некоторые из них не из нашей страны — таких людей, как Ислам Махачев, Хабиб Нурмагомедов, Джастин Гейджи, Дэниел Кормье, Аманда Нунис и Кайла Харрисон. Нам нужны эти люди, чтобы защитить нас от «безумных левых». Дэйна станет уник…
🤣1,740👍387😢198❤86🤮54🤬41🔥20👎8
У нас тут ежегодная всеэстонская ярмарка народных ремесел проходит. Хотел купить себе сапоги. Яловые! Но, блин, вот как так: в наличии есть все размеры от сорокового до сорок седьмого - кроме моего сорок пятого. Тогда купил дохлой коровы хвост. Ну, а как иначе. Что за жизнь без хвоста. Вообще, я слабо представляю, что в голове у людей, которые могут пройти мимо хвоста - и не купить его. Опасные люди, по-моему. Ненаде…
👍936❤363🤣218🤮49🔥17👎5😢3🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 448 posts we hold for @babchenko77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@babchenko77 edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @babchenko77 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 82 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Arkady Babchenko |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian journalist |
| X / Twitter | @StarshinaZapasa |
| YouTube | UC-_tNfeFV3bEG_7oGnWHA5w |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Babchenko” (@babchenko77), 80,685 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babchenko77.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.